Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #28665
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-21 10:39 -0800 |
| References | <194ebd0a-9808-4612-947c-d031ae0b64f7@googlegroups.com> <2014Feb19.163656@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <9965dd68-c2d2-46bd-980a-656d2f3a7c20@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <57e2d186-e95a-4000-925e-dfc9103a800b@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: +TO in GForth |
| From | Harold <hzrabbie@gmail.com> |
On Thursday, February 20, 2014 9:36:58 PM UTC-8, hughag...@yahoo.com wrote: > The ANS-Forth >BODY only works with words defined by CREATE. In 6.1.0550 it says: "An ambiguous condition exists if xt is not for a word defined via CREATE." Correct. > I would expect an optimizing compiler to define VALUE such that it generates a colon word. If the dictionary is writeable, I'd expect VALUE to compile the same as CONSTANT. The run-time semantics are the same.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
+TO in GForth Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-02-19 07:08 -0800
Re: +TO in GForth Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2014-02-19 07:31 -0800
Re: +TO in GForth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-02-19 15:36 +0000
Re: +TO in GForth hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-02-20 21:36 -0800
Re: +TO in GForth Harold <hzrabbie@gmail.com> - 2014-02-21 10:39 -0800
Re: +TO in GForth Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2014-02-23 04:31 -0800
Re: +TO in GForth Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-02-23 15:10 -0800
Re: +TO in GForth hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-02-19 22:44 -0800
csiph-web