Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #38582
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-24 13:21 -0700 |
| References | <mepsj9$ufr$1@dont-email.me> <081e1516-1c08-4282-bdc6-141adc6ee080@googlegroups.com> <50eb8b05-d7e1-4818-b2f2-84ec674079fb@googlegroups.com> <5530b939$0$2856$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <mh6p18$gpv$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <482fd39f-e9e6-49dc-95d5-5e88639a02e9@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Decoding Roman numerals |
| From | hughaguilar96@gmail.com |
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 5:13:25 PM UTC-7, Bernd Paysan wrote: > Hans Bezemer wrote: > > > hughaguilar96@gmail.com wrote: > >> The other Forth example used DOES> in interpretive mode, which is not > >> ANS-Forth. I don't know of any Forth that does allow this. > > Like gForth? > > Well, you know a Forth that does this. Hugh is entitled to be an idiot, and > he always brags about his lack of knowledge, as if not knowing something was > an achievement ;-). Something like the Alzheimer way to enlightenment or > so. Why am I an idiot because I don't know about the non-standard quirks of gForth? Why are the readers of RosettaCode expected to know about the non-standard quirks of gForth? Why are they expected to know that the Forth code shown is gForth rather than ANS-Forth, when there is no comment indicating which Forth it was written in? I think that you are over-stating the importance of gForth --- gForth is useless because it is written in C and hence is abysmally slow --- gForth is not important; it has never been used for writing commercial software and it never will be.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Decoding Roman numerals "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-23 20:20 +0000
Re: Decoding Roman numerals foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2015-03-25 20:01 -0700
Re: Decoding Roman numerals hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-03-29 14:21 -0700
Re: Decoding Roman numerals foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2015-03-30 21:20 -0700
Re: Decoding Roman numerals hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-03-30 22:00 -0700
Re: Decoding Roman numerals anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-03-31 07:05 +0000
Re: Decoding Roman numerals hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-03-31 16:29 -0700
Re: Decoding Roman numerals Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2015-04-01 11:43 +0200
Re: Decoding Roman numerals anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-04-01 10:04 +0000
Re: Decoding Roman numerals hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-04-01 19:27 -0700
Re: Decoding Roman numerals "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2015-04-02 11:39 +0100
Re: Decoding Roman numerals foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2015-03-31 06:43 -0700
Re: Decoding Roman numerals Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2015-04-02 12:56 +0200
Re: Decoding Roman numerals Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2015-04-17 09:41 +0200
Re: Decoding Roman numerals "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2015-04-17 11:05 +0100
Re: Decoding Roman numerals hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-04-17 09:53 -0700
Re: Decoding Roman numerals Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2015-04-18 12:48 +0200
Re: Decoding Roman numerals Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-04-22 02:13 +0200
Re: Decoding Roman numerals hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-04-24 13:21 -0700
csiph-web