Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #58085
| From | anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: mixed double and single signed division |
| Date | 2017-04-25 11:30 +0000 |
| Organization | Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien |
| Message-ID | <2017Apr25.133017@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <f8a33236-78f6-462e-9bc1-67e2ca5c92b7@googlegroups.com> <2017Apr24.151206@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <57830405-b5fe-4bf5-88dd-88a3838f1341@googlegroups.com> <1vGdnY977oFcNmPFnZ2dnUU7-QnNnZ2d@supernews.com> <877f28g7pt.fsf@nightsong.com> |
Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes:
>I don't understand the difference. Can the target system document its
>response to implementation-defined item X as "doing X makes demons fly
>out of your nose"?
That would define the behaviour, too. But yes, I have come across a
posting that said that the implementation can define a particular
implementation-defined behaviour to be undefined.
And my guess is that, at one point, the gcc and clang maintainers will
no longer be content with "optimizing" based on the assumption that
the program undefined does not contain undefined behaviour, and then
they will also "optimize" based on the assumption that
implementation-defined behaviour does not happen. And they will have
language lawyers and fanboys who will support them in that position.
- anton
--
M. Anton Ertl http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
EuroForth 2017: http://www.euroforth.org/ef17/
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
mixed double and single signed division krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2017-04-22 08:21 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division NN <november.nihal@gmail.com> - 2017-04-22 09:14 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division NN <november.nihal@gmail.com> - 2017-04-22 09:22 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division Coos Haak <htrofhc@gmail.com> - 2017-04-22 23:31 +0200
Re: mixed double and single signed division krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2017-04-23 06:44 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-23 13:24 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2017-04-23 06:41 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2017-04-23 13:29 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-22 11:40 -0500
Re: mixed double and single signed division krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2017-04-23 06:52 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-23 13:02 +1000
Re: mixed double and single signed division "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-22 17:58 -1000
Re: mixed double and single signed division krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2017-04-23 13:36 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2017-04-23 16:33 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-24 13:23 +0000
Re: mixed double and single signed division krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2017-04-24 18:49 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-24 13:12 +0000
Re: mixed double and single signed division krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2017-04-24 18:35 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-24 15:52 -1000
Re: mixed double and single signed division krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2017-04-25 02:18 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-25 02:25 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-25 11:30 +0000
Re: mixed double and single signed division "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-25 08:08 -1000
Re: mixed double and single signed division anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-26 14:48 +0000
Re: mixed double and single signed division anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-25 08:40 +0000
Re: mixed double and single signed division krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2017-04-25 02:25 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2017-04-25 03:00 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-25 11:37 +0000
Re: mixed double and single signed division krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2017-04-25 05:27 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-25 13:34 +0000
Re: mixed double and single signed division krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2017-04-25 15:29 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-27 14:02 +1000
Re: mixed double and single signed division krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2017-04-27 16:00 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-27 19:20 -1000
Re: mixed double and single signed division "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-28 22:41 +1000
Re: mixed double and single signed division Coos Haak <htrofhc@gmail.com> - 2017-04-25 15:32 +0200
Re: mixed double and single signed division krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2017-04-25 15:22 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2017-04-23 06:55 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-23 13:30 -1000
Re: mixed double and single signed division krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2017-04-23 16:45 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-24 10:56 +1000
Re: mixed double and single signed division "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-23 15:06 -1000
Re: mixed double and single signed division hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-23 19:10 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-23 19:12 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-23 16:31 -1000
Re: mixed double and single signed division hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-23 21:17 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-23 21:47 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-23 22:58 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-23 23:22 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-24 04:46 -0500
Re: mixed double and single signed division "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-24 12:59 +1000
Re: mixed double and single signed division "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-23 18:03 -1000
Re: mixed double and single signed division hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-23 21:22 -0700
Re: mixed double and single signed division "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-25 12:53 +1000
Re: mixed double and single signed division "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-24 21:55 -1000
Re: mixed double and single signed division "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-25 20:00 +1000
csiph-web