Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #48569
| From | anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Implementation of LEAVE? |
| Date | 2016-06-27 14:21 +0000 |
| Organization | Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien |
| Message-ID | <2016Jun27.162159@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <VrydnXcnK-4_0fPKnZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@supernews.com> <83bac854-6e02-426e-8de1-6705f8192d29@googlegroups.com> <-YednSXg24UKN_PKnZ2dnUU7-IvNnZ2d@supernews.com> <2016Jun25.193447@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <X6udnaRl8rsZkO3KnZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@supernews.com> |
Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> writes:
>Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
>> Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> writes:
>>
>>>Quotations for the win! :-)
>>
>> If we can manage to convince you, there is still hope for humanity:-)
>
>OK, I guess that was a joke, but if so I don't get it. I
>always argued for quatations.
Maybe I just confused you with someone who had argued against. Too
bad: No convincing, no hope for humanity:-).
>> Anyway, maybe time for Alex McDonald (is he still active?) to update
>> the RfD (if necessary) and submit a CfV in time for the upcoming
>> meeting.
>
>The RfD looked pretty clean the last time I saw it.
Pretty much. The only comment I had was that one also would need to
refine DOES> in order to actually do what he outlines in the
discussion. However, looking at the current practice (divergent, see
below), and the lack of usage of RECURSE after DOES>, I think it's
better not to include such a change in the quotations RfD.
Current practice: For
: foo ( A ) DOES> ( B ) RECURSE ;
Gforth 0.7.0 and SwiftForth compile the RECURSE into a call of FOO.
VFX reports an error. The current development version of Gforth
compiles a call to the definition starting right after DOES>. We made
this change in Gforth, because it fits our new implementation approach
better, and we believe that nobody uses RECURSE after DOES> in
production code.
- anton
--
M. Anton Ertl http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
EuroForth 2016: http://www.euroforth.org/ef16/
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Implementation of LEAVE? alexinbeijing@gmail.com - 2016-06-23 02:01 -0700
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-06-23 05:45 -0500
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-06-23 11:53 +0000
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-06-23 12:06 -0500
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-23 12:19 -0700
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-06-24 03:05 -0500
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? JennyB <jennybrien@googlemail.com> - 2016-06-24 02:14 -0700
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-06-25 04:19 -0500
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? JennyB <jennybrien@googlemail.com> - 2016-06-25 03:38 -0700
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-06-25 11:00 -0500
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-06-25 17:34 +0000
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-06-26 12:14 -0500
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-06-26 16:36 -0700
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-06-26 17:57 -0700
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? Alex McDonald <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2016-06-27 14:16 +0100
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-06-27 16:12 +0000
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? Alex McDonald <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2016-06-27 22:31 +0100
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-06-27 14:21 +0000
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-06-27 11:05 -0500
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? JennyB <jennybrien@googlemail.com> - 2016-06-25 03:49 -0700
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? JennyB <jennybrien@googlemail.com> - 2016-06-24 08:45 -0700
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? JennyB <jennybrien@googlemail.com> - 2016-06-24 02:33 -0700
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-06-24 16:23 +0000
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-06-23 11:43 +0000
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? alexinbeijing@gmail.com - 2016-06-24 11:41 -0700
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-06-25 05:18 +0000
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 17:45 -0700
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-06-28 06:14 +0000
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-24 15:30 -0700
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? minforth@arcor.de - 2016-06-24 04:36 -0700
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 07:51 -0700
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2016-06-26 00:37 +0200
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 08:29 -0700
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-06-26 15:31 +1000
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-06-26 10:16 +0000
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-06-27 22:38 +1000
Re: Implementation of LEAVE? Alex Dowad <alexinbeijing@gmail.com> - 2016-06-26 13:53 -0700
csiph-web