Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #44654
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 |
| Date | Thu, 7 Jan 2016 03:14:53 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Lines | 23 |
| Message-ID | <20160107031453.7bc31f5d@_> (permalink) |
| References | <66f692be-a60d-4449-bb49-0ffd2e081bd1@googlegroups.com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | n4wpt9zq8xR26Ttf9mo2BA.user.gioia.aioe.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@aioe.org |
| X-Newsreader | Claws Mail 3.13.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) |
| X-Notice | Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.forth:44654 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:08:59 -0800 (PST) Johan Kotlinski <kotlinski@gmail.com> wrote: > Unfortunately there is one part of the standard that seems really > like a bad idea for me to follow, so I would like to pass in some > criticism here. It is the enforcing of ASCII that sits bad, since the > C64 naturally uses PETSCII. It bothers me why the Forth standard, > which is so flexible in many other areas, should be so specific about > this? The C standard does well without this requirement. Well, I think the best solution is to just use PETSCII and translate it, if you need code portability. However, if that's unreasonable, you could reprogram the graphics character set on the C64. That's how all those old C64 "graphics" games worked, e.g., Ultima. So, you could load a different set of character images, i.e, images for ASCII and so display ASCII. A simple 256 byte lookup table would translate keyboard input. Rod Pemberton
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
DurexForth v1.5.0 Johan Kotlinski <kotlinski@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 15:08 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-01-04 20:54 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Johan Kotlinski <kotlinski@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 00:48 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 04:40 -0500
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Johan Kotlinski <kotlinski@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 02:53 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 09:19 -0500
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 08:44 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 11:53 -0500
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 10:28 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 14:12 -0500
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-05 11:16 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 14:58 -0500
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-05 12:03 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 15:10 -0500
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-05 12:36 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 16:34 -0500
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Johan Kotlinski <kotlinski@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 13:42 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-01-05 16:40 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Johan Kotlinski <kotlinski@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 18:13 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-01-05 16:27 -1000
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-05 18:59 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 22:47 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-01-05 21:37 -1000
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-06 00:14 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 10:32 +0200
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-06 00:42 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 11:02 +0200
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 01:51 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 12:02 +0200
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2016-01-06 10:46 +0000
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 12:49 +0200
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 03:12 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-01-06 18:21 +0000
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Johan Kotlinski <kotlinski@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 22:57 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-01-07 08:47 +0000
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2016-01-06 13:39 +0100
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 14:45 +0200
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-06 12:48 +0000
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Syd Rumpo <usenet@nononono.co.uk> - 2016-01-07 11:09 +0000
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-01-06 22:57 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 no.top.post@gmail.com - 2016-01-14 12:45 +0000
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-01-05 10:37 +0000
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Johan Kotlinski <kotlinski@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 03:08 -0800
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Matthias Koch <matthias.koch@hot.uni-hannover.de> - 2016-01-06 12:22 +0100
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-06 13:08 +0000
Re: DurexForth v1.5.0 Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-07 03:14 -0500
csiph-web