Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #41449

Re: machineforth != forth?

Date 2015-08-21 23:23 +0100
From Jan Coombs <Jan-54 <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com>>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: machineforth != forth?
Message-ID <20150821232333.4cb0318a@HP-6550b> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <mr2q24$rce$2@dont-email.me> <1fffb5d0-9a3f-4de4-81d9-0dbf73b4df55@googlegroups.com> <b55943bb-f202-44f0-9f5e-6c8c43397974@googlegroups.com> <4ace3c81-e69b-44d4-bd1a-bd5ffd238e36@googlegroups.com> <op.x3ptddwyyfako5@localhost>

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 07:11:27 -0400
"Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> wrote:

> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:28:19 -0400, <hughaguilar96@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > An on-board Forth system can't generate machine-code because
> > it can't write into program memory --- this is a common
> > limitation in Harvard Architecture systems ---
> 
> True.

Hate to haggle, but...

I have CamelForth for test purposes on Harvard Architecture
systems. (flash 8051 boards [1]). The compiler works, and I have
no reason to think that an assembler would not. 

Jan Coombs
-- 
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_MCS-51
email valid, else fix dots and hyphen
jan4clf2014@murrayhyphenmicroftdotcodotuk

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

machineforth != forth? Mux <Yvo.Zoer@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 13:28 -0700
  Re: machineforth != forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-08-19 22:49 +0200
    Re: machineforth != forth? m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2015-08-20 00:13 -0700
      Re: machineforth != forth? Roelf Toxopeus <rt4all@notthis.hetnet.nl> - 2015-08-20 13:05 +0200
      Re: machineforth != forth? Mux <Yvo.Zoer@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:29 -0700
        Re: machineforth != forth? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-08-20 21:28 -0700
          Re: machineforth != forth? "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-08-21 07:11 -0400
            Re: machineforth != forth? Jan Coombs <Jan-54 <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com>> - 2015-08-21 23:23 +0100
              Re: machineforth != forth? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-08-21 21:06 -0700
                Re: machineforth != forth? Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 21:41 -0700
                Re: machineforth != forth? Matthias Trute <matthias.trute@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 01:29 -0700
        Re: machineforth != forth? m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2015-08-21 01:46 -0700
          Re: machineforth != forth? "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-08-21 07:19 -0400
            Re: machineforth != forth? dunno <dunno@dunno.dunno> - 2015-08-27 21:42 +0000
  Re: machineforth != forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-08-20 08:10 +0000
    Re: machineforth != forth? Roelf Toxopeus <rt4all@notthis.hetnet.nl> - 2015-08-20 14:11 +0200

csiph-web