Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #34741
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) |
| Date | 2014-12-02 06:00 +0100 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <20141202060029.7480750d@maxa-pc> (permalink) |
| References | <f357fc56-c996-4d72-a53d-194a13e276ec@googlegroups.com> <m5d9cn$o3s$1@dont-email.me> <m5dufq$vcm$1@dont-email.me> <547b4ac0$0$15842$e4fe514c@dreader35.news.xs4all.nl> <m5gcc4$66b$1@dont-email.me> |
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 01:22:40 +0100 Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> wrote: > Albert van der Horst wrote: > > > In article <m5dufq$vcm$1@dont-email.me>, WJ <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> > > wrote: > >>WJ wrote: > >> > >> > >>I apologize creating a challenge that's far too easy. > >>This one is a bit harder. > > > > Apparently the challenge is to reconstruct a specification > > from an undocumented program in a non-Forth language. > > That is a far greater challenge then writing a Forth program > > would, but I will not waste my time with it. > > It's just by-word and prints a sorted histogram. Hm, it is not clear what string-tokenize does, that is, how is string tokenized.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-29 20:13 +0000
Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) C G Montgomery <cgm@physics.utoledo.edu> - 2014-11-29 17:15 -0500
Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) Pablo Hugo Reda <pabloreda@gmail.com> - 2014-11-29 14:20 -0800
Re: Epic failure awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2014-11-29 23:35 +0100
Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-11-30 00:31 +0100
Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2014-11-29 17:41 -0800
Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) mhx@iae.nl - 2014-11-30 00:04 -0800
Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) mhx@iae.nl - 2014-11-30 00:09 -0800
Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-11-30 17:22 +0100
Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-30 02:13 +0000
Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2014-11-29 18:55 -0800
Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-11-30 16:50 +0000
Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-12-01 01:22 +0100
Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-12-02 06:00 +0100
Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-12-02 06:37 +0100
Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-12-02 12:28 +0000
Re: Epic failure Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-12-02 18:03 -0800
Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-12-05 10:10 -0800
Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-12-05 16:23 -0500
Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-05 13:46 -0800
Re: Epic failure (was Epic Fail) "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-01 07:54 +0000
Re: Epic failure awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2014-12-01 14:02 +0100
Re: Epic failure hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2014-12-01 15:04 -0800
Re: Epic failure awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2014-12-02 04:54 +0100
csiph-web