Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #126355 > unrolled thread

Re: Good C compiler for WIN64

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2018-02-08 00:09 +0800
    Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 shinobi@f153.n1.z21.fsxnet (shinobi) - 2018-02-08 08:19 +1200
      Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2018-02-08 19:07 +0800
      Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-02-08 10:24 -0800
        Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 shinobi@f153.n1.z21.fsxnet (shinobi) - 2018-02-08 20:01 +1200

#126355 — Re: Good C compiler for WIN64

On 7/2/2018 07:14, shinobi wrote:
> My ideal target is something that would fit to a floppy.
> Generally something in the size of several Megabytes.
>
> And possibly even easy or no installation at all.

Is it just about a toy project? Or are you making something that sells?

Turbo C++ 3.0 is free now. It should fit into a 1.44M diskette.

<https://www.google.com.hk/search?q=Turbo+c%2B%2B+3.0>

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
   ^ ^   (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10)  Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#126423

 MM> Is it just about a toy project? Or are you making something that sells?
 MM> 
 MM> Turbo C++ 3.0 is free now. It should fit into a 1.44M diskette.

That's a great tip. I don't want to compile anything really large. Just one
file that displays ANSI graphics. It's not a single problem on Linux.

However when I try this on Windows I'm getting headache. Tiny C Compiler
doesn't have NCURSES. And I was thinking about to transfer it to it.

Then I tried GNU solutions. I went with CYGWIN64. The catch is that I won't
be able to redistribute the program without cygwin.dll. That's not feasible 
either. I'll take a look at Turbo C++ 3.0. But I guess it won't have NCURSES
for a change.

So that's my little problem.

Thanks anyway

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#126428

On 8/2/2018 04:19, shinobi wrote:
> That's a great tip. I don't want to compile anything really large. Just one
> file that displays ANSI graphics. It's not a single problem on Linux.
>
> However when I try this on Windows I'm getting headache. Tiny C Compiler
> doesn't have NCURSES. And I was thinking about to transfer it to it.

If you could go Linux, the C world is a lot bigger there.

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
   ^ ^   (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10)  Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#126451

shinobi@f153.n1.z21.fsxnet (shinobi) writes:
>  MM> Is it just about a toy project? Or are you making something that sells?
>  MM> 
>  MM> Turbo C++ 3.0 is free now. It should fit into a 1.44M diskette.
>
> That's a great tip. I don't want to compile anything really large. Just one
> file that displays ANSI graphics. It's not a single problem on Linux.
>
> However when I try this on Windows I'm getting headache. Tiny C Compiler
> doesn't have NCURSES. And I was thinking about to transfer it to it.
>
> Then I tried GNU solutions. I went with CYGWIN64. The catch is that I won't
> be able to redistribute the program without cygwin.dll. That's not feasible 
> either. I'll take a look at Turbo C++ 3.0. But I guess it won't have NCURSES
> for a change.

Your mention of floppy disks in your original post caused a lot of
confusion.  You're not really using floppies, are you?  It sounds like
you just need something fairly small due to your limited disk space.
(In another article you said your hard drive is 32GB, with 24GB taken up
by Windows.  Your free space is still orders of magnitude bigger than a
floppy.)

If I recall correctly, Turbo C++ is badly out of date.  You'll need to
decide whether that's a problem for you.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#126460

 KT> Your mention of floppy disks in your original post caused a lot of
 KT> confusion.  You're not really using floppies, are you?  It sounds like

No, I don't the reason was I imagined something that would have like 1MB.

I don't really thing C compiler has to be any bigger. And in the case of
Tiny C Compiler the distribution file itself has something like 500KB.

That's just perfectly what I meant. Now I have to solve my knowledge gap
in Terminal control.

Thanks for response

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c

csiph-web