Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #89903 > unrolled thread

OT: Evolution disproven

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c

Contents

  OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 09:26 -0700
    Re: OT: Evolution disproven bert <bert.hutchings@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-01 09:46 -0700
    Re: OT: Evolution disproven Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-01 10:02 -0700
      Re: OT: Evolution disproven Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-07-01 20:06 +0200
        Re: OT: Evolution disproven Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-01 12:33 -0700
    Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 10:06 -0700
      Re: OT: Evolution disproven John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 12:36 -0700
        Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 12:43 -0700
          Re: OT: Evolution disproven John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 13:09 -0700
            Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 14:34 -0700
        Re: OT: Evolution disproven "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-07-01 15:48 -0400
          Re: OT: Evolution disproven jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-07-04 00:11 +0200
            Re: OT: Evolution disproven Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-07-03 23:15 +0100
              Re: OT: Evolution disproven Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2016-07-04 09:31 +0800
              Re: OT: Evolution disproven gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-07-04 04:50 +0000
            Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 15:39 -0700
              Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-03 23:54 -0700
        Re: OT: Evolution disproven Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-04 19:20 +0100
          Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 07:00 -0700
            Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 07:32 -0700
            Re: OT: Evolution disproven gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-07-05 15:39 +0000
              Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 09:11 -0700
                See sig (Was: OT: Evolution disproven) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-07-05 17:48 +0000
              Re: OT: Evolution disproven Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-07-06 17:53 -0400
                Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-06 18:44 -0700
          What is a troll? (Was: OT: Evolution disproven) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-07-05 15:43 +0000
    Re: OT: Evolution disproven supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-07-01 10:43 -0700
      Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 10:54 -0700
        Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 11:01 -0700
          Re: OT: Evolution disproven Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-07-01 20:04 +0200
            Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 11:08 -0700
              Re: OT: Evolution disproven Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-07-01 20:13 +0200
                Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 11:36 -0700
                  Re: OT: Evolution disproven Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-07-01 21:05 +0200
                    Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 12:38 -0700
                Re: OT: Evolution disproven Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-01 11:44 -0700
                  Re: OT: Evolution disproven Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-07-01 21:49 +0100
          Re: OT: Evolution disproven Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-07-01 19:09 +0100
            Re: OT: Evolution disproven Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-07-01 19:20 +0100
            Re: OT: Evolution disproven Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2016-07-02 02:34 +0800
    Re: OT: Evolution disproven Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-07-01 19:03 +0100
    Re: OT: Evolution disproven John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 11:36 -0700
      Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 11:40 -0700
        Re: OT: Evolution disproven Mark Storkamp <mstorkamp@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-01 13:58 -0500
          Re: OT: Evolution disproven jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-07-02 23:44 +0200
            Re: OT: Evolution disproven Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2016-07-02 16:07 -0600
            Re: OT: Evolution disproven Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-02 17:12 -0700
              Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-02 17:24 -0700
                Re: OT: Evolution disproven Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-02 18:56 -0700
                  Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-02 19:12 -0700
                  Re: OT: Evolution disproven Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-07-06 17:00 -0400
                    Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 14:15 -0700
      Re: OT: Evolution disproven Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-07-01 21:30 +0100
      Re: OT: Evolution disproven Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-01 19:30 -0400
    Re: OT: Evolution disproven jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-07-02 00:25 +0200
      Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 15:36 -0700
        Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-03 01:27 -0700
          Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 02:58 -0700
            Re: OT: Evolution disproven Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 12:16 +0100
              Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 06:13 -0700
                Re: OT: Evolution disproven Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 17:53 +0100
                  Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 10:21 -0700
                Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-03 12:49 -0700
                  Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-03 12:51 -0700
                    Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 13:04 -0700
                      Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 13:20 -0700
                    Re: OT: Evolution disproven Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-07-06 17:04 -0400
                      Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-06 19:08 -0700
                        Re: OT: Evolution disproven Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-06 19:30 -0700
                          Re: OT: Evolution disproven David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-07-07 08:55 +0200
                        Re: OT: Evolution disproven Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-07-11 17:56 -0400
                      Re: OT: Evolution disproven Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-07 14:49 +1200
                        Re: OT: Evolution disproven Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-07 04:38 +0100
                          Re: OT: Evolution disproven David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-07-07 09:19 +0200
                            Re: OT: Evolution disproven luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 00:50 -0700
                          Re: OT: Evolution disproven Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-07 19:27 +1200
                            Re: OT: Evolution disproven Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-07-11 19:05 -0400
                          Re: OT: Evolution disproven jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-07-10 18:14 +0200
                            Re: OT: Evolution disproven Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-10 17:42 +0100
                            Re: OT: Evolution disproven Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-10 12:06 -0700
                            Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 12:16 -0700
                        Re: OT: Evolution disproven Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-07-11 17:57 -0400
                  Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 12:58 -0700
                    Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-03 13:15 -0700
                      Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 13:21 -0700
                      Re: OT: Evolution disproven jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-07-03 23:59 +0200
                        Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-04 00:10 -0700
      Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-01 15:36 -0700
      Re: OT: Evolution disproven Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-07-02 08:54 +0100
    Re: OT: Evolution disproven Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-07-06 16:45 -0400
      Re: OT: Evolution disproven Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-07-06 22:06 +0100
        Re: OT: Evolution disproven gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-07-06 22:09 +0000
    Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 05:43 -0700
      Re: OT: Evolution disproven David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-07-07 16:18 +0200
        Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 07:22 -0700
    Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-05 16:11 -0700
      Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-05 16:42 -0700
      Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-05 17:45 -0700
        Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 02:03 -0800
          Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 03:40 -0800

Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →

#90036

In article <9ed029a3-2ee8-4965-aef5-bb578086bbb0@googlegroups.com>,
Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Monday, July 4, 2016 at 2:20:47 PM UTC-4, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> And, John, you're arguing with a troll. Worse, you're arguing with a 
>> troll who genuinely believes that his cause is just. You /cannot/ win 
>> such an argument, no matter how right you are. Best to let it go.
>
>I doubt Richard will read this, but I post this reply to him, and to
>those who would read this:

See sig...

-- 
I am not a troll.
    Rick C. Hodgin
I am not a crook.
    Rick M. Nixon

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#90040

On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:39:44 AM UTC-4, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> In article <9ed029a3-2ee8-4965-aef5-bb578086bbb0@googlegroups.com>,
> Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Monday, July 4, 2016 at 2:20:47 PM UTC-4, Richard Heathfield wrote:
> >> And, John, you're arguing with a troll. Worse, you're arguing with a 
> >> troll who genuinely believes that his cause is just. You /cannot/ win 
> >> such an argument, no matter how right you are. Best to let it go.
> >
> >I doubt Richard will read this, but I post this reply to him, and to
> >those who would read this:
> 
> See sig...
> 
> -- 
> I am not a troll.
>     Rick C. Hodgin
> I am not a crook.
>     Rick M. Nixon

I love you, Kenny.  But Jesus loves you more.  If you were to ask Him how
much He loves you, He would stretch out His arms as wide as they'll go,
and look into your eyes and say, "This much."

He will forgive your sin and give you eternal life, Kenny.  It's my best
offering to you in this world.  And I'm glad to have the opportunity to
point you to Him.  I pray you receive it.

Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#90042 — See sig (Was: OT: Evolution disproven)

In article <75cb74ab-ba85-4868-a1d7-6f8d99df8d70@googlegroups.com>,
Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote:
...
>> I am not a troll.
>>     Rick C. Hodgin
>> I am not a crook.
>>     Rick M. Nixon

Best CLC post - ever!

--- Cut Here ---
On Sunday, November 1, 2015 at 9:33:11 AM UTC-5, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> In article <dabbd888-c9c6-4e59-81d8-4671b4d4d7b1@googlegroups.com>,
> Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
> >David, I love you.  I will continue to keep you in my prayers.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >Rick C. Hodgin
> 
> I think David should ask you out on a date.  Then you guys can settle this
> thing in-person, like the manly men that you are.
> 
> Your using CLC for cyber is getting rather anxiety-generating for the rest of us.

You consider such things because you don't know what real love is, Kenny.
You've never met Jesus Christ and, therefore, can only look to the forms
the enemy teaches you as being valid.  You hold these primary and out
front in application as the dominant forms of love which exist, thereby
casting something like the mention of one man loving another man
immediately into the realm of that which is inappropriate.  You do so
because there is an enemy spirit at work in this world which guides men
towards those ends through sin, and in this case he is guiding you. The
only way to overcome it is is through faith in Jesus Christ, and the
born again nature, and that comes from seeking the truth honestly, with
your whole heart.

Kenny, you do not have the born again nature, and therefore you can only
look at things in the false form as by the guiding hand of the enemy at
work in your flesh, because you cannot discern or know God's call unto
your spirit.  If you were born again (of the spirit), then His Holy Spirit
would guide you into a proper understanding, and you would know that the
ways of the enemy are false, and the ways of God are true.

I pray you do seek the truth and come to this realization at some point.
I would like to see you in Heaven.

Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
--- Cut Here ---

-- 

First of all, I do not appreciate your playing stupid here at all.

	- Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn -

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#90102

On 7/5/2016 11:39 AM, Kenny McCormack wrote:
[...]
> See sig...
>
> --
> I am not a troll.
>     Rick C. Hodgin
> I am not a crook.
>     Rick M. Nixon

"I am not a meth lab".

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/ce/51/d3/ce51d3d91a882622aa1db7d75a688ca8.jpg

-- 
Kenneth Brody

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#90104

On 7/6/2016 2:53 PM, Ken Brody wrote:
> On 7/5/2016 11:39 AM, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> [...]
>> See sig...
>>
>> --
>> I am not a troll.
>>     Rick C. Hodgin
>> I am not a crook.
>>     Rick M. Nixon
>
> "I am not a meth lab".
>
> https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/ce/51/d3/ce51d3d91a882622aa1db7d75a688ca8.jpg

LOL! :^O

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#90037 — What is a troll? (Was: OT: Evolution disproven)

In article <nle9dk$v2v$1@dont-email.me>,
Richard Heathfield  <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wrote:
...
>> You are conflating multiple concepts under the umbrella of "evolution"
>
>And, John, you're arguing with a troll. Worse, you're arguing with a 
>troll who genuinely believes that his cause is just. You /cannot/ win 
>such an argument, no matter how right you are. Best to let it go.

Actually, by most definitions, if you actually believe that Rick actually
believes what he is posting, then you must conclude that he is *not* a
"troll".

The more or less standard definition of a "troll" is someone who posts
things he *doesn't* actually believe - in the hopes of stirring up trouble.

-- 
Pensacola - the thinking man's drink.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#89911

On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 11:26:50 AM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> When held up to scientific scrutiny, evolution is shown to be categorically
> false:

Some of the biological diversity of life on this planet is known to be a
result of evolutionary processes, since it has occurred recently enough
to be observed.

Some of the biological diversity of life on this planet is most likely a
result of other causes which are not all understood.

I don't think any reasonable person should dispute either of those
statements, but for some reason both sides of the "debate" seem to
regard them as irreconcilable.

Of course, biological evolution is nothing compared with the evolution of
C compiler philosophy, which is an even more controversial topic.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#89912

On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 1:44:08 PM UTC-4, supe...@casperkitty.com wrote:
> On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 11:26:50 AM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> > When held up to scientific scrutiny, evolution is shown to be categorically
> > false:

I would add that it is the study of the field of genetics which is proving it
to be categorically false.  Even people like Richard Dawkins are now looking
toward the intelligent design angle, though he purports it was done by aliens
who, themselves, evolved as by a type of Darwinian molecules-to-man evolution
before then seeding the rest of the galaxy.

Anything to destroy God.  It's what you would expect from an active enemy
at work to send people's eternal souls to Hell.

-----

> Some of the biological diversity of life on this planet is known to be a
> result of evolutionary processes, since it has occurred recently enough
> to be observed.

What is your basis for this statement?

> Some of the biological diversity of life on this planet is most likely a
> result of other causes which are not all understood.

What is your basis for this statement?

Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#89913

On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 1:54:45 PM UTC-4, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 1:44:08 PM UTC-4, supe...@casperkitty.com wrote:
> > On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 11:26:50 AM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> > > When held up to scientific scrutiny, evolution is shown to be categorically
> > > false:
> 
> I would add that it is the study of the field of genetics which is proving it
> to be categorically false.  Even people like Richard Dawkins are now looking
> toward the intelligent design angle, though he purports it was done by aliens
> who, themselves, evolved as by a type of Darwinian molecules-to-man evolution
> before then seeding the rest of the galaxy.
> 
> Anything to destroy God.  It's what you would expect from an active enemy
> at work to send people's eternal souls to Hell.

Here is a video which backs up the claims I make above.  In this video, Dr.
Purdom goes through a few on a long list of examples which disprove evolution
and the claims made by genetic evolution without a designer:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=deV99oPnKlI

There are certain fundamental processes which could not have come into
existence without design, namely the alphabet of genetic code, the language
used for protein creation, and the myriad of design aspects which are
controlled by genetic cues that are so complex that in some cases even a
single A/T or G/C sequence being missing will cause a non-viable offspring.

Genetic structure is as mind-bogglingly complex as the universe is large.
Our minds cannot wrap around it, and the complexities involved are beyond
imagination.  And that's just for one lifeform.  Then you get into the
exceedingly subtle variations between different lifeforms, of which any
of those are off by even a molecular sequence and they too fail to produce
a viable offspring.

God is the creator.  Science proves everything that the God of the Bible
has said is true.

I encourage each of you to seek the matter out for yourself.  Seek the
truth and you too will see.

Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#89914

On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> God is the creator.  Science proves everything that the God of the
> Bible has said is true.
> 
God of the Bible is joke...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#89917

On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 2:04:44 PM UTC-4, Melzzzzz wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
> "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > God is the creator.  Science proves everything that the God of the
> > Bible has said is true.
>
> God of the Bible is joke...

Only to some.  Who are they?  They are the perishing natural man.

    http://biblehub.com/kjv/1_corinthians/2-14.htm
    "But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God:
     for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because
     they are spiritually discerned."

    http://biblehub.com/kjv/1_corinthians/1-18.htm
    "For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness;
     but unto us which are saved it is the power of God."

You are on your way to Hell, Melzzzzz, because you will not believe in
the One who came to save your eternal soul.  You reject Him, and He will
reject you before God the Father.

    http://biblehub.com/kjv/matthew/10-33.htm
    "But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before
     my Father which is in heaven."

Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#89919

On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> You are on your way to Hell, Melzzzzz, because you will not believe in
> the One who came to save your eternal soul.  You reject Him, and He
> will reject you before God the Father.

Who cares...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#89923

On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 2:14:00 PM UTC-4, Melzzzzz wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
> "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > You are on your way to Hell, Melzzzzz, because you will not believe in
> > the One who came to save your eternal soul.  You reject Him, and He
> > will reject you before God the Father.
> 
> Who cares...

I care about you, Melzzzzz.  I care about your eternal soul.  I care about
your future.  I care about you not being deceived by an evil, ruthless
enemy who does not care about you, but is really trying to harm you.

I care about you, Melzzzzz.  I would like to see you in Heaven.

Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#89927

On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 2:14:00 PM UTC-4, Melzzzzz wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
> > "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > 
> > > You are on your way to Hell, Melzzzzz, because you will not
> > > believe in the One who came to save your eternal soul.  You
> > > reject Him, and He will reject you before God the Father.  
> > 
> > Who cares...  
> 
> I care about you, Melzzzzz.  I care about your eternal soul.
I don't have eternal soul...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#89930

On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 3:06:04 PM UTC-4, Melzzzzz wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
> "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 2:14:00 PM UTC-4, Melzzzzz wrote:
> > > On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
> > > "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > 
> > > > You are on your way to Hell, Melzzzzz, because you will not
> > > > believe in the One who came to save your eternal soul.  You
> > > > reject Him, and He will reject you before God the Father.  
> > > 
> > > Who cares...  
> > 
> > I care about you, Melzzzzz.  I care about your eternal soul.
> I don't have eternal soul...

Watch the video.  It will teach you that you do have an eternal soul.
It will also teach you why the popular world view teaches something
else.

There really is a battle on for you, Melzzzzz.  You really are that
important.

Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#89925

Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> writes:
[...]
> Who cares...

Please stop feeding the troll.  Replying to his posts is no better
than what he's doing.  (Yes, I'm also replying.  This will be my
one and only post in this thread, with the vague hope of reducing
the noise level.)

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#89935

On 01/07/2016 19:44, Keith Thompson wrote:
> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> writes:
> [...]
>> Who cares...
> Please stop feeding the troll.  Replying to his posts is no better
> than what he's doing.  (Yes, I'm also replying.  This will be my
> one and only post in this thread, with the vague hope of reducing
> the noise level.)
>

but he couldn't find anybody to feed here because there is nothing about 
C on this newsgroup.  Can you see anything about C here.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#89918

On 01/07/2016 19:01, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> God is the creator. Science proves everything that the God of the 
> Bible has said is true. I encourage each of you to seek the matter out 
> for yourself. Seek the truth and you too will see. Best regards,

So Einstein was right when he said "God does not play dice".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#89920

On 01/07/2016 19:09, Real Troll wrote:
> On 01/07/2016 19:01, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>> God is the creator. Science proves everything that the God of the 
>> Bible has said is true. I encourage each of you to seek the matter 
>> out for yourself. Seek the truth and you too will see. Best regards,
>
> So Einstein was right when he said "God does not play dice".
>

Hawking says:


> One could calculate probabilities, but one could not make any definite 
> predictions. Thus, the future of the universe is not completely 
> determined by the laws of science, and its present state, as Laplace 
> thought. God still has a few tricks up his sleeve.

<http://www.hawking.org.uk/does-god-play-dice.html>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#89921

Real Troll wrote:

> On 01/07/2016 19:01, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>> God is the creator. Science proves everything that the God of the
>> Bible has said is true. I encourage each of you to seek the matter out
>> for yourself. Seek the truth and you too will see. Best regards,
> 
> So Einstein was right when he said "God does not play dice".

He was right when talking about human stupidity. Rick has just again proven 
that is infinite
-- 
Reinhardt

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c

csiph-web