Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #74654 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-02 08:05 -0800 |
| Last post | 2015-11-10 16:31 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 111 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c
What's the purpose of CAlive? Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 08:05 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-02 16:08 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Jay Braun <lyngwyst@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 08:18 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 09:00 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 08:50 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-11-05 14:36 +0100
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 05:55 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-11-06 11:57 +0100
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-06 11:20 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-11-06 11:45 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-06 12:03 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-11-06 13:34 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-06 14:35 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-11-06 15:43 +0100
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 07:05 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-06 15:15 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-06 08:34 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-07 00:24 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2015-11-05 21:33 -0700
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-11-06 11:54 +0100
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-11-06 12:01 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-11-06 14:11 +0100
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-11-10 16:17 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 08:24 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 14:51 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-11-18 01:18 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 21:06 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 02:34 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? mark.bluemel@gmail.com - 2015-11-18 03:36 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 04:02 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 06:14 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 06:18 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 19:07 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 11:14 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 11:27 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? August Karlstrom <fusionfile@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 21:57 +0100
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 13:06 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-11-05 22:12 +0100
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-05 13:24 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 13:27 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-11-06 13:51 +0100
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 13:25 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-11-06 14:00 +0100
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 05:14 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-11-06 13:33 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-11-06 14:14 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 06:28 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 06:52 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-06 08:45 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-05 15:43 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 15:59 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 16:11 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 16:35 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 16:12 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-05 20:28 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 20:40 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-05 21:02 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 21:53 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 23:43 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 03:27 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-07 10:51 +1300
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 14:04 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-11-07 13:33 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 14:00 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-08 11:26 +1300
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 14:33 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-07 14:45 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 14:58 -0800
[way OT] Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-08 14:05 +1300
Re: [way OT] Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-08 00:05 -0800
Re: [way OT] Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-08 21:44 +1300
Re: [way OT] Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-11-10 16:22 +0000
Re: [way OT] Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-11-08 07:06 -0600
Re: [way OT] Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-11-08 06:02 -0800
Re: [way OT] Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-08 07:45 -0800
Re: [way OT] Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 09:40 -0800
Re: [way OT] Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-08 11:32 -0800
Re: [way OT] Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 11:43 -0800
Re: [way OT] Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-11-08 21:14 +0100
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-07 15:07 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 15:14 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-11-10 16:27 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 08:35 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-10 09:05 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-11-07 23:18 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-11-10 16:20 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 08:28 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-11-07 23:20 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 15:41 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-11-07 16:13 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 16:20 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 16:27 -0800
Bartenders? (Was: What's the purpose of CAlive?) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-11-08 01:25 +0000
Re: Bartenders? (Was: What's the purpose of CAlive?) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 17:54 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-07 16:01 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 16:05 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-11-07 16:08 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2015-11-08 09:59 +0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-11-06 10:50 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-11-06 10:54 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-07 00:37 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-11-07 10:00 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? bartekltg <bartekltg@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 15:01 +0100
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-11-06 08:12 -0600
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? bartekltg <bartekltg@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 19:29 +0100
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? August Karlstrom <fusionfile@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 09:33 +0100
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-07 01:47 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 06:20 -0800
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-11-06 16:24 +0000
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? bartekltg <bartekltg@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 19:41 +0100
Re: What's the purpose of CAlive? raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-11-10 16:31 +0000
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
| From | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 15:14 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <19c464f0-89c1-4fa3-916c-26c905583928@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #75307 |
On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Keith Thompson wrote:
> Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> writes:
> > Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> [...]
> > You'd better start by asking "him" (why not "her"?) for the billions of
> > dollars such a project would require.
>
> Ian, please don't feed the troll (or whatever he is).
Keith, I am a prayerful servant of Jesus Christ. I pray you come to
know Him as Lord and Savior. I would like to see you in Heaven.
First. Jesus first in each of our lives:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbWQV3OiRqA&index=22&list=PL4QXN2CVPii7zbX3SmNkyaZcomT2Jj1-8
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 16:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <56421a8d.6098015@news.xs4all.nl> |
| In reply to | #75308 |
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Keith Thompson wrote: > > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> writes: > > > Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > > [...] > > > You'd better start by asking "him" (why not "her"?) for the billions of > > > dollars such a project would require. > > > > Ian, please don't feed the troll (or whatever he is). > > Keith, I am a prayerful servant of Jesus Christ. No, you're not. You're a hateful servant of the Separator. > I would like to see you in Heaven. First, try to get there. Preaching isn't the solution; taking thy neighbour seriously _as a human being_ rather than as a target for sermons, is. Richard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 08:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <dd3ff460-1476-488f-987e-3d0616a25f3e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #75596 |
On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 11:28:33 AM UTC-5, Richard Bos wrote: > "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Keith Thompson wrote: > > > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> writes: > > > > Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > > > [...] > > > > You'd better start by asking "him" (why not "her"?) for the billions of > > > > dollars such a project would require. > > > > > > Ian, please don't feed the troll (or whatever he is). > > > > Keith, I am a prayerful servant of Jesus Christ. > > No, you're not. You're a hateful servant of the Separator. > > > I would like to see you in Heaven. > > First, try to get there. Preaching isn't the solution; taking thy > neighbour seriously _as a human being_ rather than as a target for > sermons, is. > > Richard The only way one can take their neighbor seriously, as a human being, is to recognize that they are no merely flesh, but they are comprised also of an eternal soul, and a spirit. And then from within that full realization, the one which is provided to a person only by the guidance and teaching of God's Holy Spirit, can that person proceed rightly in knowing how to help his neighbor. It is from that place I proceed, Richard, which is why you cannot see any value or help in my offering ... because you are spiritually blind, and are under the full delusion provide for by the enemy, the one that would keep the person in a burning building from receiving rescue ladder reaching up to their third story window. Instead of receiving that which they need, help and evacuation from the burning building, they pull out a rifle and start shooting at the firefighters who are there to save them, believing in their mind they'll be fine, only to find out at some point soon after that they are going to die, and now there is no hope for them. Christians who profess the path of Jesus Christ, of coming to Him in repentance, and in asking Him for forgiveness for their sin, are those firefighters. We are reaching out to all people in the burning buildings. We teach the way of truth, the way of safety. And for all who will hear the truth in our call, the same will come to the window, board the ladder, and be saved. The rest will not. They will close the window, seal up the curtains, go to their favorite couch, and wait to be burned alive. I pray you open your eyes, Richard, and seek the truth. You are on a path right now that will end in your eternal destruction in Hell. Unless you open your eyes and seek the truth, you will come to perilous and undesirable ends. I pray that you do seek the truth, and do come to Jesus Christ repenting and asking forgiveness, because I would like to see you in Heaven. Best regards, Rick C. Hodgin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 09:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ln8u65vl7m.fsf@kst-u.example.com> |
| In reply to | #75596 |
raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) writes:
> "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Keith Thompson wrote:
>> > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> writes:
>> > > Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > > You'd better start by asking "him" (why not "her"?) for the billions of
>> > > dollars such a project would require.
>> >
>> > Ian, please don't feed the troll (or whatever he is).
>>
>> Keith, I am a prayerful servant of Jesus Christ.
>
> No, you're not. You're a hateful servant of the Separator.
Richard. Stop. Feeding. The. Troll.
Or perhaps more accurately, stop *being* a troll. If you want to
debate religion with Rick, do it elsewhere.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 23:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n1m0sm$glh$1@news.xmission.com> |
| In reply to | #75307 |
In article <ln37wh1k8v.fsf@kst-u.example.com>, Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote: >Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> writes: >> Rick C. Hodgin wrote: >[...] >> You'd better start by asking "him" (why not "her"?) for the billions of >> dollars such a project would require. > >Ian, please don't feed the troll (or whatever he is). Keith, give it up. Rick has destroyed this newsgroup, just as surely as Donald Trump has destroyed the Republican Party. And using pretty much the same techniques in both cases. It really is a thing of beauty (in both cases). -- > No, I haven't, that's why I'm asking questions. If you won't help me, > why don't you just go find your lost manhood elsewhere. CLC in a nutshell.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 16:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <56421901.5702218@news.xs4all.nl> |
| In reply to | #75303 |
Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> wrote: > You'd better start by asking "him" (why not "her"?) If you read the Bible in the actual, original grammar, you'd be surprised. Rick, of course, would scoff, as he does at everything which isn't his personal mis-translation. Richard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 08:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <38a5b827-d5f2-4272-a42a-4dfdd94956a7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #75593 |
On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 11:20:29 AM UTC-5, Richard Bos wrote: > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > You'd better start by asking "him" (why not "her"?) > > If you read the Bible in the actual, original grammar, you'd be > surprised. Rick, of course, would scoff, as he does at everything which > isn't his personal mis-translation. > > Richard The Bible conveys a Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The church is the bride of Christ in eternity, which is why we have the pattern of marriage here upon the Earth. He is our Bridegroom. Those who are redeemed from the enemy's lies and clutches, who seek the truth and are saved by coming to Jesus Christ for forgiveness, will be married to Him in eternity, in the same way that marriages here on Earth take place ... namely that all she possesses become his, and all he possesses become hers, because they are joined together and are one. The story of Jesus Christ is NOT what the enemy has taught. It is that which the Holy Spirit has taught through men. And if you will seek after the truth with your whole heart, then you too will find it. Best regards, Rick C. Hodgin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 23:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n1m0vt$glh$2@news.xmission.com> |
| In reply to | #75294 |
In article <MPG.30a80df07f6f0fe38d@news.eternal-september.org>, Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> wrote: ... >Many, probably most, of the people who designed and built the >microprocessor you are using are not Christian. It was probably designed >in Israel. Is that really true? Do you have a reference for it? (Not that I am doubting you; I am genuinely curious) But, anyway, it don't bother him none; he intends to start with sand and build it all from there. -- The last time a Republican cared about you, you were a fetus.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 15:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <fb57334d-2945-4954-8b68-5f8b0b25bd75@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #75310 |
On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 6:20:36 PM UTC-5, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> [snip]
> ...he intends to start with sand and
> build it all from there.
I intend to start with a firm faith in Jesus Christ, and then proceed
to discussion with like fellows, which lead to ideas and thought, all
of which are held before Him in how to proceed.
Personally, I believe a sapphire-based solution is the way to go,
possibly silicon-on-sapphire, but possibly something else. When
God walked upon the Earth in the Old Testament, where His feet
touched the ground, it was changed into sapphire:
http://biblehub.com/exodus/24-10.htm
"And they saw the God of Israel: and there was under his feet
as it were a paved work of a sapphire stone, and as it were
the body of heaven in his clearness."
The vision Ezekiel had when he saw the throne above the awesome
sea of crystal, there was a throne, and it looked like sapphire:
http://biblehub.com/ezekiel/1-26.htm
"And above the firmament that was over their heads was the
likeness of a throne, as the appearance of a sapphire stone:
and upon the likeness of the throne was the likeness as the
appearance of a man above upon it."
Peregrine Semiconductor has already demonstrated the benefits of
silicon-on-sapphire:
Ron Reedy of Peregrine gives a laymen's talk on the technology:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1donjejh_U8
I've also had the thought that the third temple, described in much
greater detail in scripture than the other two temples, may relate
to a circuit. It describes, for example, windows of narrowing
thickness, with other components which were palm trees:
http://biblehub.com/ezekiel/40-16.htm
"And there were narrow windows to the little chambers, and to
their posts within the gate round about, and likewise to the
arches: and windows were round about inward: and upon each post
were palm trees."
This described structure is massive, and some have made 3D renderings
of it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNmERZkT6JM
At 2:48 it shows 30 dining rooms. It does not include the back
fourth wall, but if it did there would be 40 dining rooms, and
I had the vision back in 2014 which later led me to pursue my
40-bit extension LibSF 386-x40 CPU design.
If you look closely, and consider things from this perspective,
you can also see there are parts around it which look like
semiconductor structures:
http://spectrum.ieee.org/image/1951321
http://www.intechopen.com/source/html/44512/media/image2.png
It just occurred to me one day while watching that YouTube video.
I thought how much the entire temple layout looked like a
semiconductor circuit.
However, I could be completely wrong in that thinking. And I
would be content to be wrong about it. It just struck me.
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 16:13 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30a8337d1e1053bf91@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #75311 |
Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > Kenny McCormack wrote: > > ...he intends to start with sand and > > build it all from there. > > I intend to start with a firm faith in Jesus Christ, and then proceed > to discussion with like fellows ... Then why are you /here/? :-) > Personally, I believe a sapphire-based solution is the way to go, > possibly silicon-on-sapphire, but possibly something else. When > God walked upon the Earth in the Old Testament, where His feet > touched the ground, it was changed into sapphire: > > http://biblehub.com/exodus/24-10.htm > "And they saw the God of Israel: and there was under his feet > as it were a paved work of a sapphire stone, and as it were > the body of heaven in his clearness." That probably meant Lapis lazuli, which is probably completely unsuitable for silicon-on-sapphire. An interesting connection, though. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sapphire
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 16:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3fd5f354-52df-4705-a781-afeca945785e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #75315 |
On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 7:13:41 PM UTC-5, Philip Lantz wrote: > Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > > Kenny McCormack wrote: > > > ...he intends to start with sand and > > > build it all from there. > > > > I intend to start with a firm faith in Jesus Christ, and then proceed > > to discussion with like fellows ... > > Then why are you /here/? :-) > > > Personally, I believe a sapphire-based solution is the way to go, > > possibly silicon-on-sapphire, but possibly something else. When > > God walked upon the Earth in the Old Testament, where His feet > > touched the ground, it was changed into sapphire: > > > > http://biblehub.com/exodus/24-10.htm > > "And they saw the God of Israel: and there was under his feet > > as it were a paved work of a sapphire stone, and as it were > > the body of heaven in his clearness." > > That probably meant Lapis lazuli, which is probably completely > unsuitable for silicon-on-sapphire. An interesting connection, > though. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sapphire The fact that it was pure and crystal clear makes me think it wasn't Lapis lazuli. I think that's why the King James translators also used that word, and also why the NIV translators used Lapis lazuli (because there are many things in the NIV which literally reverse the prior translations, even taking crucial verses completely out, changing fundamentally the meaning / teaching). Best regards, Rick C. Hodgin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 16:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c168f8b9-4f97-4896-afa1-e20324bc9f3c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #75315 |
On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 7:13:41 PM UTC-5, Philip Lantz wrote:
> Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> > Kenny McCormack wrote:
> > > ...he intends to start with sand and
> > > build it all from there.
> >
> > I intend to start with a firm faith in Jesus Christ, and then proceed
> > to discussion with like fellows ...
>
> Then why are you /here/? :-)
I didn't see this in my first reply.
I am on comp.arch because that's where semiconductor architects are. I
post about these things waiting for the one(s) who will come forward and
say, "I have the technical expertise" or "I have the capital" and then,
"Let's do it."
Until then, it is the area where such discussions take place.
I have expertise in software, so I am here on comp.lang.c talking about
software because I program in Visual FoxPro and C (using a C++ compiler)
for about 99% of all of my programming.
I am using the expertise I have, where I have it, yet doing it for the
Lord, which is His call upon our life (whatever situation we were in
when we came to faith in, remain there). I was 34 before I became a
believer, and I had a many-year established software history, which is
the reason why I have been content to continue developing in/on Windows
and Linux during this time as I write my own products, because the Lord
called me from that place knowing my great desire to write alternatives,
and having been doing so for years in DOS and Windows.
http://biblehub.com/1_corinthians/7-20.htm
"Let every man abide in the same calling wherein he was called."
God receives people where they are. He leads them out of sin and
toward holiness, but if their vocation is not something like stripping,
prostitution, a bar tender, a thief, etc., then you can remain where
you were ... just now do it for Him.
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 01:25 +0000 |
| Subject | Bartenders? (Was: What's the purpose of CAlive?) |
| Message-ID | <n1m8at$l6f$1@news.xmission.com> |
| In reply to | #75319 |
In article <c168f8b9-4f97-4896-afa1-e20324bc9f3c@googlegroups.com>, Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote: ... >God receives people where they are. He leads them out of sin and >toward holiness, but if their vocation is not something like stripping, >prostitution, a bar tender, a thief, etc., then you can remain where >you were ... just now do it for Him. Note the subtle slam against bartenders... The Donald would be proud. -- "Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in TARP money, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in bonuses, and paid no taxes? Yeah, me neither."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 17:54 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Bartenders? (Was: What's the purpose of CAlive?) |
| Message-ID | <b69d47a4-78a4-4047-8942-9db4de4d1df3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #75328 |
On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 8:26:02 PM UTC-5, Kenny McCormack wrote: > In article <c168f8b9-4f97-4896-afa1-e20324bc9f3c@googlegroups.com>, > Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote: > ... > >God receives people where they are. He leads them out of sin and > >toward holiness, but if their vocation is not something like stripping, > >prostitution, a bar tender, a thief, etc., then you can remain where > >you were ... just now do it for Him. > > Note the subtle slam against bartenders... It's not bartenders as much as it is the people they would be catering to in their job, being the "hand" that perpetuated their addiction, their behavior toward excess. Once a person is born again, for example, it would be impossible to continue to contribute to someone engaged in that type of sin, but rather it would be theirs to witness to that person, leading them to Jesus Christ, to healing, to salvation, and not to another drink. And there are legitimate professions which would also be difficult to persist in. I have a welding background, for example. I grew up in a town where my father owned a welding shop. I was involved with welding up until my late 20s on a regular basis. A certified professional welder for years even, but I doubt I could be that type of welder any longer because the people I worked with were vulgar, obscene, using nonstop profanity, making derogatory jokes that even back in the day I often found to be over the top, but not all of them. I actually found a video I had made back in the late 90s the other day. I popped it in my VHS-C to VHC tape converter, and played it on our TV, remembering it fondly because it was part of a project a co-worker of mine was working on in the welding shop after hours. He had bought a 1970 fastback Mustang and was restoring it, and I had gone around getting video, talking to people, etc. On the radio was a local alternative station. The music that station played was full of worldliness and worldly lyrics which I was shocked to hear in that way as I used to like that music. Profanity was there, rude jokes, all kinds of stuff. I couldn't even watch it with the sound on. I had to turn the sound off and just look around at the welding shop and remember it that way. That experience really brought into my mind how much the Lord has changed me. I still wrestle with things everyday, and am told by a great many Christians who have been holy-seeking Christians for decades that it will be that way until He calls us Home. Still, it was quite a shock to see myself in that video, using profanity, participating in rude humor and what not, because it's so much not a thing in my life today. In 2012 when my mother had died, I had 40 days before I was hired on at my new job after her death. I went to work with my father for a couple weeks at the place he works now. He sold his welding shop back in 2002 I believe, and has worked for one of his major customers when he had the shop since that time. When I went there I worked mostly with welding and really enjoyed it. But, there were about eight other employees there apart from my father, and they used profanity and were crass and what not. It was quite a thing to see then also in that light being as I haven't really been around those folks I used to be around all the time like that on a day-in/day-out basis for years. The general atmosphere of the work environment was like that from the VHC-C video I had found. Holiness is an active pursuit in a Christian's life. It draws us nearer to God (as He is Holy, Holy, Holy). It has us in pursuit of His Holy Spirit instead of our flesh, which is the walk we're supposed to be on. And the process of shedding our natural tendencies toward those former behaviors in our lives is called sanctification. It is a long and slow process as conviction is poured out, but it is one that is ever ongoing, and ever increasing. In any event, it was very eye-opening to see myself in what would've been my completely familiar old style of behavior and mannerisms. It was really something to see how much the Lord has changed me, even though when I self-examine myself I consistently come up short with what I desire to do in my heart, also something those holy-seeking Christians I mentioned said would happen until the day I'm called Home. ----- A Christian's life is changed from the inside-out by God. It is a total rewiring from top to bottom, back to front, side to side. The old passes away, and the new is here. The born again Christian is never the same again. This is my testimony, and this is my experience. And there are many more such testimonies I've seen, and come across regularly. Jesus Christ really is that powerful in a person's life. He changes everything. Best regards, Rick C. Hodgin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 16:01 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <bda23206-8ba0-40e2-bbb2-a55901184e73@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #75310 |
On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 11:20:36 PM UTC, Kenny McCormack wrote: > In article <MPG.30a80df07f6f0fe38d@news.eternal-september.org>, > Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> wrote: > ... > >Many, probably most, of the people who designed and built > >the microprocessor you are using are not Christian. It was > >probably designed in Israel. > > Is that really true? Do you have a reference for it? > (Not that I am doubting you; I am genuinely curious) > Israel has a flourishing semi-conductor design industry, and Intel has an office there. However whilst I don't know the exact proportion of work, I doubt that Intel has put itself in the position where it relies on the Israeli office to be able to design processors at all. Most of the Israeli employees will of course be non-Christians. But that's also likely to be true of the American employees, depending how you define it. Britain also has a large micro-processor design industry, based in Cambridge.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 16:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e0adcb4a-eff6-4a96-9e30-70d5c9517ccb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #75312 |
On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 7:01:43 PM UTC-5, Malcolm McLean wrote: > On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 11:20:36 PM UTC, Kenny McCormack wrote: > > In article <MPG.30a80df07f6f0fe38d@news.eternal-september.org>, > > Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> wrote: > > ... > > >Many, probably most, of the people who designed and built > > >the microprocessor you are using are not Christian. It was > > >probably designed in Israel. > > > > Is that really true? Do you have a reference for it? > > (Not that I am doubting you; I am genuinely curious) > > > Israel has a flourishing semi-conductor design industry, > and Intel has an office there. However whilst I don't know > the exact proportion of work, I doubt that Intel has put > itself in the position where it relies on the Israeli office > to be able to design processors at all. > > Most of the Israeli employees will of course be non-Christians. > But that's also likely to be true of the American employees, > depending how you define it. > > Britain also has a large micro-processor design industry, based > in Cambridge. Just to be clear, I am not shunning non-Christians. They are part of continuous outreach. I walk out into the world and encounter all manner of non-Christian behavior. However, in my life, and in the things I do, I lift them to the Lord, and I encourage and teach those around me to do the same, for those ends are profitable, and desirable, in our walk here upon this Earth. Best regards, Rick C. Hodgin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 16:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30a83253f956e46190@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #75310 |
Kenny McCormack wrote: > Philip Lantz wrote: > >Many, probably most, of the people who designed and built the > >microprocessor you are using are not Christian. It was probably > >designed in Israel. > > Is that really true? Do you have a reference for it? > (Not that I am doubting you; I am genuinely curious) Just based on market share, he is "probably" using an Intel microprocessor, though of course I don't know that. As I understand it, about half of Intel processors were designed in Israel until a few years ago, and all of them are now, so slightly better than 50-50 that a current system with an Intel processor contains a processor designed in Israel. For instance, Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge, and Skylake were all designed in Israel. I think Haswell was designed in Oregon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Bridge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivy_Bridge_(microarchitecture) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skylake_(microarchitecture) > But, anyway, it don't bother him none; he intends to start with sand and > build it all from there. Yeah, I hadn't read that part until after my response. Disclaimer: I work for Intel, but none of the above has anything to do with my work and is not in any way a statement of Intel's knowledge or position on anything.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-08 09:59 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <n1ma6f$lk4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #75294 |
Philip Lantz wrote: > Ian Collins wrote: >> >> Rick C. Hodgin wrote: >> > Malcolm McLean wrote: >> >> Rick C. Hodgin wrote: >> >>> Malcolm McLean wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> llc-win also has the merit of being actually implemented. It's a >> >>>> released compiler that you can use for serious development. >> >>> >> >>> Excellent. Thank you, Malcom. I appreciate the assistance. >> >>> >> >> It's got garbage collection. >> >> So you can have garbage collection in C Alive for free, if you use >> >> llc-win. That might help you get something up and running. >> > >> > My goals are to create an offering for the Lord, one which is founded >> > upon Him and the skills and talents He first gave me, as an offering >> > given back to Him, and then also to mankind. >> > >> > To my knowledge, Jacob Navia is not a Christian. As such, I could >> > not use any of his work to build the product I'm in pursuit of because >> > the thing I'm building is not just a tool. >> >> Was the bloke who invented the wheel a Christian? > > Many, probably most, of the people who designed and built the > microprocessor you are using are not Christian. It was probably designed > in Israel. Probably designed in Israel, manufactured in Taiwan and packaged in Thailand. -- Reinhardt
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-06 10:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <87twozxuym.fsf@bsb.me.uk> |
| In reply to | #75045 |
Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> writes: > On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 12:14:01 AM UTC, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: >> On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 6:43:51 PM UTC-5, Malcolm McLean wrote: >> >> > llc-win also has the merit of being actually implemented. It's a >> > released compiler that you can use for serious development. >> >> Excellent. Thank you, Malcom. I appreciate the assistance. >> > It's got garbage collection. > So you can have garbage collection in C Alive for free, if you use > llc-win. Jacob uses the Boehm garbage collector. I works with lots of compilers and on lots of systems. http://www.hboehm.info/gc -- Ben.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-06 10:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n1i0t5$5tj$1@news.xmission.com> |
| In reply to | #75061 |
In article <87twozxuym.fsf@bsb.me.uk>, Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> wrote: >Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> writes: > >> On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 12:14:01 AM UTC, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: >>> On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 6:43:51 PM UTC-5, Malcolm McLean wrote: >>> >>> > llc-win also has the merit of being actually implemented. It's a >>> > released compiler that you can use for serious development. >>> >>> Excellent. Thank you, Malcom. I appreciate the assistance. >>> >> It's got garbage collection. >> So you can have garbage collection in C Alive for free, if you use >> llc-win. > >Jacob uses the Boehm garbage collector. I works with lots of compilers >and on lots of systems. That hardly matters, given that Jacob is not a Christian. Do we know at this point whether or not Hans Boehm is a Christian? -- > No, I haven't, that's why I'm asking questions. If you won't help me, > why don't you just go find your lost manhood elsewhere. CLC in a nutshell.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c
csiph-web