Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #67760 > unrolled thread

signal for sse

Started byfir <profesor.fir@gmail.com>
First post2015-08-18 13:13 -0700
Last post2015-08-20 13:57 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 63 — 9 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c


Contents

  signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:13 -0700
    Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 14:12 -0700
      Re: signal for sse Johann Klammer <klammerj@NOSPAM.a1.net> - 2015-08-19 11:11 +0200
        Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 05:20 -0700
          Re: signal for sse "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 06:39 -0700
            Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 06:50 -0700
              Re: signal for sse "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 06:56 -0700
                Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:02 -0700
                  Re: signal for sse "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:06 -0700
                    Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:23 -0700
                      Re: signal for sse "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:31 -0700
                        Re: signal for sse "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:41 -0700
                          Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:50 -0700
                            Re: signal for sse "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:55 -0700
                              Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 08:40 -0700
                                Re: signal for sse "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 08:54 -0700
                                  Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 09:32 -0700
                                    Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 09:51 -0700
                                      Re: signal for sse "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 10:54 -0700
                                        Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 10:58 -0700
                                          Re: signal for sse "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 11:00 -0700
                                            Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 11:08 -0700
                                          Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 11:05 -0700
                                            Re: signal for sse "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 11:11 -0700
                                              Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 12:57 -0700
                                                Re: signal for sse "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 13:03 -0700
                                                  Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 13:13 -0700
                                                    Re: signal for sse "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 13:22 -0700
                                                      Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 13:32 -0700
                                                        Re: signal for sse "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 13:53 -0700
                                                          Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 14:09 -0700
                                                            Re: signal for sse "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 14:18 -0700
                                                              Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 14:43 -0700
                                                                Re: signal for sse "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 15:00 -0700
                                                                  Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 15:12 -0700
                                                                    Re: signal for sse "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 15:33 -0700
                                      Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 00:39 -0700
                                        Re: signal for sse Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 01:00 -0700
                                          Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 01:15 -0700
                                            Re: signal for sse Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:03 -0700
                                              Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 00:32 -0700
                                                Re: signal for sse Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 00:14 -0700
                                                  Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 00:48 -0700
                                                    Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 01:10 -0700
                                                    Re: signal for sse Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:38 -0700
                                                      Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:53 -0700
                                                      Re: signal for sse Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-08-22 18:57 -0700
                                                        Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:01 -0700
                                                          Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:14 -0700
                                                        Re: signal for sse Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:10 -0700
                                                          Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:34 -0700
                                                          Re: signal for sse Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-08-22 22:38 -0700
                                                            Re: signal for sse Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 22:16 -0700
                                                          Re: signal for sse gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-08-23 11:47 +0000
                                        Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 15:35 -0700
                                          Re: signal for sse fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 11:50 -0700
                Re: signal for sse "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:04 -0700
                Re: signal for sse "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-08-19 21:08 -0700
                  Re: signal for sse "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 03:24 -0700
                    Re: signal for sse jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-08-20 15:52 +0200
                      Re: signal for sse "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 07:29 -0700
                        Re: signal for sse Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-22 08:25 +0200
                    Re: signal for sse "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-08-20 13:57 -0700

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →


#67924

Fromfir <profesor.fir@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-21 00:32 -0700
Message-ID<ab3a0916-740b-4d32-8b94-b52a590d6301@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#67920
W dniu piątek, 21 sierpnia 2015 05:04:10 UTC+2 użytkownik Chad napisał:
> fir, your grammar and spelling is as dismal as your programming. Seriously.  And I would be really shocked if you worked as an actual computer programmer for any major firm on this planet.

first you should apologize 'dear' bl;abblin simpleton idiot insulter, next who cares by what given usenet idiot inculter simpleton 
would be shocked or not shocked, (i would be bored only), finally stop blabla and get off 
to your own colegues 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#67989

FromChad <cdalten@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-22 00:14 -0700
Message-ID<1a243413-c1ee-40fb-8d63-dd8bd12adbe4@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#67924
fir, with all due respect, take a break from comp.lang.c and learn the English language. After that, ask yourself why you suck as a programmer. I'm pretty sure you will reach the conclusion that programming isn't your calling in life.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#67993

Fromfir <profesor.fir@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-22 00:48 -0700
Message-ID<be7f6e10-5b16-4a5e-bfb5-91bdde89cb2f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#67989
W dniu sobota, 22 sierpnia 2015 09:14:34 UTC+2 użytkownik Chad napisał:
> fir, with all due respect, take a break from comp.lang.c and learn the English language. After that, ask yourself why you suck as a programmer. I'm pretty sure you will reach the conclusion that programming isn't your calling in life.

great story 'dear' idiot insulter, (though not too much, such people who show such level of inteligence advices are called "kołek" in my country)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#67994

Fromfir <profesor.fir@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-22 01:10 -0700
Message-ID<f3bb35d2-bb8f-497d-a1f3-082431841e85@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#67993
W dniu sobota, 22 sierpnia 2015 09:48:48 UTC+2 użytkownik fir napisał:

> great story 'dear' idiot insulter, (though not too much, such people who show such level of inteligence advices are called "kołek" in my country)

cannot find exact translation but maybe something close to  knucklehead or thicko

why? becouse your 'wisdom' is clearly short primitive (not any kind of merithorically deepened one) and also your approch of 'sharing' that is primitive and simpletonic,
this is makin you primitive knucklehead 

also other kinds of proofs that you are primitive are shown, very simpletonic /knucklehead insult at the beginning.. then
'with all due respect', if you are insulting me with simpletonic jokes of monkeyish 12-yo 
(showing that you imagine your audience is such primitive as you)
then use 'with all due respect' this is absurd mixing quite characteristical for stupid 
ones - so sorry for you, but you know,
It is very weak chance (if any) that you are not knuckelhead/thicko (really it is zero chance as not thicko would avoid such things youre not ashemed to write) then there is a problem that your message is just stupid (looks like part of a bleiving program of knuckelhead, sorry to say dear insulting idiot) - if you want to pose on some mentaor who can give advices poor chad you should
try to craft something really opening and 
merotherically intelligent - not playing a mentor fool

(besides i was asking you to go to you colegues i dont like to talk with knuckleheads, you got IC, KT, and others they should suit your intelectual level here)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68065

FromChad <cdalten@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-22 16:38 -0700
Message-ID<ac2a73b6-4fe5-4780-a6d9-48393e197ddf@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#67993
fir, unlike you, I have what it takes to work as a programmer for living. Again, I think you need to take a break from comp.lang.c and learn the the English language, because quite frankly, your grammar and your spelling is as dismal as your programming. 

And just for the record, based on the coding I see, I would never consider hiring you in any kind of programming capacity. And I would be quite shocked if anyone on this forum who works as a programmer would consider hiring you in any type of programming capacity. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68067

Fromfir <profesor.fir@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-22 16:53 -0700
Message-ID<16bbc48d-9ff6-4a28-a9ed-bab306553730@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#68065
W dniu niedziela, 23 sierpnia 2015 01:38:34 UTC+2 użytkownik Chad napisał:
> fir, unlike you, I have what it takes to work as a programmer for living. Again, I think you need to take a break from comp.lang.c and learn the the English language, because quite frankly, your grammar and your spelling is as dismal as your programming. 
> 
> And just for the record, based on the coding I see, I would never consider hiring you in any kind of programming capacity. And I would be quite shocked if anyone on this forum who works as a programmer would consider hiring you in any type of programming capacity.

dear idiot insulter, you have quite patological
'feature' of your own -feature of not understanding what im saying - thus you are plaing a dumb dummy sorry to say

you should also note dear dumb idiot, though it seems it exceeds your mental abilities, that i am not in position of being hired by you and anybody (what the fuck, do you have some mental illnes or what - do you consider a usenet as a some place for candidates for hearing in companiess full of sorrow (and dumbs like you), your dumbnes and stupidity realy astounds me).. 

If you wand blabla your dumb dreams who you will hired and who no and also to shrive
of your inner shocks you should consider
going to a church, psychologist or any other
'professional' to whom you could pay for listening your blabla - maybe they will 
provide some help to you

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68072

FromKeith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Date2015-08-22 18:57 -0700
Message-ID<ln37za22dt.fsf@kst-u.example.com>
In reply to#68065
Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> writes:
> fir, unlike you, I have what it takes to work as a programmer for
> living. Again, I think you need to take a break from comp.lang.c and
> learn the the English language, because quite frankly, your grammar
> and your spelling is as dismal as your programming.
>
> And just for the record, based on the coding I see, I would never
> consider hiring you in any kind of programming capacity. And I would
> be quite shocked if anyone on this forum who works as a programmer
> would consider hiring you in any type of programming capacity.

Chad, you've seen how fir reacts to people who *don't* insult him.

You're not helping.


-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68073

Fromfir <profesor.fir@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-22 18:01 -0700
Message-ID<adb978dd-0ceb-448c-9891-7909686f0f99@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#68072
W dniu niedziela, 23 sierpnia 2015 02:39:54 UTC+2 użytkownik Keith Thompson napisał:
> Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> writes:
> > fir, unlike you, I have what it takes to work as a programmer for
> > living. Again, I think you need to take a break from comp.lang.c and
> > learn the the English language, because quite frankly, your grammar
> > and your spelling is as dismal as your programming.
> >
> > And just for the record, based on the coding I see, I would never
> > consider hiring you in any kind of programming capacity. And I would
> > be quite shocked if anyone on this forum who works as a programmer
> > would consider hiring you in any type of programming capacity.
> 
> Chad, you've seen how fir reacts to people who *don't* insult him.
> 
> You're not helping.
> 
well you also not, 

if shit escalates, silence in appropriate moment is priceless

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68077

Fromfir <profesor.fir@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-22 18:14 -0700
Message-ID<87746277-e914-4042-beb7-565a50cecd87@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#68073
W dniu niedziela, 23 sierpnia 2015 03:02:04 UTC+2 użytkownik fir napisał:
> W dniu niedziela, 23 sierpnia 2015 02:39:54 UTC+2 użytkownik Keith Thompson napisał:
> > Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> writes:
> > > fir, unlike you, I have what it takes to work as a programmer for
> > > living. Again, I think you need to take a break from comp.lang.c and
> > > learn the the English language, because quite frankly, your grammar
> > > and your spelling is as dismal as your programming.
> > >
> > > And just for the record, based on the coding I see, I would never
> > > consider hiring you in any kind of programming capacity. And I would
> > > be quite shocked if anyone on this forum who works as a programmer
> > > would consider hiring you in any type of programming capacity.
> > 
> > Chad, you've seen how fir reacts to people who *don't* insult him.
> > 
> > You're not helping.
> > 
> well you also not, 
> 
> if shit escalates, silence in appropriate moment is priceless

ps i should take note to reconsider a topic of "silence closers and good and bad punchlines in internet shitstorms" (but this is not for lamers - good topic for graduate thessis dissertation)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68076

FromChad <cdalten@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-22 18:10 -0700
Message-ID<6d42fe13-46d9-4e2d-a13d-412d8253d23f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#68072
Keith,

Sorry, but fir is denser than both Arnuld and Bill combined. I guess I am getting fed up with guy. I guess what really annoys me that it makes no effet to improve either the grammar or the programming. With that, I think I might add this no talent wannabe programmer to make kill file. Have fun trying to cipher through its broken and semi incoherent English.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68080

Fromfir <profesor.fir@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-22 18:34 -0700
Message-ID<c07c4a86-59c6-4dba-bff7-f14d493addd8@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#68076
W dniu niedziela, 23 sierpnia 2015 03:10:35 UTC+2 użytkownik Chad napisał:
>  I guess what really annoys me that it makes no effet to improve either the grammar or the programming.

What annoys me is that you lamers couldnt even stop the shitstorm in right moment, you must say something stupid to badly punchline it on your mentally lame own..

Now we have a dillemate if maybe continue this shitstream to punchline it somewhat better (which would be some gain maybe) or to stop it 
as it is (which would be some gain too - not reading shit blablers anymore)

 I could eventually work on some terrific punchline, but good one is not so easy thing

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68088

FromKeith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Date2015-08-22 22:38 -0700
Message-ID<lny4h2zhru.fsf@kst-u.example.com>
In reply to#68076
Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> writes:
> Keith,
>
> I think I might add this no talent wannabe programmer to make kill
> file.

Thank you, seriously.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68090

FromChad <cdalten@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-22 22:16 -0700
Message-ID<7c524a96-60a3-4a0b-a551-527b6aadab32@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#68088
And I apparently pulled a fir by having typos in my posts. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68103

Fromgazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Date2015-08-23 11:47 +0000
Message-ID<mrcbsb$v11$1@news.xmission.com>
In reply to#68076
In article <6d42fe13-46d9-4e2d-a13d-412d8253d23f@googlegroups.com>,
Chad  <cdalten@gmail.com> wrote:
>Keith,
>
>Sorry, but fir is denser than both Arnuld and Bill combined. I guess I am
>getting fed up with guy. I guess what really annoys me that it makes no
>effet to improve either the grammar or the programming. With that, I think
>I might add this no talent wannabe programmer to make kill file. Have fun
>trying to cipher through its broken and semi incoherent English.

Keith don't like it when people other than him try to police dis
newsgroup.

Dis be his territory.  Be leaving it 'lone, so he can do da bizness!

-- 
About that whole "sent His Son to die for us thing", I've never been able 
to understand that one.  It's not like Jesus isn't going back to Heaven 
after his Earthly self dies, right?  So, having him be executed, and 
resurrect a few days later strikes me as being more akin to spending the 
weekend at the non-custodial parent's house than "dying", doesn't it?  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#67913

Fromfir <profesor.fir@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-20 15:35 -0700
Message-ID<50b3fc7e-c86e-4d7f-a737-f287c5ea2eab@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#67871
W dniu czwartek, 20 sierpnia 2015 09:39:11 UTC+2 użytkownik fir napisał:
> I may add that me veh handler gives such info
> 
> exception code: c000 02b5
> (STATUS_FLOAT_MULTIPLE_TRAPS)
> flags: 0
> adress: 0040 d477
> 
> the code from debbugger is below,
> 
> i dont quite understand why it is reported on sub not on mov, it seems like it should be on
> read from ramm, isent stack aligned here
> though? so isnt this adress aligned?
> 
> 
> 0040D450   $ 55             PUSH EBP
> 0040D451   . 89E5           MOV EBP,ESP
> 0040D453   . 83E4 F0        AND ESP,FFFFFFF0
> 0040D456   . 83EC 10        SUB ESP,10
> 0040D459   . 8B4D 08        MOV ECX,DWORD PTR SS:[EBP+8]
> 0040D45C   . 0F290424       MOVAPS DQWORD PTR SS:[ESP],XMM0
> 0040D460   . 85C9           TEST ECX,ECX
> 0040D462   . 78 5B          JS SHORT program.0040D4BF
> 0040D464   . 0F57C0         XORPS XMM0,XMM0
> 0040D467   . 31C0           XOR EAX,EAX
> 0040D469   . 0F28D0         MOVAPS XMM2,XMM0
> 0040D46C   . 0F28E0         MOVAPS XMM4,XMM0
> 0040D46F   . EB 1A          JMP SHORT program.0040D48B
> 0040D471   > 0F59D4         MULPS XMM2,XMM4
> 0040D474   . 83C0 01        ADD EAX,1
> 0040D477   . 0F5CF5         SUBPS XMM6,XMM5
> 0040D47A   . 0F282424       MOVAPS XMM4,DQWORD PTR SS:[ESP]
> 0040D47E   . 39C1           CMP ECX,EAX
> 0040D480   . 0F58E6         ADDPS XMM4,XMM6
> 0040D483   . 0F58D2         ADDPS XMM2,XMM2
> 0040D486   . 0F58D1         ADDPS XMM2,XMM1
> 0040D489   . 7C 2E          JL SHORT program.0040D4B9
> 0040D48B   > 0F28F4         MOVAPS XMM6,XMM4
> 0040D48E   . 0F28EA         MOVAPS XMM5,XMM2
> 0040D491   . 0F283D 9008440>MOVAPS XMM7,DQWORD PTR DS:[440890]
> 0040D498   . 0F59F4         MULPS XMM6,XMM4
> 0040D49B   . 0F59EA         MULPS XMM5,XMM2
> 0040D49E   . 0F28DE         MOVAPS XMM3,XMM6
> 0040D4A1   . 0F58DD         ADDPS XMM3,XMM5
> 0040D4A4   . 0FC21D 8008440>CMPLTPS XMM3,DQWORD PTR DS:[440880]
> 0040D4AC   . 0F54FB         ANDPS XMM7,XMM3
> 0040D4AF   . 0F50D3         MOVMSKPS EDX,XMM3
> 0040D4B2   . 85D2           TEST EDX,EDX
> 0040D4B4   . 0F58C7         ADDPS XMM0,XMM7
> 0040D4B7   .^75 B8          JNZ SHORT program.0040D471
> 0040D4B9   > 66:0F5B        ???                                      ;  Unknown command
> 0040D4BC     C0             DB C0
> 0040D4BD   . C9             LEAVE
> 0040D4BE   . C3             RETN
> 0040D4BF   > 0F57C0         XORPS XMM0,XMM0
> 0040D4C2   .^EB F5          JMP SHORT program.0040D4B9
> 0040D4C4     8DB6 00000000  LEA ESI,DWORD PTR DS:[ESI]
> 0040D4CA     8DBF 00000000  LEA EDI,DWORD PTR DS:[EDI]

how i see it

0040D450   $ 55             PUSH EBP
0040D451   . 89E5           MOV EBP,ESP

now if im not wrong esp points to pushed ebp value
(ebp has an adress of previous ebp of the caller)
(esp+4) is return adress,

0040D453   . 83E4 F0        AND ESP,FFFFFFF0

now esp could be rounded down to 16, though it wouldnt mean
that there is free place under it (it could be 0 bytes free, 1 byte
free, up to 15 byutes free (probably)

0040D456   . 83EC 10        SUB ESP,10

now there is full 16 Bytes free

0040D459   . 8B4D 08        MOV ECX,DWORD PTR SS:[EBP+8]

that was a mistery why max_iter is first arg if this is cdecl
 but this is probably becouse cre and cim are passed in xmm0 and xmm1

0040D45C   . 0F290424       MOVAPS DQWORD PTR SS:[ESP],XMM0

store cre as local1 becouse a lack of registers

0040D460   . 85C9           TEST ECX,ECX
0040D462   . 78 5B          JS SHORT program.0040D4BF

avoid the for loop if maxiter<0

0040D464   . 0F57C0         XORPS XMM0,XMM0
0040D467   . 31C0           XOR EAX,EAX
0040D469   . 0F28D0         MOVAPS XMM2,XMM0
0040D46C   . 0F28E0         MOVAPS XMM4,XMM0

xmm2 would be re, xmm4 would be im

0040D46F   . EB 1A          JMP SHORT program.0040D48B

0040D471   > 0F59D4         MULPS XMM2,XMM4
xmm2 would be reim

0040D474   . 83C0 01        ADD EAX,1
eax would be probably n counter

0040D477   . 0F5CF5         SUBPS XMM6,XMM5
xmm6 would be rere-imim

0040D47A   . 0F282424       MOVAPS XMM4,DQWORD PTR SS:[ESP]
xmm4 would be stored cre?

0040D47E   . 39C1           CMP ECX,EAX

0040D480   . 0F58E6         ADDPS XMM4,XMM6
xmm4 is cre+rere-imim
0040D483   . 0F58D2         ADDPS XMM2,XMM2
0040D486   . 0F58D1         ADDPS XMM2,XMM1
xmm2 is reim+reim + cim
0040D489   . 7C 2E          JL SHORT program.0040D4B9

0040D48B   > 0F28F4         MOVAPS XMM6,XMM4
0040D48E   . 0F28EA         MOVAPS XMM5,XMM2
xmm6 would be old re, xmm5 would be old im
0040D491   . 0F283D 9008440>MOVAPS XMM7,DQWORD PTR DS:[440890]
0040D498   . 0F59F4         MULPS XMM6,XMM4
0040D49B   . 0F59EA         MULPS XMM5,XMM2

xmm6 would be rere, xmm5 would be imim
xmm7 would be 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

0040D49E   . 0F28DE         MOVAPS XMM3,XMM6
0040D4A1   . 0F58DD         ADDPS XMM3,XMM5
xmm3 would be rere+imim
0040D4A4   . 0FC21D 8008440>CMPLTPS XMM3,DQWORD PTR DS:[440880]

compare with 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

0040D4AC   . 0F54FB         ANDPS XMM7,XMM3
0040D4AF   . 0F50D3         MOVMSKPS EDX,XMM3
0040D4B2   . 85D2           TEST EDX,EDX
0040D4B4   . 0F58C7         ADDPS XMM0,XMM7

xmm0 would be probably iteration counter

0040D4B7   .^75 B8          JNZ SHORT program.0040D471

0040D4B9   > 66:0F5B        ???                                      ;  Unknown command
0040D4BC     C0             DB C0
0040D4BD   . C9             LEAVE
0040D4BE   . C3             RETN

here it is badly disasembled but it is   cvtps2dq    %xmm0, %xmm0
conversion, seem like ret is also thru xmm0

0040D4BF   > 0F57C0         XORPS XMM0,XMM0
0040D4C2   .^EB F5          JMP SHORT program.0040D4B9
0040D4C4     8DB6 00000000  LEA ESI,DWORD PTR DS:[ESI]
0040D4CA     8DBF 00000000  LEA EDI,DWORD PTR DS:[EDI]

all in al i see no reason for exception those stored cre at (esp)
is 16-aligned but wait.. no.. those constants at DS:[440880] and
DS:[440890] are also fine aligned.. so what the hell

in general those three m128 reads and one m128 stores are not
needed but it is becouse a lack of registers, even by hand assembly
(where i am not to much crafted i wouldnt able optimise it
probably)

still mystery is what rises the exception, handler seem to show that it is this sub
but i dont undersad how

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#67959

Fromfir <profesor.fir@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-21 11:50 -0700
Message-ID<9092c8d4-905c-4e4a-8dc7-e7683f3fbb3c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#67913
ps i flushed some info at the pixel 
that crashes

this are the radius2 for  succesive iterations

 n: 0  
 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 
 n: 1  
 1.217690 1.220894 1.224373 1.228127 
 n: 2  
 2.381765 2.363330 2.345628 2.328645 
 n: 3  
 1.949921 1.941139 1.937195 1.937995 
 n: 4  
 0.809692 0.726044 0.690541 0.702521 
 n: 5  
 3.169605 2.350456 1.597317 0.940832 
 n: 6  
 6.467035 2.270753 0.376457 0.032555 
 n: 7  
 54.952930 11.354241 2.193198 1.174860 
 n: 8  
 3114.791504 131.215622 5.066236 2.116877 
 n: 9  
 9695089.000000 17175.589844 21.876995 1.408007 
 n: 10  
 93994772070400.000000 294995104.000000 462.726776 0.132812 
 n: 11  
 8835015832923973000000000000.000000 87022110500716544.000000 213639.140625 0.951579
 n: 12
 1.#INF00 7572848126440378200000000000000000.000000 45641338880.000000 1.797865

then sub crashes, i dont know at the moment if 
i should repair something or just maybe set up 
operations for such work that infs wouldnt rise exceptions? or just off the exceptions?

the 2nd case seem probably most proper



 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#67809

From"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-19 07:04 -0700
Message-ID<9104290f-9520-431d-bf0a-98d379de5d1c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#67807
On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 9:56:25 AM UTC-4, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> I think you'll find the edit-and-continue compiler + debugger combo
> will evolve into the best tool you have for helping you write code.
> That has been my experience, with everything else being a distant
> second.

The next best feature (which I can't remember if it's available in the
Visual Studio Expression versions) is the Code Definition window.  As
you are going through the editor it is finding the definition location
of your variable, your structure, and if in C++, your class, and so on.

There is also an add-on tool I recommend for Visual Studio made by a
company called Whole Tomato Software.  It is "Visual Assist X" and is
worth its weight in gold.  It allows so many handy refactoring features
that using Visual Studio without it is a bit of a chore, but when VAX
is available ... it makes it smooth.

Some of the best features in VAX:

     Alt+Shift+F -- Find symbol under cursor project-wide
     Alt+G       -- Goto symbol (displays list for prototype, or
                    implementation if it's a function/member)
     Alt+Shift+R -- Rename symbol (does so by context, not just
                    text replace).

It also provides continuous popups as your typing to allow you
to see the definition in context.  As you pause on a symbol, it
highlights all of the symbols of the same name on the screen,
etc.  Many of those can be disabled if you find them annoying. :-)

This is just about the only Microsoft tool I recommend, by the way.
I even advise getting yourself a Linux box and running Windows XP
under Oracle's VirtualBox for your Windows environment.

Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#67866

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam>
Date2015-08-19 21:08 -0700
Message-ID<mr3jtb$b3a$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#67807
"Rick C. Hodgin"  wrote in message 
news:c5f19e7c-364d-4bfc-8d1c-8e42da74f569@googlegroups.com...
[...]

> You can download it here for 2008 Express (938 MB), and 2010 Express
> (730 MB):

> 
> http://www.libsf.org/software/other/microsoft/visual-studio-2008-express-enu-x1397868.iso
  >    http://www.libsf.org/software/other/microsoft/vs2010_express_sp1.iso

Those are old versions Rick. I would advise the op to go here:

https://www.visualstudio.com/en-us/products/visual-studio-community-vs.aspx

Notice the green button in the upper right hand part of the screen that goes 
here:

https://www.visualstudio.com/products/free-developer-offers-vs.aspx

Registration is a bit of a hassle, but it sure does work.

;^) 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#67878

From"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-20 03:24 -0700
Message-ID<8d4023b6-6a4c-4dee-be66-ea7a2f39329f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#67866
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> Those are old versions...

I had specifically advised only using Visual Studio
2003 thru 2010, stating that I use VS 2008 for most
everything, because they are modern, and the last
non-spyware versions (linked to you through an
account, and an online presence, reporting to Redmond
your work schedule, projects, and abilities).

Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#67881

Fromjacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr>
Date2015-08-20 15:52 +0200
Message-ID<mr4lvb$leu$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#67878
Le 20/08/2015 12:24, Rick C. Hodgin a écrit :
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> Those are old versions...
>
> I had specifically advised only using Visual Studio
> 2003 thru 2010, stating that I use VS 2008 for most
> everything, because they are modern, and the last
> non-spyware versions (linked to you through an
> account, and an online presence, reporting to Redmond
> your work schedule, projects, and abilities).
>
> Best regards,
> Rick C. Hodgin
>

I have installed windows 10. It runs very well if you have a macintosh.
The windows computer has no internet access, using the router and adding 
it to the banned addresses.

All my iternet passes through the mac, and when I develop for windows I 
use it without any internet interruption, etc.

You can use the latest spyware, you are in this fashion SURE nothing 
will ever leave the windows machine.

jacob

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c


csiph-web