Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #106122 > unrolled thread
| Started by | mertesthomas@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-15 00:29 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-03-15 16:32 +0000 |
| Articles | 7 on this page of 127 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c
More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-15 00:29 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-15 11:27 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-03-15 13:18 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-15 15:22 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-15 08:26 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-15 08:25 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-15 16:46 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-15 17:07 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-15 09:52 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-03-15 16:57 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-15 10:11 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-03-15 18:17 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-03-15 17:21 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 18:42 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-03-15 18:20 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-03-15 18:59 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-03-15 18:20 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 19:39 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-15 12:44 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-03-15 20:19 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-16 10:03 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-03-16 11:15 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-03-16 11:32 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-16 13:41 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 08:52 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-16 09:57 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2017-03-16 13:53 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win jm.bourguet@gmail.com - 2017-03-16 07:14 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-16 08:59 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-15 12:43 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-03-15 20:39 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-15 23:56 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-03-15 16:33 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-15 17:47 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-15 10:04 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-16 00:52 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-15 18:02 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-15 18:23 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-17 13:45 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-18 00:23 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-18 00:29 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-18 00:31 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-17 17:01 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-03-20 16:41 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-20 18:32 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-03-20 18:18 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win bart4858@gmail.com - 2017-03-20 12:31 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-20 21:05 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-03-20 20:45 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-03-20 20:18 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-21 09:56 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2017-03-21 21:08 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-21 22:19 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2017-03-22 06:29 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-03-21 16:12 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win gordonb.s97bd@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2017-03-24 01:13 -0500
Re: More problems with lcc-win supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-03-24 08:16 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-26 03:18 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-03-26 12:35 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-29 05:17 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-03-26 14:04 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-29 05:48 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-03-21 23:21 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2017-03-22 06:18 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win gordonb.1neik@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2017-03-21 18:45 -0500
Re: More problems with lcc-win jm.bourguet@gmail.com - 2017-03-22 01:02 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-22 10:35 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-03-22 13:21 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-03-22 14:08 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-03-22 15:37 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 21:09 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-03-21 13:09 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2017-03-21 21:15 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-18 12:44 +1300
Re: More problems with lcc-win jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2017-03-17 16:59 -0700
Re: charsets Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-18 18:30 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-16 10:18 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-15 15:06 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-03-15 22:23 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-15 15:43 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-15 23:53 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-16 08:35 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-03-15 23:13 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-16 06:28 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-03-16 16:56 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-16 14:53 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-15 16:18 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-03-16 18:03 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-16 19:29 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-03-16 21:38 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-17 08:58 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-17 09:45 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-17 10:33 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2017-03-17 14:20 -0400
Re: More problems with lcc-win GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 20:18 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-18 00:44 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-03-18 13:31 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-18 15:54 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-03-20 13:27 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 15:15 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-18 11:39 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 20:11 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-03-18 19:45 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-20 00:35 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-18 14:22 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 22:46 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-18 16:12 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-03-18 18:01 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 03:21 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-19 15:32 +1300
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-19 02:17 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-15 14:25 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-15 23:49 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-15 11:28 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-15 14:35 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-15 23:44 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-15 13:06 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-15 14:43 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-15 23:43 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-15 13:19 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win mertesthomas@gmail.com - 2017-03-15 14:50 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-15 08:24 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2017-03-15 16:47 +0100
Re: More problems with lcc-win jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2017-03-15 09:04 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-15 09:15 -0700
Re: More problems with lcc-win gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2017-03-15 19:59 +0000
Re: More problems with lcc-win Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-03-15 16:32 +0000
Page 7 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]
| From | mertesthomas@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-15 14:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e9390cc5-8b2f-4efe-b884-7700947557a6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #106129 |
Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2017 13:19:27 UTC+1 schrieb jacobnavia: > Le 15/03/2017 à 08:29, mertesthomas a écrit : > > - The header stdio.h does not contain the prototype of wfopen(). > > Fixed. Will be in next release > > > - The header errno.h is missing definitions of ENOTDIR and > > ENAMETOOLONG. > > Yes, many definitions are missing from POSIX. May I remind you that the > standard just mandates 3 errors? > > EDOM > EILSEQ > ERANGE > > All other macros are not standard The header file errno.h of gcc (MinGW and Cygwin), clang, tcc, Visual C, Borland C and Pelles C defines ENOTDIR and ENAMETOOLONG. They may be not standard, but every one else defines them. > > - The header conio.h is missing. > > Obviously, we aren't in DOS anymore... > Use the console functions from Microsoft that developed a new API. > > > - In include64/sys/stat.h the definition of S_ISCHR uses _S_IFCHR > > instead of S_IFCHR. > > Fixed, will be in next release > > > - The function _pclose is missing in the 64-bit run-time library. > > Yes, since you should use CloseHandle to close a pipe. When I use popen I expect that pclose works also. > > - The function _wsystem is missing in both the 32-bit and 64-bit > > run-time library. > > That function is not mentioned in the C standard (99 edition), but I > will add it in the future. If you wish I can send you the code of the > system() function and you can modify it for wide chars. It is not very > difficult. Thank you for the offer, but I will have less time in the near future. Regards, Thomas Mertes -- Seed7 Homepage: http://seed7.sourceforge.net Seed7 - The extensible programming language: User defined statements and operators, abstract data types, templates without special syntax, OO with interfaces and multiple dispatch, statically typed, interpreted or compiled, portable, runs under linux/unix/windows.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-15 08:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <lnh92uimv7.fsf@kst-u.example.com> |
| In reply to | #106122 |
mertesthomas@gmail.com writes:
> I looked at the lcc-win32 source of fseeki64 (provided by Jacob
> Navia) and it seems ok. At least it does not look like returning an
> argument (like I can see in my tests). I looked also at the C
> run-time library of lcc-win32. The disassembled code there seems to
> correspond with the provided source code. Still I have problems
> with fseeki64 even after a fresh install of lcc-win32. Maybe it is
> an issue with the calling convention. I narrowed the problem of
> fseeki64 down and it is part of the program testlcc_4.c (see below).
> Could someone else also try testlcc_4.c with the 32-bit version of
> lcc-win32?
[snip]
If you want to discuss problems with lcc-win, as opposed to the C
language, I suggest that either comp.compilers.lcc or jacob's support
channels would be a better place than comp.lang.c.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-15 16:47 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <oabnhg$9mg$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #106134 |
Le 15/03/2017 à 16:24, Keith Thompson a écrit : > If you want to discuss problems with lcc-win, as opposed to the C > language, I suggest that either comp.compilers.lcc or jacob's support > channels would be a better place than comp.lang.c. > Go tell that to our in house preacher please. This conversation doesn't bother anyone else but you
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jameskuyper@verizon.net |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-15 09:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a7402296-87c4-40f5-9550-e91dcc21a96d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #106138 |
On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 11:47:47 AM UTC-4, jacobnavia wrote: > Le 15/03/2017 à 16:24, Keith Thompson a écrit : > > If you want to discuss problems with lcc-win, as opposed to the C > > language, I suggest that either comp.compilers.lcc or jacob's support > > channels would be a better place than comp.lang.c. > > > > Go tell that to our in house preacher please. ... He has - perhaps you didn't notice? Hodgin, being Hodgin, didn't bother paying any more attention to Keith's complaints than he did to anyone esle's. Do you really want to measure yourself against Hodgin? > ... This conversation doesn't > bother anyone else but you I didn't bother asking either of you to move the conversation, because I didn't expect either of you to cooperate, but it does still bother me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-15 09:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ln37eeikib.fsf@kst-u.example.com> |
| In reply to | #106138 |
jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> writes:
> Le 15/03/2017 à 16:24, Keith Thompson a écrit :
>> If you want to discuss problems with lcc-win, as opposed to the C
>> language, I suggest that either comp.compilers.lcc or jacob's support
>> channels would be a better place than comp.lang.c.
>
> Go tell that to our in house preacher please.
I have, multiple times. It didn't work. I no longer see anything he
posts. Thomas Mertes is not our in house preacher.
> This conversation doesn't
> bother anyone else but you
I doubt that.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-15 19:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oac6f1$ltb$1@news.xmission.com> |
| In reply to | #106141 |
In article <ln37eeikib.fsf@kst-u.example.com>, Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote: >jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> writes: >> Le 15/03/2017 à 16:24, Keith Thompson a écrit : >>> If you want to discuss problems with lcc-win, as opposed to the C >>> language, I suggest that either comp.compilers.lcc or jacob's support >>> channels would be a better place than comp.lang.c. >> >> Go tell that to our in house preacher please. > >I have, multiple times. It didn't work. I no longer see anything he >posts. Thomas Mertes is not our in house preacher. > >> This conversation doesn't >> bother anyone else but you > >I doubt that. Jacob, you need to udnerstand that, even though he has been posting to Usenet for decades, Keith doesn't understand how to use a killfile. And he refuses to learn. So, we need to do his killfiling for him. -- First of all, I do not appreciate your playing stupid here at all. - Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn -
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-15 16:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oabq5e$rr1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #106138 |
On 15/03/17 15:47, jacobnavia wrote: > Le 15/03/2017 à 16:24, Keith Thompson a écrit : >> If you want to discuss problems with lcc-win, as opposed to the C >> language, I suggest that either comp.compilers.lcc or jacob's support >> channels would be a better place than comp.lang.c. >> > > Go tell that to our in house preacher please. This conversation doesn't > bother anyone else but you It bothers me, but since you never pay any attention to polite requests to keep compiler-specific discussions in compiler-specific newsgroups, there didn't seem any point in mentioning it. Since you bring it up, though, yes, it bothers me. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c
csiph-web