Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #103545 > unrolled thread

project together?

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c

Contents

  project together? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 10:16 -0800
    Re: project together? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-09 18:28 +0000
      Re: project together? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 10:45 -0800
      Re: project together? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2017-02-09 20:04 +0000
        Re: project together? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-09 21:30 +0100
          Re: project together? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 12:43 -0800
          Re: project together? mark.bluemel@gmail.com - 2017-02-10 00:47 -0800
            Re: project together? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 00:57 -0800
              Re: project together? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 07:17 -0800
            Re: project together? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 04:24 -0800
            Re: project together? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-13 10:31 +0100
          Re: project together? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-11 19:08 +1300
            Re: project together? "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2017-02-11 10:02 -0500
              Re: project together? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-13 10:34 +0100
              Re: project together? "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2017-02-13 10:24 -0500
    Re: project together? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 10:46 -0800
      Re: project together? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 11:06 -0800
        Re: project together? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 12:06 -0800
          Re: project together? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 12:18 -0800
            Re: project together? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-09 21:57 -0800
              Re: project together? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 00:48 -0800
                Re: project together? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-10 02:52 -0800
                  Re: project together? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 06:47 -0800
                    Re: project together? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 07:12 -0800
              Re: project together? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-13 10:39 +0100
                Re: project together? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-13 02:32 -0800
                Re: project together? GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 11:58 +0100
                  Re: project together? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-13 05:39 -0800
                    Re: project together? GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 12:11 +0100
                      Re: project together? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-14 03:58 -0800
                        Re: project together? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-14 12:01 +0000
                          Re: project together? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-14 13:36 +0100
                        Making things open source requires copyright notices; it's the world we live in (Was: project together?) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2017-02-14 12:46 +0000
                        Re: project together? GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 14:24 +0100
                Re: project together? raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2017-02-15 21:07 +0000
        Re: project together? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 12:48 -0800
          Re: project together? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 13:04 -0800
    Re: project together? void <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 20:00 -0800
      Re: project together? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 01:18 -0800
        Re: project together? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 02:20 -0800
          Re: project together? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 03:31 -0800
        Re: project together? void <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 02:48 -0800
          Re: project together? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 03:16 -0800
            Re: project together? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 03:40 -0800

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#103545 — project together?

im so bored by this group.. people talk about not important topics etc.. they waste skill and time.. i think if something 
maybe should be changed to go this group more into real coding with real outcome.. 

real talk should be on real source so maybe project together?

i wonder if some people would be interested in this.. if some like 5 persons would participate there maybe something could be
done.. and all details could be talked in this group making more interesting content

i would suggest writing some simple assembler for invented virtual machine/ then also this virtual machine

(the condition in such participating in such project would be
that if anybody writes code for that he shows that and answer 
on all question about this piece of code to make others fully
understand it - if someone would like to write some piece in his own way, he may do some fork/branch but should also public 
it and answer to all answers about this code - i mean all 
branches could and should be discussed)

if that would be done (i mean virtal assembler and eventaully 
its emulator_ we could go further making real x86 asm from 
this or make some higher language compiled to this real 
or virtual assembler (in also virtual or real .exe format)

i would probably like to contribute in such project if at least 
four five participators would go with that.. i could eventually
maybe go in other kind of projects but this virtual asm /machine/language seem to be maybe more good imo

probably nobody would be interested, but maybe?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#103547

fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> writes:
<snip>
> real talk should be on real source so maybe project together?
>
> i wonder if some people would be interested in this.. if some like 5
> persons would participate there maybe something could be
> done..

Do you think any of the people you've insulted are likely to want to
work with you?  I wonder if there are 5 people here who you have not
insulted.

<snip>
-- 
Ben.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#103548

W dniu czwartek, 9 lutego 2017 19:28:29 UTC+1 użytkownik Ben Bacarisse napisał:
> fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> writes:
> <snip>
> > real talk should be on real source so maybe project together?
> >
> > i wonder if some people would be interested in this.. if some like 5
> > persons would participate there maybe something could be
> > done..
> 
> Do you think any of the people you've insulted are likely to want to
> work with you?  I wonder if there are 5 people here who you have not
> insulted.
> 

name them maybe.. coz it seems we may live in different realities so im not sure what people you talk on

(i named "hodgin", "chang" and "ramine" as abusers and idiots but this is more on the matter as they reasoning work really bad.. so my intention was to adress that important point (of going out of mind) - besides i dont remember, i call some "troll" insulters (probably you know who) as "insulters" but i dont think name insulter as an insulter is in fact insult ) so who else? [i honestly dont remember, possibly alla i called noob ]


besides no, some people like those mentioned seven wouldnt
actually be the ones who i would think can participate it
(chng and ramine would be unable to that, those 3 other (thompson, brown nd heathfield) re obviously interested in 
blabling not in working, lla is to lame )

(only hodhin eventully could, coz he likes such kind of work, and if he want he mybe could but if he would like to 
freak on bible it would be not good)

but besides there are a couple of other whose showed some code and eventually would be able to fit

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#103560

In article <871sv76wxm.fsf@bsb.me.uk>,
Ben Bacarisse  <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> wrote:
>fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> writes:
><snip>
>> real talk should be on real source so maybe project together?
>>
>> i wonder if some people would be interested in this.. if some like 5
>> persons would participate there maybe something could be
>> done..
>
>Do you think any of the people you've insulted are likely to want to
>work with you?  I wonder if there are 5 people here who you have not
>insulted.

You people are too thin-skinned.  It is typical of the regs in this newsgroup.

In some circles, it is considered a mark of acceptance when people insult
you.  Means you're in the group.  Means you can be trusted.

-- 
"Unattended children will be given an espresso and a free kitten."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#103566

On 09/02/17 21:04, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> In article <871sv76wxm.fsf@bsb.me.uk>,
> Ben Bacarisse  <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> wrote:
>> fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> writes:
>> <snip>
>>> real talk should be on real source so maybe project together?
>>>
>>> i wonder if some people would be interested in this.. if some like 5
>>> persons would participate there maybe something could be
>>> done..
>>
>> Do you think any of the people you've insulted are likely to want to
>> work with you?  I wonder if there are 5 people here who you have not
>> insulted.
>
> You people are too thin-skinned.  It is typical of the regs in this newsgroup.
>
> In some circles, it is considered a mark of acceptance when people insult
> you.  Means you're in the group.  Means you can be trusted.
>

I doubt if Ben is particularly bothered by being insulted by Fir.  And 
certainly I consider my "primitive commonist blabler" status as marking 
me in good company.

But I don't feel particularly motived to work with Fir on whatever 
project he is thinking about - his insults whenever I have helped him in 
the past make it unlikely that I would help him in the future.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#103568

W dniu czwartek, 9 lutego 2017 21:31:02 UTC+1 użytkownik David Brown napisał:
> 
> I doubt if Ben is particularly bothered by being insulted by Fir.  And 
> certainly I consider my "primitive commonist blabler" status as marking 
> me in good company.
> 

not really

> But I don't feel particularly motived to work with Fir on whatever 
> project he is thinking about - his insults whenever I have helped him in 
> the past make it unlikely that I would help him in the future.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#103594

On Thursday, 9 February 2017 20:31:02 UTC, David Brown  wrote:
> On 09/02/17 21:04, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> > In article <871sv76wxm.fsf@bsb.me.uk>,
> > Ben Bacarisse  <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> wrote:
> >> fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> writes:
> >> <snip>
> >>> real talk should be on real source so maybe project together?
> >>>
> >>> i wonder if some people would be interested in this.. if some like 5
> >>> persons would participate there maybe something could be
> >>> done..
> >>
> >> Do you think any of the people you've insulted are likely to want to
> >> work with you?  I wonder if there are 5 people here who you have not
> >> insulted.
> >
> > You people are too thin-skinned.  It is typical of the regs in this newsgroup.
> >
> > In some circles, it is considered a mark of acceptance when people insult
> > you.  Means you're in the group.  Means you can be trusted.
> >
> 
> I doubt if Ben is particularly bothered by being insulted by Fir.  And 
> certainly I consider my "primitive commonist blabler" status as marking 
> me in good company.
> 
> But I don't feel particularly motived to work with Fir on whatever 
> project he is thinking about - his insults whenever I have helped him in 
> the past make it unlikely that I would help him in the future.

Leaving aside his insults, I don't see how you could communicate effectively 
with Fir unless (perhaps) you speak Polish(?). His grasp of English is 
idiosyncratic and his ability/desire to express ideas clearly seems limited.

How could you possibly tell if you and he were talking about the same things?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#103596

W dniu piątek, 10 lutego 2017 09:48:03 UTC+1 użytkownik mark.b...@gmail.com napisał:
> On Thursday, 9 February 2017 20:31:02 UTC, David Brown  wrote:
> > On 09/02/17 21:04, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> > > In article <871sv76wxm.fsf@bsb.me.uk>,
> > > Ben Bacarisse  <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> wrote:
> > >> fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> writes:
> > >> <snip>
> > >>> real talk should be on real source so maybe project together?
> > >>>
> > >>> i wonder if some people would be interested in this.. if some like 5
> > >>> persons would participate there maybe something could be
> > >>> done..
> > >>
> > >> Do you think any of the people you've insulted are likely to want to
> > >> work with you?  I wonder if there are 5 people here who you have not
> > >> insulted.
> > >
> > > You people are too thin-skinned.  It is typical of the regs in this newsgroup.
> > >
> > > In some circles, it is considered a mark of acceptance when people insult
> > > you.  Means you're in the group.  Means you can be trusted.
> > >
> > 
> > I doubt if Ben is particularly bothered by being insulted by Fir.  And 
> > certainly I consider my "primitive commonist blabler" status as marking 
> > me in good company.
> > 
> > But I don't feel particularly motived to work with Fir on whatever 
> > project he is thinking about - his insults whenever I have helped him in 
> > the past make it unlikely that I would help him in the future.
> 
> Leaving aside his insults, I don't see how you could communicate effectively 
> with Fir unless (perhaps) you speak Polish(?). His grasp of English is 
> idiosyncratic and his ability/desire to express ideas clearly seems limited.
> 
> How could you possibly tell if you and he were talking about the same things?

i think lack of inteligence and 'down making' may be a more of a problem  - but you and brown with your 'spirits' are really not encouraged to participate, i dont want to go such low

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#103608

W dniu piątek, 10 lutego 2017 09:58:10 UTC+1 użytkownik fir napisał:
> W dniu piątek, 10 lutego 2017 09:48:03 UTC+1 użytkownik mark.b...@gmail.com napisał:
> > On Thursday, 9 February 2017 20:31:02 UTC, David Brown  wrote:
> > > On 09/02/17 21:04, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> > > > In article <871sv76wxm.fsf@bsb.me.uk>,
> > > > Ben Bacarisse  <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> wrote:
> > > >> fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> writes:
> > > >> <snip>
> > > >>> real talk should be on real source so maybe project together?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> i wonder if some people would be interested in this.. if some like 5
> > > >>> persons would participate there maybe something could be
> > > >>> done..
> > > >>
> > > >> Do you think any of the people you've insulted are likely to want to
> > > >> work with you?  I wonder if there are 5 people here who you have not
> > > >> insulted.
> > > >
> > > > You people are too thin-skinned.  It is typical of the regs in this newsgroup.
> > > >
> > > > In some circles, it is considered a mark of acceptance when people insult
> > > > you.  Means you're in the group.  Means you can be trusted.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > I doubt if Ben is particularly bothered by being insulted by Fir.  And 
> > > certainly I consider my "primitive commonist blabler" status as marking 
> > > me in good company.
> > > 
> > > But I don't feel particularly motived to work with Fir on whatever 
> > > project he is thinking about - his insults whenever I have helped him in 
> > > the past make it unlikely that I would help him in the future.
> > 
> > Leaving aside his insults, I don't see how you could communicate effectively 
> > with Fir unless (perhaps) you speak Polish(?). His grasp of English is 
> > idiosyncratic and his ability/desire to express ideas clearly seems limited.
> > 
> > How could you possibly tell if you and he were talking about the same things?
> 
> i think lack of inteligence and 'down making' may be a more of a problem  - but you and brown with your 'spirits' are really not encouraged to participate, i dont want to go such low

i mean 'not encouraged' but still you could join it 
if you want i only hope you better not ;c (and i wouldnt like to spend to much time on foam making)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#103675

W dniu piątek, 10 lutego 2017 09:48:03 UTC+1 użytkownik mark.b...@gmail.com napisał:
> On Thursday, 9 February 2017 20:31:02 UTC, David Brown  wrote:
> > On 09/02/17 21:04, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> > > In article <871sv76wxm.fsf@bsb.me.uk>,
> > > Ben Bacarisse  <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> wrote:
> > >> fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> writes:
> > >> <snip>
> > >>> real talk should be on real source so maybe project together?
> > >>>
> > >>> i wonder if some people would be interested in this.. if some like 5
> > >>> persons would participate there maybe something could be
> > >>> done..
> > >>
> > >> Do you think any of the people you've insulted are likely to want to
> > >> work with you?  I wonder if there are 5 people here who you have not
> > >> insulted.
> > >
> > > You people are too thin-skinned.  It is typical of the regs in this newsgroup.
> > >
> > > In some circles, it is considered a mark of acceptance when people insult
> > > you.  Means you're in the group.  Means you can be trusted.
> > >
> > 
> > I doubt if Ben is particularly bothered by being insulted by Fir.  And 
> > certainly I consider my "primitive commonist blabler" status as marking 
> > me in good company.
> > 
> > But I don't feel particularly motived to work with Fir on whatever 
> > project he is thinking about - his insults whenever I have helped him in 
> > the past make it unlikely that I would help him in the future.
> 
> Leaving aside his insults, I don't see how you could communicate effectively 
> with Fir unless (perhaps) you speak Polish(?). His grasp of English is 
> idiosyncratic and his ability/desire to express ideas clearly seems limited.
> 
> How could you possibly tell if you and he were talking about the same things?

besides dont belive i write in polish much better ;-)
as to brown at least he recently once wrote one post
with i could agree - and this is quite uncommon

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#103777

On 10/02/17 09:47, mark.bluemel@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 February 2017 20:31:02 UTC, David Brown  wrote:
>> On 09/02/17 21:04, Kenny McCormack wrote:
>>> In article <871sv76wxm.fsf@bsb.me.uk>,
>>> Ben Bacarisse  <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> wrote:
>>>> fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> <snip>
>>>>> real talk should be on real source so maybe project together?
>>>>>
>>>>> i wonder if some people would be interested in this.. if some like 5
>>>>> persons would participate there maybe something could be
>>>>> done..
>>>>
>>>> Do you think any of the people you've insulted are likely to want to
>>>> work with you?  I wonder if there are 5 people here who you have not
>>>> insulted.
>>>
>>> You people are too thin-skinned.  It is typical of the regs in this newsgroup.
>>>
>>> In some circles, it is considered a mark of acceptance when people insult
>>> you.  Means you're in the group.  Means you can be trusted.
>>>
>>
>> I doubt if Ben is particularly bothered by being insulted by Fir.  And 
>> certainly I consider my "primitive commonist blabler" status as marking 
>> me in good company.
>>
>> But I don't feel particularly motived to work with Fir on whatever 
>> project he is thinking about - his insults whenever I have helped him in 
>> the past make it unlikely that I would help him in the future.
> 
> Leaving aside his insults, I don't see how you could communicate effectively 
> with Fir unless (perhaps) you speak Polish(?). His grasp of English is 
> idiosyncratic and his ability/desire to express ideas clearly seems limited.
> 

My understanding is that his Polish writing is not much clearer than his
English.  He believes that he is a "philosopher" and is "above" such
"common" things as using language in the same way as other people.
People who try to communicate with standard grammar or spelling (in any
language) are mere "commonists" - as a philosopher and higher thinker,
Fir is beyond such petty details.  Going out of his way to make himself
understood is a waste of his precious time.

His command of English is much, much better than would appear from his
posts.  He /can/ make himself understood if he wants, assuming he has
something intelligible to say.  He simply does not want his words to be
easily understood - mere mortals are not supposed to be able to
understand him.


> How could you possibly tell if you and he were talking about the same things?
> 

Well, indeed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#103662

On 02/10/17 09:30 AM, David Brown wrote:
> On 09/02/17 21:04, Kenny McCormack wrote:
>> In article <871sv76wxm.fsf@bsb.me.uk>,
>> Ben Bacarisse  <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you think any of the people you've insulted are likely to want to
>>> work with you?  I wonder if there are 5 people here who you have not
>>> insulted.
>>
>> You people are too thin-skinned.  It is typical of the regs in this newsgroup.
>>
>> In some circles, it is considered a mark of acceptance when people insult
>> you.  Means you're in the group.  Means you can be trusted.
>>
>
> I doubt if Ben is particularly bothered by being insulted by Fir.

It's a bit like being savaged by a toothless sheep.

-- 
Ian

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#103678

On 02/11/2017 01:08 AM, Ian Collins wrote:
> On 02/10/17 09:30 AM, David Brown wrote:
...
>> I doubt if Ben is particularly bothered by being insulted by Fir.
>
> It's a bit like being savaged by a toothless sheep.

Sheep can get pretty big (Ewes 45-100 kg, Rams 45-160 kg), they have 
teeth and hooves, and some breeds have horns. It's very unusual for one 
to attack a human, but if one did seem interested in doing so, I'd 
recommend being a little bit more worried about that fact than you are 
about being insulted by fir.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#103778

On 11/02/17 16:02, James R. Kuyper wrote:
> On 02/11/2017 01:08 AM, Ian Collins wrote:
>> On 02/10/17 09:30 AM, David Brown wrote:
> ...
>>> I doubt if Ben is particularly bothered by being insulted by Fir.
>>
>> It's a bit like being savaged by a toothless sheep.
> 
> Sheep can get pretty big (Ewes 45-100 kg, Rams 45-160 kg), they have
> teeth and hooves, and some breeds have horns. It's very unusual for one
> to attack a human, but if one did seem interested in doing so, I'd
> recommend being a little bit more worried about that fact than you are
> about being insulted by fir.
> 

OK, it's a bit like being savaged by a particularly self-important but
toothless gerbil.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#103810

On 02/11/2017 10:02 AM, James R. Kuyper wrote:
> On 02/11/2017 01:08 AM, Ian Collins wrote:
>> On 02/10/17 09:30 AM, David Brown wrote:
> ...
>>> I doubt if Ben is particularly bothered by being insulted by Fir.
>>
>> It's a bit like being savaged by a toothless sheep.
>
> Sheep can get pretty big (Ewes 45-100 kg, Rams 45-160 kg), they have
> teeth and hooves, and some breeds have horns. ...

My apologies - I missed the "toothless" modifier. The rest of my comment 
still stands.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#103549

On Thursday, February 9, 2017 at 1:17:02 PM UTC-5, fir wrote:
> i would suggest writing some simple assembler for invented virtual
> machine/ then also this virtual machine

February 22, 2014, version 0.70 (7th revision) to my original 2012
design to create a new virtual machine (called VVM) with its own
assembler (called VASM):

    https://github.com/RickCHodgin/libsf-full/blob/master/documentation/vvm/OBED/vvm_dll_relationships_0.70.png

Current version:

    https://github.com/RickCHodgin/libsf-full/tree/master/documentation/vvm/OBED

Development on Visual FreePro (full version) is suspended pending the
completion of Visual FreePro, Jr.  I plan on coming back to the full
version of Visual FreePro after completing Visual FreePro, Jr., my
RDC compiler framework, CAlive, and my current LSA (assembler):

    https://github.com/RickCHodgin/libsf/tree/master/exodus/tools/lsa

It's a lot of work.  I have asked for help on these projects since I
began them on July 12, 2012.  I have received little help since that
time.  Some help mostly came in 2015 for a few months, and through a
Christian brother who didn't have high C/C++ programming skills, but
who was very encouraging to me from 2012 on.

I have used your very request above in the OP as my project's banner:

    http://www.libsf.org

    "In God's sight, we've come together.
     We've come together to help each other.
     Let's grow this project up ... together!
     In service and Love to The Lord, forever!"

Your goals are very close to being Christian goals, fir.  You just
hold on to worldly things like being mean, angry, hurting other
people, and rejecting Jesus Christ as nonsensical.

Perhaps you were wrong in that summary assessment.

Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#103555

W dniu czwartek, 9 lutego 2017 19:46:30 UTC+1 użytkownik Rick C. Hodgin napisał:
> On Thursday, February 9, 2017 at 1:17:02 PM UTC-5, fir wrote:
> > i would suggest writing some simple assembler for invented virtual
> > machine/ then also this virtual machine
> 
> February 22, 2014, version 0.70 (7th revision) to my original 2012
> design to create a new virtual machine (called VVM) with its own
> assembler (called VASM):
> 
>     https://github.com/RickCHodgin/libsf-full/blob/master/documentation/vvm/OBED/vvm_dll_relationships_0.70.png
> 
> Current version:
> 
>     https://github.com/RickCHodgin/libsf-full/tree/master/documentation/vvm/OBED
> 
> Development on Visual FreePro (full version) is suspended pending the
> completion of Visual FreePro, Jr.  I plan on coming back to the full
> version of Visual FreePro after completing Visual FreePro, Jr., my
> RDC compiler framework, CAlive, and my current LSA (assembler):
> 
>     https://github.com/RickCHodgin/libsf/tree/master/exodus/tools/lsa
> 
> It's a lot of work.  I have asked for help on these projects since I
> began them on July 12, 2012.  I have received little help since that
> time.  Some help mostly came in 2015 for a few months, and through a
> Christian brother who didn't have high C/C++ programming skills, but
> who was very encouraging to me from 2012 on.
> 
> I have used your very request above in the OP as my project's banner:
> 
>     http://www.libsf.org
> 
>     "In God's sight, we've come together.
>      We've come together to help each other.
>      Let's grow this project up ... together!
>      In service and Love to The Lord, forever!"
> 
> Your goals are very close to being Christian goals, fir.  You just
> hold on to worldly things like being mean, angry, hurting other
> people, and rejecting Jesus Christ as nonsensical.
> 
> Perhaps you were wrong in that summary assessment.
> 
skip the bible blabla 

providing the source (on point or for something related)
its not the wy i got on mind, coz i mean building it
from scrach where all fragment will be rediscussed 
on this group and ar participants would understand it and
share some remarks (i could be coordinator in such kind 
of discussion) - but you could used your source as a 
resource for easy providing pieces if you got that

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#103561

W dniu czwartek, 9 lutego 2017 20:06:25 UTC+1 użytkownik fir napisał:
> W dniu czwartek, 9 lutego 2017 19:46:30 UTC+1 użytkownik Rick C. Hodgin napisał:
> > On Thursday, February 9, 2017 at 1:17:02 PM UTC-5, fir wrote:
> > > i would suggest writing some simple assembler for invented virtual
> > > machine/ then also this virtual machine
> > 
> > February 22, 2014, version 0.70 (7th revision) to my original 2012
> > design to create a new virtual machine (called VVM) with its own
> > assembler (called VASM):
> > 
> >     https://github.com/RickCHodgin/libsf-full/blob/master/documentation/vvm/OBED/vvm_dll_relationships_0.70.png
> > 
> > Current version:
> > 
> >     https://github.com/RickCHodgin/libsf-full/tree/master/documentation/vvm/OBED
> > 
> > Development on Visual FreePro (full version) is suspended pending the
> > completion of Visual FreePro, Jr.  I plan on coming back to the full
> > version of Visual FreePro after completing Visual FreePro, Jr., my
> > RDC compiler framework, CAlive, and my current LSA (assembler):
> > 
> >     https://github.com/RickCHodgin/libsf/tree/master/exodus/tools/lsa
> > 
> > It's a lot of work.  I have asked for help on these projects since I
> > began them on July 12, 2012.  I have received little help since that
> > time.  Some help mostly came in 2015 for a few months, and through a
> > Christian brother who didn't have high C/C++ programming skills, but
> > who was very encouraging to me from 2012 on.
> > 
> > I have used your very request above in the OP as my project's banner:
> > 
> >     http://www.libsf.org
> > 
> >     "In God's sight, we've come together.
> >      We've come together to help each other.
> >      Let's grow this project up ... together!
> >      In service and Love to The Lord, forever!"
> > 
> > Your goals are very close to being Christian goals, fir.  You just
> > hold on to worldly things like being mean, angry, hurting other
> > people, and rejecting Jesus Christ as nonsensical.
> > 
> > Perhaps you were wrong in that summary assessment.
> > 
> skip the bible blabla 
> 
> providing the source (on point or for something related)
> its not the wy i got on mind, coz i mean building it
> from scrach where all fragment will be rediscussed 
> on this group and ar participants would understand it and
> share some remarks (i could be coordinator in such kind 
> of discussion) - but you could used your source as a 
> resource for easy providing pieces if you got that

we could rediscuss points to accomplish, accomplish them, rediscus them a bit, establish another points and see how far it can go in two or three weeks..
such kind of work rises motivation nd would make better 
content on this forum
but i dont want to do it in 2 people, at least 4 would be needed imo, and also they should conform to those rules
im sayin in (as i got  vision how it should look like 
nd could coordinte it)..

imagine boring discussion about nearly nothing gone and some real code and real matter appears (this is relly thing to do)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#103564

W dniu czwartek, 9 lutego 2017 21:06:57 UTC+1 użytkownik fir napisał:
> W dniu czwartek, 9 lutego 2017 20:06:25 UTC+1 użytkownik fir napisał:
> > W dniu czwartek, 9 lutego 2017 19:46:30 UTC+1 użytkownik Rick C. Hodgin napisał:
> > > On Thursday, February 9, 2017 at 1:17:02 PM UTC-5, fir wrote:
> > > > i would suggest writing some simple assembler for invented virtual
> > > > machine/ then also this virtual machine
> > > 
> > > February 22, 2014, version 0.70 (7th revision) to my original 2012
> > > design to create a new virtual machine (called VVM) with its own
> > > assembler (called VASM):
> > > 
> > >     https://github.com/RickCHodgin/libsf-full/blob/master/documentation/vvm/OBED/vvm_dll_relationships_0.70.png
> > > 
> > > Current version:
> > > 
> > >     https://github.com/RickCHodgin/libsf-full/tree/master/documentation/vvm/OBED
> > > 
> > > Development on Visual FreePro (full version) is suspended pending the
> > > completion of Visual FreePro, Jr.  I plan on coming back to the full
> > > version of Visual FreePro after completing Visual FreePro, Jr., my
> > > RDC compiler framework, CAlive, and my current LSA (assembler):
> > > 
> > >     https://github.com/RickCHodgin/libsf/tree/master/exodus/tools/lsa
> > > 
> > > It's a lot of work.  I have asked for help on these projects since I
> > > began them on July 12, 2012.  I have received little help since that
> > > time.  Some help mostly came in 2015 for a few months, and through a
> > > Christian brother who didn't have high C/C++ programming skills, but
> > > who was very encouraging to me from 2012 on.
> > > 
> > > I have used your very request above in the OP as my project's banner:
> > > 
> > >     http://www.libsf.org
> > > 
> > >     "In God's sight, we've come together.
> > >      We've come together to help each other.
> > >      Let's grow this project up ... together!
> > >      In service and Love to The Lord, forever!"
> > > 
> > > Your goals are very close to being Christian goals, fir.  You just
> > > hold on to worldly things like being mean, angry, hurting other
> > > people, and rejecting Jesus Christ as nonsensical.
> > > 
> > > Perhaps you were wrong in that summary assessment.
> > > 
> > skip the bible blabla 
> > 
> > providing the source (on point or for something related)
> > its not the wy i got on mind, coz i mean building it
> > from scrach where all fragment will be rediscussed 
> > on this group and ar participants would understand it and
> > share some remarks (i could be coordinator in such kind 
> > of discussion) - but you could used your source as a 
> > resource for easy providing pieces if you got that
> 
> we could rediscuss points to accomplish, accomplish them, rediscus them a bit, establish another points and see how far it can go in two or three weeks..
> such kind of work rises motivation nd would make better 
> content on this forum
> but i dont want to do it in 2 people, at least 4 would be needed imo, and also they should conform to those rules
> im sayin in (as i got  vision how it should look like 
> nd could coordinte it)..
> 
> imagine boring discussion about nearly nothing gone and some real code and real matter appears (this is relly thing to do)

there is weekend comin so maybe i will wait TILL MONDAY if some would say they maybe would like to try how it would look like ..
i may assure (90% assurance) that i would have energy to conduct that at least in early stages to see if something
come out of that 
(important is though i would be given to coordinate it a bit - not a code but some basic discussion  )

if no the idea may be repeated after half a year or after a year (i recently to much bored to work alone, also to much bored to discuss on nothing but talking on some real 
(and quite simple nothing too eleborate) coding seem be
more interesting).. so think a bit on it

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#103592

On Thursday, February 9, 2017 at 8:18:21 PM UTC, fir wrote:
> W dniu czwartek, 9 lutego 2017 21:06:57 UTC+1 użytkownik fir napisał:
>
> > imagine boring discussion about nearly nothing gone and some 
> > real code and real matter appears (this is relly thing to do)
> 
> there is weekend comin so maybe i will wait TILL MONDAY if some 
> would say they maybe would like to try how it would look like ..
> i may assure (90% assurance) that i would have energy to conduct 
> that at least in early stages to see if something
> come out of that 
> (important is though i would be given to coordinate it a bit - not
> a code but some basic discussion  )
> 
> if no the idea may be repeated after half a year or after a year
> (i recently to much bored to work alone, also to much bored to 
> discuss on nothing but talking on some real 
> (and quite simple nothing too eleborate) coding seem be
> more interesting).. so think a bit on it
>
I've got two substantial github projects, the binary image library
and Baby X.

The binary image library is essentially in version 1.0, most of the
obvious features are there. In its nature it just grows little by
little.

Baby X needs more attention than I've been able to give it. It 
substantially works on Windows and Linux but it needs a lot more on
visual appearance, a port to Mac OsX, and general use for mini-projects
to flush out problems. There aren't many cross-platform windows toolkits
out there.
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c

csiph-web