Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #43262 > unrolled thread

some c.l.c. oldies

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c

Contents

  some c.l.c. oldies Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-04-21 23:15 +0000
    Re: some c.l.c. oldies Jens Schweikhardt <usenet@schweikhardt.net> - 2014-04-23 20:53 +0000

#43262 — some c.l.c. oldies

Kaz on goto, August 1996, message ID <4vknm4$pqa@latte.cafe.net>:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.lang.c/KCSpJE0KF0k/DmeMM1PcgJAJ

Kaz on large numbers of parameters and globals, Dec 1996,
Message ID <58n4ln$96f@bcrkh13.bnr.ca>:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.lang.c/JH_XjmBJ6U8/vYmvYyqp15QJ

Kaz disagrees with with pedant Dan Pop that C has no "activation records".
November 1996, message ID <56t456$pe3@bcrkh13.bnr.ca>:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.lang.c/fO1R4NrAQ9w/g7nu1rzbOQgJ

(However, I hasten to add that I would trade ten modern-age "c.l.c. regs" to
have Dan Pop back, mind you.)

Google's archive doesn't seem to go back before some point in 1996, or it's not indexed.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#43462

Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> wrote
	in <20140421155817.245@kylheku.com>:
...
# (However, I hasten to add that I would trade ten modern-age "c.l.c. regs" to
# have Dan Pop back, mind you.)

Plus Tanmoy Bhattacharya, if you ask me. Always civilized and contenance
above all, like a snooker player.

Anyone remember Scott Nudds and his portable assembler thread?
Modern trolls are so lame. I want more "so nineties" entertainment!

Regards,

	Jens
-- 
Jens Schweikhardt http://www.schweikhardt.net/
SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped)

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c

csiph-web