Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #17807 > unrolled thread

Re: standard include files

Started byIan Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
First post2012-02-23 13:48 +1300
Last post2012-02-23 13:48 +1300
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: standard include files Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-23 13:48 +1300

#17807 — Re: standard include files

FromIan Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
Date2012-02-23 13:48 +1300
SubjectRe: standard include files
Message-ID<9qlgm9Fht0U1@mid.individual.net>
On 02/23/12 01:38 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
>    There was a discussion once about why people do not simply
>    include all possible standard headers, so that they do not
>    have to be so careful when choosing the needed ones.
>
>    Someone said that not including all possible standard
>    headers does reduce the possibility of standard names
>    defined in them colliding with user names. (Also including
>    future C versions, where a name might be defined by the
>    standard that is not defined now.)
>
>    But aren't all standard identifiers reserved anyway,
>    independently of whether the corresponding header is
>    included or not?

They may be reserved, but that reservation isn't enforced.

-- 
Ian Collins

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c


csiph-web