Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #17807 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-02-23 13:48 +1300 |
| Last post | 2012-02-23 13:48 +1300 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: standard include files Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-23 13:48 +1300
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-02-23 13:48 +1300 |
| Subject | Re: standard include files |
| Message-ID | <9qlgm9Fht0U1@mid.individual.net> |
On 02/23/12 01:38 PM, Stefan Ram wrote: > There was a discussion once about why people do not simply > include all possible standard headers, so that they do not > have to be so careful when choosing the needed ones. > > Someone said that not including all possible standard > headers does reduce the possibility of standard names > defined in them colliding with user names. (Also including > future C versions, where a name might be defined by the > standard that is not defined now.) > > But aren't all standard identifiers reserved anyway, > independently of whether the corresponding header is > included or not? They may be reserved, but that reservation isn't enforced. -- Ian Collins
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c
csiph-web