Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #10900 > unrolled thread

ot: sky falling

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c

Contents

  ot: sky falling Uno <merrilljensen@q.com> - 2011-09-24 21:22 -0700
    Re: ot: sky falling Uno <merrilljensen@q.com> - 2011-09-26 21:49 -0700

#10900 — ot: sky falling

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-20111230-93/nasas-falling-satellite-caught-on-video/

These fora are littered with people involved in aerospace.  While I 
can't see anything these people on the above link are talking about, 
they *sound like* people who don't go "ooh aah" at the sky without there 
being a corresponding event.

Anyone know more?  Would the more-massive pieces necessarily hit after 
the less-massive?

I saw a C-47 take off today.  Felt it too; I suspect that the runway for 
the senior-citizen aircraft goes right over me.  It's about the opposite 
of an F-35 doing the same thing.

Cheers from Amiland,
-- 
Uno

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#10991

On 9/24/2011 9:22 PM, Uno wrote:
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-20111230-93/nasas-falling-satellite-caught-on-video/
>
>
> These fora are littered with people involved in aerospace. While I can't
> see anything these people on the above link are talking about, they
> *sound like* people who don't go "ooh aah" at the sky without there
> being a corresponding event.
>
> Anyone know more? Would the more-massive pieces necessarily hit after
> the less-massive?
>
> I saw a C-47 take off today. Felt it too; I suspect that the runway for
> the senior-citizen aircraft goes right over me. It's about the opposite
> of an F-35 doing the same thing.
>
> Cheers from Amiland,

What no one?

You didn't read it, hear it, see it?

-- 
Uno

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c

csiph-web