Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #15504 > unrolled thread
| Started by | jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-01-07 00:02 +0100 |
| Last post | 2012-03-07 16:18 -0800 |
| Articles | 2 on this page of 42 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c
The container abstraction and parallel programming jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-01-07 00:02 +0100
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2012-01-06 15:08 -0800
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-01-07 00:27 +0100
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2012-01-06 15:30 -0800
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-01-07 00:41 +0100
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-07 00:04 +0000
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-01-07 09:06 +0100
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-08 03:42 -0800
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-07 13:50 +1300
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-01-07 09:31 +0100
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-07 22:03 +1300
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-01-07 07:39 -0600
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 09:27 -0800
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-01-08 11:37 -0600
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-01-08 18:42 +0100
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-01-08 11:48 +0100
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-01-08 11:16 +0000
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-01-08 11:52 -0600
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-08 14:17 -0800
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-01-08 22:08 -0500
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-01-09 11:07 -0600
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-09 14:55 -0800
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-01-09 00:22 +0100
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-01-09 14:19 +0000
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-01-09 16:40 +0000
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-09 17:53 +0000
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> - 2012-01-10 16:58 -0800
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-07 01:28 -0600
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-01-07 09:39 +0100
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-01-07 09:54 +0100
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-01-07 11:36 +0100
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-01-08 08:08 +0000
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-01-08 11:41 +0100
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-01-08 11:53 +0100
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-01-08 11:59 +0100
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-01-08 11:05 +0000
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-01-08 12:29 +0100
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-01-08 13:35 +0000
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-01-09 01:09 -0800
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-01-26 09:23 -0800
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-01-26 23:41 +0100
Re: The container abstraction and parallel programming Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-07 16:18 -0800
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-01-26 23:41 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <jfskq9$10h$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #16263 |
Le 26/01/12 18:23, Tim Rentsch a écrit : >> That was the main argument of my post and nobody has given a sensible >> answer to it. [snip] > > The problem is, no one other than yourself finds your argument > persuasive, let alone convincing. Does that give you any sort > of pause or prompt any further reflection? Yes. I am reading "SIMD programming manual" by Paul Cockshott and Kenneth Renfrew (Springer 2004) where those authors propose exactly what I am proposing here. Ignorance is widespread in this group, and that, combined with a desire to attack anything I say because I am not "GNU" makes for discussions like the one we are having: People that like to piss around, making short ironical sentences like you do, without ever trying to understand what I am proposing, nor reflecting about the fact that gcc is unable to parallelize automatically a simple construct like the one I presented. Why bother with facts? Just tell the guy: > The problem is, no one other than yourself finds your argument > persuasive, let alone convincing. Does that give you any sort > of pause or prompt any further reflection?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-07 16:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <kfnzkbsvtay.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> |
| In reply to | #16274 |
jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> writes:
> Le 26/01/12 18:23, Tim Rentsch a @C3{A9}crit :
>>> That was the main argument of my post and nobody has given a sensible
>>> answer to it. [snip]
>>
>> The problem is, no one other than yourself finds your argument
>> persuasive, let alone convincing. Does that give you any sort
>> of pause or prompt any further reflection?
>
> Yes. I am reading "SIMD programming manual" by Paul Cockshott and
> Kenneth Renfrew (Springer 2004) where those authors propose exactly
> what I am proposing here.
That isn't really an answer to the question.
> Ignorance is widespread in this group, and that, combined with a desire
> to attack anything I say because I am not "GNU" makes for discussions
> like the one we are having: People that like to piss around, making
> short ironical sentences like you do,
I wasn't being ironical, or pissing around. I was asking
a serious, non-rhetorical question that was intended to
further the conversation. Can you see the difference
between those two kinds of behaviors?
> without ever trying to understand what I am proposing, nor
> reflecting about the fact that gcc is unable to parallelize
> automatically a simple construct like the one I presented. [snip]
I don't know how you are in person, but based on how you
act in the newsgroup I believe you would be described as
a narcissist. As long as you act like a narcissist it
will be difficult to get people to take your proposals
seriously, regardless of any technical merit they might have.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c
csiph-web