Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #91375 > unrolled thread

Re: C++ Builder - Free License

Started byjacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr>
First post2016-07-30 21:09 +0200
Last post2016-07-30 20:20 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: C++ Builder - Free License jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-07-30 21:09 +0200
    Re: C++ Builder - Free License Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-30 20:20 +0100

#91375 — Re: C++ Builder - Free License

Fromjacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr>
Date2016-07-30 21:09 +0200
SubjectRe: C++ Builder - Free License
Message-ID<nniu1l$8ah$1@dont-email.me>
Le 30/07/2016 à 06:11, Good Guy a écrit :
> For those interested in a free download of C++ Builder starter Edition
> then use this link:
>
> <https://www.embarcadero.com/app-development-tools-store/cbuilder>
>
> Scroll down and you will see the ICON that looks like this:
>
> Download Link
> <http://content.screencast.com/users/JT19560819/folders/Jing/media/cc2cc54b-cb0c-4286-960d-cb4f3fa9f20f/2016-07-30_0505.png>
>
> --
> With over 350 million devices now running Windows 10, customer
> satisfaction is higher than any previous version of windows.

Yeah, I am missing Mr Thompson "clarifications" here. He is always so 
prompt for pointing out that lcc-win is not free, etc.

But for obvious rubbish like this, he doesn't say anything.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#91376

FromBen Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>
Date2016-07-30 20:20 +0100
Message-ID<87r3abvsoe.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
In reply to#91375
jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> writes:

> Le 30/07/2016 à 06:11, Good Guy a écrit :
<spam snipped>
> Yeah, I am missing Mr Thompson "clarifications" here. He is always so
> prompt for pointing out that lcc-win is not free, etc.
>
> But for obvious rubbish like this, he doesn't say anything.

Why would anyone reply to obvious spam?  Why did you repeat the links?

-- 
Ben.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c


csiph-web