Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #148741 > unrolled thread

C library topicality

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c

Contents

  C library topicality Mehdi Amini <atorrses@gmail.com> - 2020-01-04 13:58 +0330
    Re: C library topicality fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2020-01-04 02:36 -0800
    Re: C library topicality Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2020-01-04 16:51 +0100
      Re: C library topicality fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 10:28 -0800
        Re: C library topicality Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2020-01-08 21:15 -0400
          Re: C library topicality chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2020-01-09 06:22 -0800
          Re: C library topicality fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2020-01-09 12:56 -0800
            Re: C library topicality Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2020-01-09 21:30 -0400
              Re: C library topicality fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2020-01-10 00:22 -0800
                Re: C library topicality Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2020-01-10 21:20 -0400
                  Re: C library topicality fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2020-01-10 22:58 -0800
                    Re: C library topicality fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2020-01-11 00:17 -0800
                      Re: C library topicality Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-11 00:47 -0800
                        Re: C library topicality fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2020-01-11 00:55 -0800
                          Re: C library topicality fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2020-01-11 01:17 -0800
                            Re: C library topicality Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-11 01:29 -0800
                              Re: C library topicality fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2020-01-11 01:38 -0800
                                Re: C library topicality fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2020-01-11 05:58 -0800
                              Re: C library topicality Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-01-11 10:01 +0000
                                Re: C library topicality fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2020-01-11 02:15 -0800
                                  Re: C library topicality fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2020-01-11 02:22 -0800
                                    Re: C library topicality fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2020-01-11 05:42 -0800
                        Re: C library topicality Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-01-11 09:55 -0800
    Re: C library topicality John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2020-01-07 13:14 -0800
      Re: C library topicality chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 09:12 -0800
        Re: C library topicality John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 10:13 -0800

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#148930

W dniu sobota, 11 stycznia 2020 11:15:19 UTC+1 użytkownik fir napisał:
> W dniu sobota, 11 stycznia 2020 11:01:26 UTC+1 użytkownik Jorgen Grahn napisał:
> > On Sat, 2020-01-11, Öö Tiib wrote:
> > > On Saturday, 11 January 2020 11:17:33 UTC+2, fir  wrote:
> > ...
> > > So were you complaining that people ask questions that you do not like?
> > > Or that people tell that they do not like questions? Or what?
> > 
> > I don't think asking fir to explain what he means ever paid off.
> > 
> > Far upthread he wrote something that actually makes sense:
> > 
> >     "What this group needs is more real C coding discussion, and keep
> >     those weird people who only read standard and not program in C
> >     more in the box."
> > 
> > (I fixed some of the grammar). So I guess in context, he meant that
> > third-party libraries should be on topic, so that there can be more
> > discussion about practical C programming.  And less discussion about
> > details of the standard.
> > 
> 
> relatively less, i do not oppose to talk on standard here (though im not in terested i am for sure able to just skip it) - but the attempts of that standard freaks to throw out the real practical c coding as offtopis is harmfull
> 
> besides hovever note, in other place i mentioned another importan thing: what is good and what become bad depends also on quality and quantity

note for example if someone would ask things specific for unix or windows/winapi (the latter i could do as its my c environment ) it simply may get no answer, but it also may get some answer as sometimes problems related to platformhave some genaralized area that can be talked even for those who are not
in that platform

so i think someone could just try, if it simply get no answer after like 3 or 5 attempts this threads will probably die in natural life 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#148932

W dniu sobota, 11 stycznia 2020 11:22:12 UTC+1 użytkownik fir napisał:
> W dniu sobota, 11 stycznia 2020 11:15:19 UTC+1 użytkownik fir napisał:
> > W dniu sobota, 11 stycznia 2020 11:01:26 UTC+1 użytkownik Jorgen Grahn napisał:
> > > On Sat, 2020-01-11, Öö Tiib wrote:
> > > > On Saturday, 11 January 2020 11:17:33 UTC+2, fir  wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > So were you complaining that people ask questions that you do not like?
> > > > Or that people tell that they do not like questions? Or what?
> > > 
> > > I don't think asking fir to explain what he means ever paid off.
> > > 
> > > Far upthread he wrote something that actually makes sense:
> > > 
> > >     "What this group needs is more real C coding discussion, and keep
> > >     those weird people who only read standard and not program in C
> > >     more in the box."
> > > 
> > > (I fixed some of the grammar). So I guess in context, he meant that
> > > third-party libraries should be on topic, so that there can be more
> > > discussion about practical C programming.  And less discussion about
> > > details of the standard.
> > > 
> > 
> > relatively less, i do not oppose to talk on standard here (though im not in terested i am for sure able to just skip it) - but the attempts of that standard freaks to throw out the real practical c coding as offtopis is harmfull
> > 
> > besides hovever note, in other place i mentioned another importan thing: what is good and what become bad depends also on quality and quantity
> 
> note for example if someone would ask things specific for unix or windows/winapi (the latter i could do as its my c environment ) it simply may get no answer, but it also may get some answer as sometimes problems related to platformhave some genaralized area that can be talked even for those who are not
> in that platform
> 
> so i think someone could just try, if it simply get no answer after like 3 or 5 attempts this threads will probably die in natural life

getting back to asm

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#148937

Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> writes:
> On Saturday, 11 January 2020 10:17:55 UTC+2, fir  wrote:
[28 lines deleted]
>
> I definitely do not understand what you are writing. Indeed it
> seems that you are angry and calling names and complaining about
> something, but what it really is ... is hard to decipher.

I don't see what fir writes unless someone quotes it.  Please don't
unless it's relevant.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
    [Note updated email address]
Working, but not speaking, for Philips Healthcare
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#148863

On Saturday, January 4, 2020 at 4:28:36 AM UTC-6, Mehdi Amini Valashani son of Bahram wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Is it topical for this news-group to discuss C libraries like GTK and
> Glib ?
> 
> Links:
> 
> https://www.gtk.org/
> https://developer.gnome.org/glib/
> 
> -- 
> www.my-c-codes.com/
> 
> Farewell.

Not really, no.  This newsgroup is (mostly) devoted to discussion of the C language itself
and not specific implementations (although that sometimes comes up in context of 
particular language issues).  

You will get better information on those external libraries from other newsgroups
or forums like Stack Overflow.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#148873

On Tuesday, January 7, 2020 at 1:14:31 PM UTC-8, John Bode wrote:
> On Saturday, January 4, 2020 at 4:28:36 AM UTC-6, Mehdi Amini Valashani son of Bahram wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Is it topical for this news-group to discuss C libraries like GTK and
> > Glib ?
> > 
> > Links:
> > 
> > https://www.gtk.org/
> > https://developer.gnome.org/glib/
> > 
> > -- 
> > www.my-c-codes.com/
> > 
> > Farewell.
> 
> Not really, no.  This newsgroup is (mostly) devoted to discussion of the C language itself
> and not specific implementations (although that sometimes comes up in context of 
> particular language issues).  
> 
> You will get better information on those external libraries from other newsgroups
> or forums like Stack Overflow.

Stack Overflow kind of blows. If you take advice from the wrong person, you could possibly end up with a bug that originated from a person on that site.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#148874

On Wednesday, January 8, 2020 at 11:12:30 AM UTC-6, chad wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 7, 2020 at 1:14:31 PM UTC-8, John Bode wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 4, 2020 at 4:28:36 AM UTC-6, Mehdi Amini Valashani son of Bahram wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Is it topical for this news-group to discuss C libraries like GTK and
> > > Glib ?
> > > 
> > > Links:
> > > 
> > > https://www.gtk.org/
> > > https://developer.gnome.org/glib/
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > www.my-c-codes.com/
> > > 
> > > Farewell.
> > 
> > Not really, no.  This newsgroup is (mostly) devoted to discussion of the C language itself
> > and not specific implementations (although that sometimes comes up in context of 
> > particular language issues).  
> > 
> > You will get better information on those external libraries from other newsgroups
> > or forums like Stack Overflow.
> 
> Stack Overflow kind of blows. If you take advice from the wrong person, you could 
> possibly end up with a bug that originated from a person on that site.

That's just as true here, or in any other newsgroup.  

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c

csiph-web