Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #92591 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-22 10:13 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-12-14 12:23 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 380 — 40 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c
The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-22 10:13 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-22 10:22 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth bert <bert.hutchings@btinternet.com> - 2016-08-22 10:38 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-08-22 13:44 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-22 10:50 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-22 10:48 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Gene Buckle" <gene.buckle@bbs.retroarchive.org.remove-1029-this> - 2016-08-23 10:10 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-08-23 13:35 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-08-26 07:19 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 05:46 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-08-29 15:04 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 06:28 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-08-29 11:23 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Richard Dawkins <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-08-29 17:57 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 10:07 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-08-29 17:36 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2016-08-29 20:18 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-08-29 14:39 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-08-29 17:06 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-12-02 20:53 +0100
[OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 17:59 +0800
[OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 03:32 -0800
[OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 04:03 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 20:26 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 04:39 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 20:51 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-12-03 13:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-12-05 13:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 11:07 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 11:32 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 11:40 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 11:52 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 12:02 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 12:32 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 12:37 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 12:45 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 12:54 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 13:27 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 13:36 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 13:59 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 13:09 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 15:05 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 15:20 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth ImperiusDamian <damianblack.wolf@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 20:05 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 17:12 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth ImperiusDamian <damianblack.wolf@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 13:31 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 00:52 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 01:06 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 01:21 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 01:30 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth ImperiusDamian <damianblack.wolf@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 20:10 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 17:18 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-12-13 14:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 11:24 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Robert Spanjaard <spamtrap@arumes.com> - 2016-12-13 21:04 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 12:53 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Robert Spanjaard <spamtrap@arumes.com> - 2016-12-13 22:19 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 13:55 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 14:06 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-12-14 14:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 11:44 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 12:07 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Robert Spanjaard <spamtrap@arumes.com> - 2016-12-14 23:02 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 17:47 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Robert Spanjaard <spamtrap@arumes.com> - 2016-12-15 17:40 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 08:53 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-12-15 16:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 09:15 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-12-15 17:33 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 09:40 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-12-15 17:43 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-12-15 18:01 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 10:32 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 10:57 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-12-15 19:48 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-12-15 17:42 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-12-15 12:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth ImperiusDamian <damianblack.wolf@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 16:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-12-15 17:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-12-13 12:29 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 12:46 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-12-13 21:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Robert Spanjaard <spamtrap@arumes.com> - 2016-12-13 22:21 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 13:26 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Robert Spanjaard <spamtrap@arumes.com> - 2016-12-13 22:38 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-12-13 17:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Robert Spanjaard <spamtrap@arumes.com> - 2016-12-13 23:14 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 14:02 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Robert Spanjaard <spamtrap@arumes.com> - 2016-12-13 23:18 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 14:21 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 14:42 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 15:04 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 14:42 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 15:47 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-12-13 18:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Robert Spanjaard <spamtrap@arumes.com> - 2016-12-14 00:04 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 16:18 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 01:33 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Robert Spanjaard <spamtrap@arumes.com> - 2016-12-14 15:51 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 07:18 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-12-14 09:09 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 09:18 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-12-14 17:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 11:28 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 11:36 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 20:22 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth ImperiusDamian <damianblack.wolf@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 16:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 12:09 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 12:17 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 12:41 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 12:46 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 13:17 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 13:32 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 13:43 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 14:29 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 06:17 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 06:44 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-12-13 14:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 11:23 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-12-14 14:31 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-12-14 19:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 11:42 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-12-14 11:59 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-12-14 20:02 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-12-14 19:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-12-15 12:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-12-15 18:30 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-12-03 12:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 21:03 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 05:27 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 21:41 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 06:05 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 22:26 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 07:07 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 23:25 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-04 01:34 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 05:44 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 06:09 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-04 05:52 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 05:55 -0800
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth mathog <dmathog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 11:38 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 12:08 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth mathog <dmathog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 12:33 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-08-31 21:43 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 12:50 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-31 22:01 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 13:31 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-31 22:33 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 13:45 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-31 22:47 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 14:01 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-31 23:06 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth ImperiusDamian <damianblack.wolf@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 15:49 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 14:12 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2016-09-02 21:23 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 14:45 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-03 00:06 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth ImperiusDamian <damianblack.wolf@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 21:51 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-09-02 22:59 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth ImperiusDamian <damianblack.wolf@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 21:54 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-07 20:11 -0500
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-09-07 21:46 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-31 23:05 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 23:12 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-05 17:55 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-05 18:05 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-05 20:23 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-11-06 03:33 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-11-06 10:06 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 02:45 -0800
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-11-06 11:11 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth ImperiusDamian <damianblack.wolf@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 17:52 -0500
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-05 20:30 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 01:59 -0800
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-02 22:41 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 12:53 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-31 22:07 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-08-22 13:59 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-22 11:33 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 16:09 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth mathog <dmathog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-30 18:11 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-30 18:20 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-08-31 16:10 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-09-01 12:32 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 05:04 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2016-09-01 14:14 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-08-31 13:38 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth mathog <dmathog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 11:09 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 11:15 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth mathog <dmathog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 12:20 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 12:32 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 12:35 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth mathog <dmathog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 13:01 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-02 22:31 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-09-03 08:40 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-03 14:27 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-09-03 19:33 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 12:11 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-09-03 12:29 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 12:23 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-09-03 20:23 +0100
Does Keith really know what killfiles are for? (Was: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-09-03 19:43 +0000
Re: Does Keith really know what killfiles are for? Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 21:07 +0100
Re: Does Keith really know what killfiles are for? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-09-03 20:56 +0000
Re: Does Keith really know what killfiles are for? (Was: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-09-03 16:25 -0400
Re: Does Keith really know what killfiles are for? (Was: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-09-03 20:55 +0000
Re: Does Keith really know what killfiles are for? (Was: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-09-03 17:25 -0400
Re: Does Keith really know what killfiles are for? (Was: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 14:42 -0700
Re: Does Keith really know what killfiles are for? (Was: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-09-03 18:15 -0400
Re: Does Keith really know what killfiles are for? (Was: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 15:23 -0700
Re: Does Keith really know what killfiles are for? (Was: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 21:29 -0700
Re: Does Keith really know what killfiles are for? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-09-04 10:37 +0100
Re: Does Keith really know what killfiles are for? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 05:15 -0700
Re: Does Keith really know what killfiles are for? Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-07 11:03 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-09-03 22:19 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-09-03 21:02 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-09-03 22:16 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 21:39 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-09-03 22:56 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 22:16 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-07 10:59 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 05:42 -0500
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-07 10:52 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-09-07 16:06 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2016-09-07 23:35 +0800
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-09-07 17:10 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-09-07 17:36 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-08 12:28 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-09-08 17:43 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Martin Shobe <mashobe9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 18:27 -0500
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 06:35 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-09 09:32 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 16:37 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-10 01:58 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 06:38 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-10 18:09 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 19:33 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-11 13:59 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-09-11 13:16 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Martin Shobe <mashobe9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 19:56 -0500
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 06:24 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-09-07 17:34 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2016-09-07 15:46 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-09-07 17:34 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-08 12:25 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 09:31 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-09-08 17:33 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-13 14:18 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-09-08 21:30 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-09-07 11:55 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 09:57 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-08 12:33 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 09:41 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 17:57 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 10:36 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 19:04 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-09-08 19:58 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 13:06 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-09 09:40 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 06:36 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-09 17:25 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 08:37 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 16:48 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-09 21:17 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 12:40 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 16:00 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 16:15 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-13 15:25 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 12:41 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-09-13 20:02 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-13 14:32 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 11:46 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 19:59 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-19 13:38 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 10:44 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-09-19 18:36 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 12:00 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-24 20:19 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-09-25 00:28 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-24 20:21 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 18:39 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-27 16:44 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 14:00 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-28 11:26 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2016-09-27 21:40 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2016-09-27 17:48 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-28 11:48 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 19:59 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-09-03 22:05 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth mathog <dmathog@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 18:14 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-09-08 02:09 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-07 20:53 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-08 12:38 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 09:44 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 17:58 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-08 19:02 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-08 22:31 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-13 15:35 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 20:00 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-05 21:35 -0700
[OT] DNA as a random number generator? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 16:05 +0800
Re: [OT] DNA as a random number generator? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-11-06 09:55 -0500
Re: [OT] DNA as a random number generator? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 23:01 +0800
Re: [OT] DNA as a random number generator? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-11-06 17:18 -0500
Re: [OT] DNA as a random number generator? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 16:29 +0800
Re: [OT] DNA as a random number generator? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-11-07 09:35 -0500
Re: [OT] DNA as a random number generator? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-07 16:11 +0100
Oil in the ground (Was: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-09-08 19:57 +0000
Re: Oil in the ground (Was: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-08 19:53 -0500
Re: Oil in the ground (Was: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-13 15:37 -0400
Re: Oil in the ground (Was: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-13 13:41 -0700
Re: Oil in the ground (Was: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-09-13 16:46 -0400
Re: Oil in the ground (Was: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-09-13 23:14 +0100
Re: Oil in the ground (Was: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-13 15:19 -0700
Re: Oil in the ground Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 20:02 +0100
Re: Oil in the ground Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-19 13:42 -0400
Re: Oil in the ground Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2016-09-19 21:25 +0200
Re: Oil in the ground Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-09-24 20:22 -0400
Re: Oil in the ground (Was: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-13 15:02 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-07 20:35 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-31 14:20 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth mathog <dmathog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 16:10 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-09-01 12:43 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-09-01 00:16 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-09-01 12:51 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth mathog <dmathog@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 09:35 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 10:00 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-09-01 10:01 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 10:04 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-09-01 17:12 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-09-01 16:25 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-09-01 22:29 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-09-01 16:50 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 13:54 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-09-01 17:14 -0400
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-09-02 00:20 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 16:29 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-01 18:31 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2016-09-02 14:25 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 07:31 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-02 16:42 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 07:54 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-02 17:15 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 08:20 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-02 17:22 +0200
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 08:35 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-02 17:41 +0200
Hodgin's wager (Was: The truth comes out ...) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-09-02 16:17 +0000
Re: Hodgin's wager (Was: The truth comes out ...) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 09:31 -0700
Re: Hodgin's wager (Was: The truth comes out ...) Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2016-09-03 00:42 +0800
Re: Hodgin's wager (Was: The truth comes out ...) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-09-02 17:10 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 16:09 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-09-02 02:34 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 13:30 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Jens Stuckelberger <Jens_Stuckelberger@nowhere.net> - 2016-09-01 22:43 +0000
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 16:29 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth ImperiusDamian <damianblack.wolf@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 22:37 -0400
The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 05:35 -0700
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-06 11:23 +1300
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 17:32 -0500
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-12-13 14:21 -0500
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 11:32 -0800
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-12-14 14:37 -0500
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 12:06 -0800
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Robert Spanjaard <spamtrap@arumes.com> - 2016-12-14 23:17 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 17:57 -0800
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-15 17:34 +1300
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 23:56 -0800
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-12-15 08:15 +0000
Back to on-topic? Maybe? (was Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-12-15 12:17 -0500
Re: Back to on-topic? Maybe? (was Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) ImperiusDamian <damianblack.wolf@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 16:39 -0500
Re: Back to on-topic? Maybe? (was Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-17 17:54 +0100
Re: Back to on-topic? Maybe? (was Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) ImperiusDamian <damianblack.wolf@gmail.com> - 2016-12-18 16:10 -0500
Re: Back to on-topic? Maybe? (was Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-12-18 14:51 -0800
Re: Back to on-topic? Maybe? (was Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-19 09:10 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-19 16:41 +1300
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-18 19:50 -0800
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth Norbert_Paul <norbertpauls_spambin@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-14 21:16 +0100
Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 12:23 -0800
Page 13 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 … 19 Next page →
| From | Martin Shobe <mashobe9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-12 19:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nr7is4$o4m$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #93322 |
On 9/9/2016 12:35 AM, Gareth Owen wrote: > Martin Shobe <mashobe9@gmail.com> writes: > >> It's false in the complex numbers (for example, a = 3, b = 3, c = 3 * >> cuberoot of 2 is a solution to a^3 + b^3 = c^3.) > > They're not complex numbers. They're real numbers - and I think its safe > to say that FLT is not true over the reals.\ Any counter example in the real numbers is also a counter example in the complex numbers. Martin Shobe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-13 06:24 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <87poo8gynm.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #93407 |
Martin Shobe <mashobe9@gmail.com> writes: > On 9/9/2016 12:35 AM, Gareth Owen wrote: >> Martin Shobe <mashobe9@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> It's false in the complex numbers (for example, a = 3, b = 3, c = 3 * >>> cuberoot of 2 is a solution to a^3 + b^3 = c^3.) >> >> They're not complex numbers. They're real numbers - and I think its safe >> to say that FLT is not true over the reals.\ > > Any counter example in the real numbers is also a counter example in > the complex numbers. I understood that (correctly) that when writing "complex numbers" in this context the author meant "Gaussian integers"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-07 17:34 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nqpfho$8ia$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #93273 |
On 07/09/16 16:35, Reinhardt Behm wrote:
> AT Wednesday 07 September 2016 23:06, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>
>> On 07/09/16 15:52, Ken Brody wrote:
>>> On 9/3/2016 2:33 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>>> On 03/09/16 19:27, Ken Brody wrote:
>>>>> On 9/3/2016 3:40 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>>>>> On 03/09/16 03:31, Ken Brody wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>> "The truth comes out -- Fossil proves evolution is a reality"
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>> Prove, Ken? /Prove? Really /prove/?
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>> I was just using the same wording as the subject of the original post.
>>>>
>>>> Understood. But by quoting it, you imply (or at least you lead other
>>>> people
>>>> to infer) that you agree with it unless you expressly state otherwise.
>>>
>>> My intent was to mock it.
>>>
>>> Yes, in science, an single (repeatable) test result can disprove a
>>> theory. (Or, at least, show that it's incomplete.) But the existence of
>>> DNA certainly doesn't qualify of evidence against evolution.
>>>
>>>> There is no such thing as "proof" in science.
>>>
>>> Well, it's been proven that there are no integral solutions to
>>> a^3+b^3=c^3.
>>
>> This, at least, can be made at least semi-topical.
>>
>> #include <stdio.h>
>>
>> int main(void)
>> {
>> unsigned long solutions = 0;
>> int a = -10;
>> do
>> {
>> int b = -10;
>> do
>> {
>> int c = -10;
>> do
>> {
>> if(a * a * a + b * b * b == c * c * c)
>> {
>> printf("Solution no %lu: %d, %d, %d\n",
>> ++solutions, a, b, c);
>> }
>> } while(c++ < 10);
>> } while(b++ < 10);
>> } while(a++ < 10);
>> printf("Ken is %s.\n", solutions > 0 ? "wrong" : "right");
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> Using the above program, I found 61 counter-examples to your claim. So
>> much for "proof".
>
> Integral solutions means no negative numbers.
Well, I took "integral solution" to mean "solution using integers".
Still, even with that tighter constraint, I still get 21 solutions.
> Fermat's last theorem has been proven.
Yes, but Fermat's last theorem is rather better defined than Ken's
little problem.
> It holds not only for exponents of of
> 3 but for all exponents bigger than 2.
>
> So show us at least one.
a = 0
b = 0
c = 0
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-07 15:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn3vfsnt0dii.ren.ike@iceland.freeshell.org> |
| In reply to | #93271 |
On 2016-09-07, Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wrote: > On 07/09/16 15:52, Ken Brody wrote: >> On 9/3/2016 2:33 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote: >>> On 03/09/16 19:27, Ken Brody wrote: >>>> On 9/3/2016 3:40 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote: >>>>> On 03/09/16 03:31, Ken Brody wrote: >>>> [...] >>>>>> "The truth comes out -- Fossil proves evolution is a reality" >>>> [...] >>>>> Prove, Ken? /Prove? Really /prove/? >>>> [...] >>>> >>>> I was just using the same wording as the subject of the original post. >>> >>> Understood. But by quoting it, you imply (or at least you lead other >>> people >>> to infer) that you agree with it unless you expressly state otherwise. >> >> My intent was to mock it. >> >> Yes, in science, an single (repeatable) test result can disprove a >> theory. (Or, at least, show that it's incomplete.) But the existence of >> DNA certainly doesn't qualify of evidence against evolution. >> >>> There is no such thing as "proof" in science. >> >> Well, it's been proven that there are no integral solutions to a^3+b^3=c^3. > > [snip code] > > Using the above program, I found 61 counter-examples to your claim. So > much for "proof". How many counterexamples can you find for positive integers a, b and c?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-07 17:34 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nqpfin$8ia$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #93274 |
On 07/09/16 16:46, Ike Naar wrote: > On 2016-09-07, Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wrote: >> On 07/09/16 15:52, Ken Brody wrote: >>> On 9/3/2016 2:33 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote: >>>> On 03/09/16 19:27, Ken Brody wrote: >>>>> On 9/3/2016 3:40 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote: >>>>>> On 03/09/16 03:31, Ken Brody wrote: >>>>> [...] >>>>>>> "The truth comes out -- Fossil proves evolution is a reality" >>>>> [...] >>>>>> Prove, Ken? /Prove? Really /prove/? >>>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>> I was just using the same wording as the subject of the original post. >>>> >>>> Understood. But by quoting it, you imply (or at least you lead other >>>> people >>>> to infer) that you agree with it unless you expressly state otherwise. >>> >>> My intent was to mock it. >>> >>> Yes, in science, an single (repeatable) test result can disprove a >>> theory. (Or, at least, show that it's incomplete.) But the existence of >>> DNA certainly doesn't qualify of evidence against evolution. >>> >>>> There is no such thing as "proof" in science. >>> >>> Well, it's been proven that there are no integral solutions to a^3+b^3=c^3. >> >> [snip code] >> >> Using the above program, I found 61 counter-examples to your claim. So >> much for "proof". > > How many counterexamples can you find for positive integers a, b and c? Fewer. ;-) -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-08 12:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nqs3d6$d74$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #93271 |
On 9/7/2016 11:06 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
> On 07/09/16 15:52, Ken Brody wrote:
[...]
>> Well, it's been proven that there are no integral solutions to a^3+b^3=c^3.
>
> This, at least, can be made at least semi-topical.
>
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> int main(void)
> {
> unsigned long solutions = 0;
> int a = -10;
> do
> {
> int b = -10;
> do
> {
> int c = -10;
> do
> {
> if(a * a * a + b * b * b == c * c * c)
> {
> printf("Solution no %lu: %d, %d, %d\n",
> ++solutions, a, b, c);
> }
> } while(c++ < 10);
> } while(b++ < 10);
> } while(a++ < 10);
> printf("Ken is %s.\n", solutions > 0 ? "wrong" : "right");
> return 0;
> }
>
> Using the above program, I found 61 counter-examples to your claim. So much
> for "proof".
Given the CLC context, I probably should have clarified "positive, non-zero,
integer solutions".
--
Kenneth Brody
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-08 09:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <14ecd6ef-9e75-455e-a5ee-d89f917134df@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #93299 |
On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 12:25:21 PM UTC-4, Ken Brody wrote: > Given the CLC context, I probably should have clarified "positive, non-zero, > integer solutions". LOL! Best regards, Rick C. Hodgin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-08 17:33 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nqs3t6$fe8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #93299 |
On 08/09/16 17:25, Ken Brody wrote: > On 9/7/2016 11:06 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote: <snip> >> Using the above program, I found 61 counter-examples to your claim. So >> much >> for "proof". > > Given the CLC context, I probably should have clarified "positive, > non-zero, integer solutions". Sorry, Ken, but yeah, we're a picky crowd (although, given "positive", I'd have let you off "non-zero", since 0 isn't positive). -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-13 14:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nr9fu6$7qu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #93302 |
On 9/8/2016 12:33 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote: > On 08/09/16 17:25, Ken Brody wrote: >> On 9/7/2016 11:06 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote: > > <snip> > >>> Using the above program, I found 61 counter-examples to your claim. So >>> much for "proof". >> >> Given the CLC context, I probably should have clarified "positive, >> non-zero, integer solutions". > > Sorry, Ken, but yeah, we're a picky crowd (although, given "positive", I'd > have let you off "non-zero", since 0 isn't positive). :-) But, if one can have "negative zero", doesn't that imply that there must be a "positive zero"? Regardless, I was being over-specific to make sure I didn't leave any loophole. (At least, I hope I didn't.) -- Kenneth Brody
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-08 21:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <87pooeuobs.fsf@bsb.me.uk> |
| In reply to | #93299 |
Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> writes:
> On 9/7/2016 11:06 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> On 07/09/16 15:52, Ken Brody wrote:
> [...]
>>> Well, it's been proven that there are no integral solutions to a^3+b^3=c^3.
>>
>> This, at least, can be made at least semi-topical.
>>
>> #include <stdio.h>
>>
>> int main(void)
>> {
>> unsigned long solutions = 0;
>> int a = -10;
>> do
>> {
>> int b = -10;
>> do
>> {
>> int c = -10;
>> do
>> {
>> if(a * a * a + b * b * b == c * c * c)
>> {
>> printf("Solution no %lu: %d, %d, %d\n",
>> ++solutions, a, b, c);
>> }
>> } while(c++ < 10);
>> } while(b++ < 10);
>> } while(a++ < 10);
>> printf("Ken is %s.\n", solutions > 0 ? "wrong" : "right");
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> Using the above program, I found 61 counter-examples to your claim. So much
>> for "proof".
>
> Given the CLC context, I probably should have clarified "positive,
> non-zero, integer solutions".
Richard points out you don't need to say "non-zero" if you say
"positive", but I think it's better to drop the positive and keep the
non-zero. You get the most general form of the theorem is you just say
there are no non-zero integer solutions (in the sense that none of a, b
or c can be zero).
--
Ben.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-07 11:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <20b4c0c4-5361-5513-904b-556c848ec81f@verizon.net> |
| In reply to | #93267 |
On 09/07/2016 10:52 AM, Ken Brody wrote: > On 9/3/2016 2:33 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote: ... >> There is no such thing as "proof" in science. > > Well, it's been proven that there are no integral solutions to a^3+b^3=c^3. That's math, not science. Science makes heavy use of math, but that doesn't make math a science. The scientific method is all about performing experiments to determine whether reality conforms to your theories - but mathematicians don't care about whether they match. You could do all kinds of tests to check whether Euclidean geometry accurately describe the way space works in the real world - and if all those tests came up negative, mathematicians would still be interested in Euclidean geometry (Euclidean geometry is actually NOT a perfectly accurate model for the way space works - but it's a very accurate approximation except in strong gravitational fields). In contrast, the only reason why physicists are interested in Newtonian mechanics is because it appears to be an extremely accurate approximation to certain aspects of reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-07 09:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <685df9bc-7806-460a-b89e-19aa57f0badb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #93267 |
Ken Brody wrote: > But the existence of DNA certainly doesn't qualify of evidence > against evolution. Ken, it's not the existence of DNA. It's the information, organization, required editing, utter complexity, packaging, and dual-use sequences that disprove evolution. It is not only designed, but designed by the master of masters. Best regards, Rick C. Hodgin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-08 12:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nqs3tf$d74$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #93280 |
On 9/7/2016 12:57 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > Ken Brody wrote: >> But the existence of DNA certainly doesn't qualify of evidence >> against evolution. > > Ken, it's not the existence of DNA. It's the information, organization, > required editing, utter complexity, packaging, and dual-use sequences > that disprove evolution. It is not only designed, but designed by the > master of masters. None of those things require a designer. And, let's assume that someone did "design" the very first creature using DNA. Nothing requires that the DNA must have been designed in its current state, and couldn't have evolved into what we see today. -- Kenneth Brody
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-08 09:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ceb5eb5b-0936-4f26-b4a3-111223af3b21@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #93303 |
On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 12:34:00 PM UTC-4, Ken Brody wrote: > On 9/7/2016 12:57 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > > Ken Brody wrote: > >> But the existence of DNA certainly doesn't qualify of evidence > >> against evolution. > > > > Ken, it's not the existence of DNA. It's the information, organization, > > required editing, utter complexity, packaging, and dual-use sequences > > that disprove evolution. It is not only designed, but designed by the > > master of masters. > > None of those things require a designer. > > And, let's assume that someone did "design" the very first creature using > DNA. Nothing requires that the DNA must have been designed in its current > state, and couldn't have evolved into what we see today. It does. Information systems do not arise from non-living processes. It requires a mind to create a complex information systems. And the true nature of the complexity found in DNA in the past five years ... it absolutely and completely boggles the mind. We were created by a designer. And the master of masters in design at that. When you read the Bible and learn about Jesus Christ, you learn who that designer is, and what other qualities He possesses. As masterful as He is at designing this universe and everything in it, and all of the life, and each and every last one of us, there is far more than that in His repertoire. And He wants to show us all of it. And He will, to all who do not reject Him for who He is. Best regards, Rick C. Hodgin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-08 17:57 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <87zinicot1.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #93305 |
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> writes: > > It does. Information systems do not arise from non-living processes. > It requires a mind to create a complex information systems. And the > true nature of the complexity found in DNA in the past five years ... > it absolutely and completely boggles the mind. One must deduce then, that the infinite omnipotence of God requires for Him also to have a creator. If DNA is sufficiently complex, surely a diety must also be? Just out of interest, what's the current bullshit argument to refute that observation?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-08 10:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <95bee08c-77d6-4c25-9493-5982a4b2b481@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #93308 |
On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 12:57:26 PM UTC-4, gwowen wrote:
> [snip]
gwowen, I added an email filter to send all of your posts to the trash
folder some time ago. I still see your posts on Google Groups, however.
I read this one before I realized it was from you. I see in it that you
asked me a question, so I am replying to this post to tell you that I do
not read your posts, will not read your posts or emails, and will not be
replying to any of them.
You have demonstrated repeatedly that you have no interest in the truth,
that you are purposed on mocking everything related to Jesus Christ and
the Bible, and as such I now leave you to go your own way (since that is
the path you are intent on).
I offer you the final warning any Christian on this Earth can offer up
to a non-believer:
Unless you repent, I'll take my leave of you now and simply say:
"See you briefly (http://biblehub.com/kjv/revelation/20-12.htm)
on that final day." (http://biblehub.com/kjv/revelation/20-15.htm)
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-08 19:04 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <87k2eme09y.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #93311 |
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> writes: > On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 12:57:26 PM UTC-4, gwowen wrote: >> [snip] > > gwowen, I added an email filter to send all of your posts to the trash > folder some time ago Good. Bye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-08 19:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nqsftu$7ch$2@news.xmission.com> |
| In reply to | #93311 |
In article <95bee08c-77d6-4c25-9493-5982a4b2b481@googlegroups.com>, Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote: >On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 12:57:26 PM UTC-4, gwowen wrote: >> [snip] > >gwowen, I added an email filter to send all of your posts to the trash >folder some time ago. I still see your posts on Google Groups, however. Oh boy!! Oh Goodie! Can I get in there too? I'm sure there will be a stampede of CLC members lining up for a space in your kill file. -- The randomly chosen signature file that would have appeared here is more than 4 lines long. As such, it violates one or more Usenet RFCs. In order to remain in compliance with said RFCs, the actual sig can be found at the following web address: http://www.xmission.com/~gazelle/Sigs/DanQuayle
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-08 13:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <51a5787a-5921-4de3-b504-428b9a54cd92@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #93315 |
On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 3:59:01 PM UTC-4, Kenny McCormack wrote: > In article <95bee08c-77d6-4c25-9493-5982a4b2b481@googlegroups.com>, > Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote: > >gwowen, I added an email filter to send all of your posts to the trash > >folder some time ago. I still see your posts on Google Groups, however. > > Oh boy!! Oh Goodie! > Can I get in there too? > > I'm sure there will be a stampede of CLC members lining up for a space in > your kill file. There's still hope for everyone else. Even you, Kenny. :-) And of course there's still hope for gwowen as well ... it's just an extremely hard heart there. We all have hope for salvation ... at least until the day we die. On that day, our fate is eternally sealed, which is why it's so important to seek forgiveness from Jesus Christ today. Here on this Earth, we are not promised tomorrow. Best regards, Rick C. Hodgin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-09 09:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nqtp1h$ep6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #93305 |
On 08/09/16 18:41, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > > Information systems do not arise from non-living processes. Where is your proof or justification for that? (And don't just say "the Bible", because that is circular reasoning.) When you start out by making concrete, absolute assumptions, you can derive lots of new ideas. But they are not "true" in any real sense unless the assumptions are true. And here you have a key assumption upon which your entire argument rests. Unfortunately for you, it is clearly /not/ true. Anyone who has looked at a snowflake, or been fascinated by patterns in the tides or the stars, knows it is not true. It is conceivable that the assumption could be re-worded to talk about information systems of a certain complexity, or with certain features, cannot arise from non-living processes. But that would still be an assumption with no justification, evidence, or proof. (And I belief it is incorrect - though I offer no proof of that claim either.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 13 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c
csiph-web