Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #403612 > unrolled thread
| Started by | fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-10-27 11:53 +0100 |
| Last post | 2026-10-31 21:23 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 on this page of 143 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c
.5 against 0.5f fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-10-27 11:53 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> - 2026-10-27 17:45 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-10-27 18:50 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> - 2026-10-27 19:01 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-10-27 20:15 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> - 2026-10-27 19:54 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-10-27 13:10 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f steve g <Sgonedes1977@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 02:20 -0400
Re: .5 against 0.5f David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-10-27 21:35 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-10-27 18:00 -0400
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> - 2026-10-27 22:15 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-10-28 06:54 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-10-27 21:57 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-10-27 14:18 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f steve g <Sgonedes1977@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 02:19 -0400
Re: .5 against 0.5f Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-10-28 21:54 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 14:58 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f steve g <Sgonedes1977@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 02:11 -0400
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-27 23:21 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-10-27 18:40 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-10-27 12:29 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-10-27 13:11 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-10-27 13:25 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-10-27 21:43 +0200
Re: .5 against 0.5f Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-10-27 22:05 +0200
Re: .5 against 0.5f Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-10-27 22:51 +0200
Re: .5 against 0.5f Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2026-10-27 20:05 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-10-27 21:03 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-27 15:41 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-10-28 16:23 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f steve g <Sgonedes1977@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 02:25 -0400
Re: .5 against 0.5f makendo <makendo@makendo.invalid> - 2026-10-29 18:04 +0800
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-29 05:01 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-10-29 13:55 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-10-29 14:32 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-10-29 23:19 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-10-30 00:50 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-10-30 05:01 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2026-10-30 02:39 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-10-30 11:06 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-10-30 11:12 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-10-30 14:07 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-10-30 13:55 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2026-10-30 07:45 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-29 21:17 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2026-10-27 19:58 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-10-27 17:43 -0400
Re: .5 against 0.5f James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-10-27 18:06 -0400
Re: .5 against 0.5f Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-10-28 00:49 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-27 18:23 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-10-28 16:38 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 13:27 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-10-29 00:08 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 16:56 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-10-29 18:55 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-10-29 09:30 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-29 04:54 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-10-29 19:57 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-10-29 20:56 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-10-29 23:06 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-10-29 13:39 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-29 16:56 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-10-30 04:38 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-10-30 09:11 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-10-30 14:54 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-10-30 15:25 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-10-30 14:45 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-30 12:02 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-10-30 21:01 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-10-27 21:41 -0400
Re: .5 against 0.5f David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-10-28 08:45 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> - 2026-10-28 01:50 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 07:32 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 07:51 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 07:55 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> - 2026-10-28 16:27 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-10-28 17:44 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> - 2026-10-28 16:22 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 19:15 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 19:47 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> - 2026-10-28 19:10 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 13:31 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> - 2026-10-28 22:44 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-10-29 00:27 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 16:39 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> - 2026-10-29 00:22 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-10-28 17:59 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> - 2026-10-29 01:50 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-10-29 10:45 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-10-29 14:56 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> - 2026-10-29 16:34 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-10-29 15:47 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-10-30 01:17 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-29 16:46 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-10-29 11:56 -0400
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> - 2026-10-29 17:57 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-29 16:06 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> - 2026-10-30 00:21 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-10-29 19:49 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-10-29 22:55 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-29 16:29 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-10-30 03:57 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-29 20:53 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-10-30 05:06 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-10-30 09:33 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-10-30 10:58 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-10-29 23:46 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-10-29 18:37 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-10-30 04:22 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-10-29 17:58 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-10-29 15:42 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-10-30 01:27 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> - 2026-10-30 02:08 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-29 19:37 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-10-28 08:39 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-10-28 22:25 +0200
Re: .5 against 0.5f David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-10-29 10:48 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-29 04:59 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-10-31 12:18 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 14:26 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-10-29 00:12 +0200
Re: .5 against 0.5f bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-10-28 22:33 +0000
Re: .5 against 0.5f David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-10-29 11:01 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 16:05 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-10-30 11:58 +0200
Re: .5 against 0.5f David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-10-29 10:59 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 14:34 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-10-29 11:06 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f tTh <tth@none.invalid> - 2026-10-28 15:08 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-10-28 07:49 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 14:36 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-27 15:53 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-10-27 21:55 -0400
Re: .5 against 0.5f Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-10-27 19:02 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-10-28 08:56 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-10-28 08:01 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-10-27 13:08 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2026-10-30 22:00 -0500
Re: .5 against 0.5f Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2026-10-30 22:01 -0500
Re: .5 against 0.5f Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-10-31 02:16 -0400
Re: .5 against 0.5f fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-10-31 08:30 +0100
Re: .5 against 0.5f "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-10-31 13:16 -0700
Re: .5 against 0.5f fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-10-31 21:23 +0100
Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]
| From | fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-31 08:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <11c45eq$tmid$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #403860 |
Paul pisze: > On Fri, 10/30/2026 11:01 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote: >> On 10/30/2026 10:00 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote: >>> On 10/27/2026 5:53 AM, fir wrote: >>>> if ai generates me some functions it puts everywhere this f at the and >>>> yet it add zeros so instead of .1 i got 0.1f >>>> >>>> and i obviously dont like it >>>> >>>> i write hvever some codes when i need speed so the question is may it give some difference? >>>> >>>> i mean .1 maybe can be treated as doube constants so mabe occupies some more memory (?) or uses some casting in coplutations (?) >>>> >>>> >>>> i doubt it probably it makes difference but im strictly not sure >>> >>> Never give up precision easily. It will always come back to bite you. >>> >>> Lynn >> >> Tell the AI to stop the nonsense. >> >> Lynn >> > > You can do that. The trick to being a vibe coder, > is knowing what to put in the prompt. > > And this is why, even if you have "negative interest" in LLM-AI, > you should at least do enough experiments to detect their dimensionality > (their linear thinking when used in isolation and without > a harness). > > There is a big big difference, between what Fir is doing, > and what professionals right now are doing. > > [Teaser] > > https://www.theregister.com/devops/2026/09/18/microsoft-agentically-ports-copilot-runtime-to-rust-for-120k/5297549 > > [Details] > > https://github.blog/ai-and-ml/generative-ai/migrating-the-github-copilot-runtime-to-rust-using-copilot/ > > On the one hand, the $120,000 worth of tokens, seems expensive. But > on the other hand, the staff it would have taken to do the equivalent > would not have been free. > > Even an expert, he still made a mistake in corralling the machines > and preventing them from "cheating". The non-determinism means > you can never stop learning about what guard statements to add. > > The code review is still the bottleneck, and lots of operations outside > of Microsoft, do not see the gains of the "all-in" "experimental" > approach shown in the above. > > Even if you're not interested in such things, you have to track > the capabilities, to understand how your ass is going to get kicked. > For example, you may have a superior product to the upstarts vibe-coding > an equivalent. But now you are going to have to do extra marketing > to ensure your existing customers "do not run away". > > The getcraft site has been making (what it claims are) equivalents > to commercial applications like the Adobe suite and Microsoft Office. > By no means are these equivalent, not even close. But what the > existence of these things do, is they lead to customers "testing > all sorts of shit" and diluting a lot of careful work you might > have done to get where you are. I tested a couple of those getcraft in > a VM, and there was "excessive CPU usage". The engine is Electron > (for cross-platform usage). > > Paul > i wouldnt say i do vibe coding..i do normal coding wit a help of ai assistant..vibe coding may be something different than i do
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-31 13:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <11c5ibb$1dqbi$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #403861 |
On 10/31/2026 12:30 AM, fir wrote: > Paul pisze: >> On Fri, 10/30/2026 11:01 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote: >>> On 10/30/2026 10:00 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote: >>>> On 10/27/2026 5:53 AM, fir wrote: >>>>> if ai generates me some functions it puts everywhere this f at the and >>>>> yet it add zeros so instead of .1 i got 0.1f >>>>> >>>>> and i obviously dont like it >>>>> >>>>> i write hvever some codes when i need speed so the question is may >>>>> it give some difference? >>>>> >>>>> i mean .1 maybe can be treated as doube constants so mabe occupies >>>>> some more memory (?) or uses some casting in coplutations (?) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> i doubt it probably it makes difference but im strictly not sure >>>> >>>> Never give up precision easily. It will always come back to bite you. >>>> >>>> Lynn >>> >>> Tell the AI to stop the nonsense. >>> >>> Lynn >>> >> >> You can do that. The trick to being a vibe coder, >> is knowing what to put in the prompt. >> >> And this is why, even if you have "negative interest" in LLM-AI, >> you should at least do enough experiments to detect their dimensionality >> (their linear thinking when used in isolation and without >> a harness). >> >> There is a big big difference, between what Fir is doing, >> and what professionals right now are doing. >> >> [Teaser] >> >> https://www.theregister.com/devops/2026/09/18/microsoft- >> agentically-ports-copilot-runtime-to-rust-for-120k/5297549 >> >> [Details] >> >> https://github.blog/ai-and-ml/generative-ai/migrating-the-github- >> copilot-runtime-to-rust-using-copilot/ >> >> On the one hand, the $120,000 worth of tokens, seems expensive. But >> on the other hand, the staff it would have taken to do the equivalent >> would not have been free. >> >> Even an expert, he still made a mistake in corralling the machines >> and preventing them from "cheating". The non-determinism means >> you can never stop learning about what guard statements to add. >> >> The code review is still the bottleneck, and lots of operations outside >> of Microsoft, do not see the gains of the "all-in" "experimental" >> approach shown in the above. >> >> Even if you're not interested in such things, you have to track >> the capabilities, to understand how your ass is going to get kicked. >> For example, you may have a superior product to the upstarts vibe-coding >> an equivalent. But now you are going to have to do extra marketing >> to ensure your existing customers "do not run away". >> >> The getcraft site has been making (what it claims are) equivalents >> to commercial applications like the Adobe suite and Microsoft Office. >> By no means are these equivalent, not even close. But what the >> existence of these things do, is they lead to customers "testing >> all sorts of shit" and diluting a lot of careful work you might >> have done to get where you are. I tested a couple of those getcraft in >> a VM, and there was "excessive CPU usage". The engine is Electron >> (for cross-platform usage). >> >> Paul >> > i wouldnt say i do vibe coding..i do normal coding wit a help of ai > assistant..vibe coding may be something different than i do At least you don't let do all of your coding.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-31 21:23 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <11c5io4$1e6gi$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #403895 |
Chris M. Thomasson pisze: > On 10/31/2026 12:30 AM, fir wrote: >> Paul pisze: >>> On Fri, 10/30/2026 11:01 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote: >>>> On 10/30/2026 10:00 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote: >>>>> On 10/27/2026 5:53 AM, fir wrote: >>>>>> if ai generates me some functions it puts everywhere this f at the >>>>>> and >>>>>> yet it add zeros so instead of .1 i got 0.1f >>>>>> >>>>>> and i obviously dont like it >>>>>> >>>>>> i write hvever some codes when i need speed so the question is may >>>>>> it give some difference? >>>>>> >>>>>> i mean .1 maybe can be treated as doube constants so mabe occupies >>>>>> some more memory (?) or uses some casting in coplutations (?) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> i doubt it probably it makes difference but im strictly not sure >>>>> >>>>> Never give up precision easily. It will always come back to bite you. >>>>> >>>>> Lynn >>>> >>>> Tell the AI to stop the nonsense. >>>> >>>> Lynn >>>> >>> >>> You can do that. The trick to being a vibe coder, >>> is knowing what to put in the prompt. >>> >>> And this is why, even if you have "negative interest" in LLM-AI, >>> you should at least do enough experiments to detect their dimensionality >>> (their linear thinking when used in isolation and without >>> a harness). >>> >>> There is a big big difference, between what Fir is doing, >>> and what professionals right now are doing. >>> >>> [Teaser] >>> >>> https://www.theregister.com/devops/2026/09/18/microsoft- >>> agentically-ports-copilot-runtime-to-rust-for-120k/5297549 >>> >>> [Details] >>> >>> https://github.blog/ai-and-ml/generative-ai/migrating-the-github- >>> copilot-runtime-to-rust-using-copilot/ >>> >>> On the one hand, the $120,000 worth of tokens, seems expensive. But >>> on the other hand, the staff it would have taken to do the equivalent >>> would not have been free. >>> >>> Even an expert, he still made a mistake in corralling the machines >>> and preventing them from "cheating". The non-determinism means >>> you can never stop learning about what guard statements to add. >>> >>> The code review is still the bottleneck, and lots of operations outside >>> of Microsoft, do not see the gains of the "all-in" "experimental" >>> approach shown in the above. >>> >>> Even if you're not interested in such things, you have to track >>> the capabilities, to understand how your ass is going to get kicked. >>> For example, you may have a superior product to the upstarts vibe-coding >>> an equivalent. But now you are going to have to do extra marketing >>> to ensure your existing customers "do not run away". >>> >>> The getcraft site has been making (what it claims are) equivalents >>> to commercial applications like the Adobe suite and Microsoft Office. >>> By no means are these equivalent, not even close. But what the >>> existence of these things do, is they lead to customers "testing >>> all sorts of shit" and diluting a lot of careful work you might >>> have done to get where you are. I tested a couple of those getcraft in >>> a VM, and there was "excessive CPU usage". The engine is Electron >>> (for cross-platform usage). >>> >>> Paul >>> >> i wouldnt say i do vibe coding..i do normal coding wit a help of ai >> assistant..vibe coding may be something different than i do > > At least you don't let do all of your coding. this free model i use wouldnt be able to do that i think though sometimes i make an error giving it 20 small task instead of saying "do all that task"..im afraid of uveruse it..but its not good becouse of it i sometimes still dwell in boring editing work it is all very interesting thought, its really interesting 'adventure'
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c
csiph-web