Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #66125 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-21 21:21 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-09-03 22:33 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 153 — 26 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c
Generic function-calling code Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-21 21:21 +0100
Re: Generic function-calling code jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-07-21 23:04 +0200
Re: Generic function-calling code luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2015-07-21 14:45 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-22 00:56 +0100
Re: Generic function-calling code BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-22 00:25 -0500
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 02:37 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-22 11:50 +0100
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 04:29 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-22 13:04 +0100
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 05:44 -0700
AVCALL (from the 'ffcall' package) really is the answer! (Was: Generic function-calling code) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-07-22 12:50 +0000
Re: AVCALL (from the 'ffcall' package) really is the answer! (Was: Generic function-calling code) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 06:07 -0700
Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-07-22 13:30 +0000
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 07:42 -0700
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-07-22 17:07 +0200
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 08:16 -0700
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-22 08:41 -0700
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-22 08:47 -0700
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 08:53 -0700
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-07-22 18:09 +0200
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 16:38 -0700
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-22 18:28 +0100
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-22 13:37 -0400
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-22 15:04 -0500
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 10:39 -0700
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-22 19:10 +0100
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 11:39 -0700
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-22 20:01 +0100
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 12:06 -0700
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-22 20:51 +0100
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) guinness.tony@gmail.com - 2015-07-22 17:48 -0700
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-07-22 19:50 +0000
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 13:15 -0700
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-22 21:28 +0100
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 21:44 +0100
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) Morris Dovey <mrdovey@iedu.com> - 2015-07-22 16:35 -0500
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 15:17 -0700
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) Morris Dovey <mrdovey@iedu.com> - 2015-09-05 15:20 -0500
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 23:01 -0700
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) wssimms@gmail.com - 2015-09-06 01:58 -0700
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 02:28 -0700
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-09-06 12:48 -0700
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 07:08 -0700
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-22 13:50 -0700
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 21:43 +0100
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic guinness.tony@gmail.com - 2015-07-22 17:43 -0700
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-24 10:41 -0400
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-24 16:01 +0100
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-07-25 19:20 +0000
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 20:25 +0100
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2015-07-23 20:41 +0200
Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 12:00 -0700
Re: AVCALL (from the 'ffcall' package) really is the answer! (Was: Generic function-calling code) Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-22 17:43 +0100
Re: AVCALL (from the 'ffcall' package) really is the answer! (Was: Generic function-calling code) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-07-22 19:36 +0000
Re: AVCALL (from the 'ffcall' package) really is the answer! (Was: Generic function-calling code) Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-22 23:19 +0100
Re: AVCALL (from the 'ffcall' package) really is the answer! (Was: Generic function-calling code) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 15:43 -0700
Re: AVCALL (from the 'ffcall' package) really is the answer! (Was: Generic function-calling code) Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-22 23:47 +0100
Re: AVCALL (from the 'ffcall' package) really is the answer! (Was: Generic function-calling code) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 04:44 -0700
Re: AVCALL (from the 'ffcall' package) really is the answer! (Was: Generic function-calling code) Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-23 13:14 +0100
Re: AVCALL (from the 'ffcall' package) really is the answer! (Was: Generic function-calling code) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 06:26 -0700
Re: AVCALL (from the 'ffcall' package) really is the answer! (Was: Generic function-calling code) Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-23 15:00 +0100
Re: AVCALL (from the 'ffcall' package) really is the answer! (Was: Generic function-calling code) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 07:13 -0700
Re: AVCALL (from the 'ffcall' package) really is the answer! (Was: Generic function-calling code) Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-23 18:02 +0100
Re: AVCALL (from the 'ffcall' package) really is the answer! (Was: Generic function-calling code) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 10:05 -0700
Re: AVCALL (from the 'ffcall' package) really is the answer! (Was: Generic function-calling code) Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-23 18:19 +0100
Re: AVCALL (from the 'ffcall' package) really is the answer! (Was: Generic function-calling code) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 10:37 -0700
Re: AVCALL (from the 'ffcall' package) really is the answer! (Was: Generic function-calling code) Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-23 23:29 +0100
Re: AVCALL (from the 'ffcall' package) really is the answer! (Was: Generic function-calling code) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-07-23 16:18 +0000
Re: Generic function-calling code Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-07-24 01:21 -0400
Re: Generic function-calling code Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-22 13:23 +0100
Re: Generic function-calling code Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-23 07:44 +1200
Re: Generic function-calling code Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-22 22:24 +0100
Re: Generic function-calling code luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 10:29 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 10:32 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-21 15:38 -0700
Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-21 17:26 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-22 14:27 +1200
Re: Generic function-calling code gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-07-22 02:39 +0000
Re: Generic function-calling code Lőrinczy Zsigmond <zsiga@nospam.for.me> - 2015-07-23 09:28 +0200
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 19:04 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code owen.jacobson@grimoire.ca - 2015-07-24 08:32 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-07-24 18:48 +0000
Re: Generic function-calling code Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-24 20:22 +0100
Re: Generic function-calling code Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-25 03:03 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 13:32 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-25 23:28 +0100
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 06:18 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-07-26 13:39 +0000
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 07:33 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-26 16:21 +0100
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 08:39 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 05:37 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-08-26 14:36 +0100
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 06:46 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-08-26 16:11 +0100
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 08:20 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 16:53 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-08-28 01:03 +0100
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:36 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 06:35 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 06:43 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-08-30 15:10 +0100
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:59 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-30 10:54 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 10:57 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-30 11:13 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 11:16 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-30 11:59 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 12:15 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-30 12:57 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 13:40 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-30 11:15 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 11:28 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-08-30 20:11 +0100
Re: Generic function-calling code David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-08-30 22:28 +0200
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 01:13 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-09-03 00:40 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 01:26 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-09-03 11:34 +0200
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 03:15 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 03:21 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-09-03 13:07 +0200
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 04:30 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-09-03 13:39 +0200
Re: Generic function-calling code Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-03 07:20 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-09-03 20:25 +0200
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 11:30 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 11:44 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-09-03 11:21 +0100
Re: Generic function-calling code David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-09-03 13:19 +0200
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 04:51 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-09-03 14:31 +0200
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 05:57 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 04:56 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-09-03 14:53 +0200
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 06:08 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-09-03 15:18 +0200
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 06:30 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-03 10:09 -0500
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 08:59 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-09-03 08:37 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-09-03 08:31 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 09:07 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-09-03 20:42 +0200
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 11:49 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-09-03 08:25 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-09-03 16:46 +0100
Re: Generic function-calling code "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 09:02 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-09-04 04:04 +0000
Re: Generic function-calling code Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-09-03 00:36 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-09-03 16:29 +0100
Re: Generic function-calling code Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-09-03 08:45 -0700
Re: Generic function-calling code David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-09-03 22:33 +0200
Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 16:38 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) |
| Message-ID | <38197be6-c262-411e-9062-ff6b745b1572@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #66165 |
On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 8:41:15 AM UTC-7, Keith Thompson wrote: > In the past, Rick has posted a private e-mail discussion here > without the other participant's permission, so be aware of that > (he later apologized). I didn't detect any apology. But please don't anyone reply to that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 18:28 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) |
| Message-ID | <moojpv$au9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #66160 |
On 22/07/15 16:07, David Brown wrote: > On 22/07/15 16:42, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: >> On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 9:30:14 AM UTC-4, Kenny McCormack wrote: >>> Rick C. Hodgin wrote: >>>> [snip] >>> I'm not sure what's more off-topic here. Talking about (American) >>> politics or your endless God-drivel. >> >> Talking about politics. Discussions about Jesus Christ are appropriate >> in all places, at all times, in all situations, as "man does not live by >> bread alone, but by EVERY word which proceeds from the mouth of God." >> > > My understanding was that the Bible encouraged people to show their > faith through their deeds, not just words. That's what he thinks he's doing, and he's not interested in your point of view. He wants this newsgroup to become a religious debating ground for Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Judaists, Atheists, and all the rest of them, and to hell with the topic. Presumably he doesn't harangue customers at his local shops with religious diatribes every time he pops out for half a pound of carrots or a bottle of wine, or get thrown out of libraries for soap-boxing. What makes him think comp.lang.c is any more appropriate a place than the shops or the library for his proselytism is anyone's guess. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 13:37 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) |
| Message-ID | <55AFD4CC.7060003@verizon.net> |
| In reply to | #66170 |
On 07/22/2015 01:28 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote: > On 22/07/15 16:07, David Brown wrote: >> On 22/07/15 16:42, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: ... >>> Talking about politics. Discussions about Jesus Christ are appropriate >>> in all places, at all times, in all situations, as "man does not live by >>> bread alone, but by EVERY word which proceeds from the mouth of God." ... > Presumably he doesn't harangue customers at his local shops with > religious diatribes every time he pops out for half a pound of carrots > or a bottle of wine, or get thrown out of libraries for soap-boxing. I think that's a bad presumption - I don't see how he could possibly say what he did above, and not apply it in those locations. Possibly he's a hypocrite, and only actually behaves that way in contexts (such as usenet) where people can't punish him for his rudeness. But that wouldn't be my first assumption.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 15:04 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) |
| Message-ID | <moot7q$e5v$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #66173 |
On 7/22/2015 12:37 PM, James Kuyper wrote: > On 07/22/2015 01:28 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote: >> On 22/07/15 16:07, David Brown wrote: >>> On 22/07/15 16:42, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > ... >>>> Talking about politics. Discussions about Jesus Christ are appropriate >>>> in all places, at all times, in all situations, as "man does not live by >>>> bread alone, but by EVERY word which proceeds from the mouth of God." > ... >> Presumably he doesn't harangue customers at his local shops with >> religious diatribes every time he pops out for half a pound of carrots >> or a bottle of wine, or get thrown out of libraries for soap-boxing. > > I think that's a bad presumption - I don't see how he could possibly say > what he did above, and not apply it in those locations. Possibly he's a > hypocrite, and only actually behaves that way in contexts (such as > usenet) where people can't punish him for his rudeness. But that > wouldn't be my first assumption. > yeah. some of us though would rather keep our beliefs to ourselves unless it becomes actually relevant. like, debating religion or politics in online forums, rarely productive. it is one thing to have opinions and beliefs, or to want the freedom that people can have their beliefs and the freedom to not need to keep a secret about them for fear of retaliation, and another to try to force them on anyone who happens to be in the immediate vicinity. it may be the case that not everyone will agree with everyone else, and sometimes one person will hold views that the other person considers "offensive", but whatever sometimes. overall it is better when every person can make a free choice as to what it is they will do and what they will believe. nevermind sometimes if people on the left or on the right want to take away peoples' ability to freely decide on things (both sides have particular lifestyles they want to force on everyone). but, will say, if I said what I really think, probably some people would take offense. can't have that, because everyone is a precious little snowflake who can't dare be offended, or tolerate that anyone may exist who doesn't approve of their lifestyle choices, ... rather annoying sometimes, but whatever... (like accusing everyone who doesn't agree with their particular views or lifestyle as being a "intolerant closed minded bigot", rather than, you know, them being the closed-minded bigot for not willing to be tolerant that anyone exists who doesn't agree with them...) or something...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 10:39 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) |
| Message-ID | <888e93a0-8c4a-417b-a9c0-bf016fd3736f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #66170 |
On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 1:29:10 PM UTC-4, Richard Heathfield wrote:
> On 22/07/15 16:07, David Brown wrote:
> > On 22/07/15 16:42, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 9:30:14 AM UTC-4, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> >>> Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> >>>> [snip]
> >>> I'm not sure what's more off-topic here. Talking about (American)
> >>> politics or your endless God-drivel.
> >>
> >> Talking about politics. Discussions about Jesus Christ are appropriate
> >> in all places, at all times, in all situations, as "man does not live by
> >> bread alone, but by EVERY word which proceeds from the mouth of God."
> >>
> >
> > My understanding was that the Bible encouraged people to show their
> > faith through their deeds, not just words.
>
> That's what he thinks he's doing, and he's not interested in your point
> of view. He wants this newsgroup to become a religious debating ground
> for Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Judaists, Atheists, and all the
> rest of them, and to hell with the topic.
Incorrect. I do not debate people. I teach them about Jesus Christ,
and (generally speaking) I answer questions, though I don't always
answer the question that's asked, but teach on the subject that
relates to the question that was asked.
> Presumably he doesn't harangue customers at his local shops with
> religious diatribes every time he pops out for half a pound of carrots
> or a bottle of wine, or get thrown out of libraries for soap-boxing.
> What makes him think comp.lang.c is any more appropriate a place than
> the shops or the library for his proselytism is anyone's guess.
I wear a hat that, instead of saying "Intel Inside" with a swoosh,
says "Jesus Inside," and "Jesus <3 You". You can find them here,
though this one says "I LOVE JESUS" on the side where mine says
"Jesus [Heart] You":
http://www.amazon.com/Jesus-Inside-Christian-Baseball-White/dp/B00A91W15W/ref=pd_d0_recs_v2_cwb_ap_4
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 19:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) |
| Message-ID | <moom7e$kek$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #66174 |
On 22/07/15 18:39, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 1:29:10 PM UTC-4, Richard Heathfield wrote: >> On 22/07/15 16:07, David Brown wrote: >> > On 22/07/15 16:42, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 9:30:14 AM UTC-4, Kenny McCormack wrote: >> >>> Rick C. Hodgin wrote: >> >>>> [snip] >> >>> I'm not sure what's more off-topic here. Talking about (American) >> >>> politics or your endless God-drivel. >> >> >> >> Talking about politics. Discussions about Jesus Christ are appropriate >> >> in all places, at all times, in all situations, as "man does not live by >> >> bread alone, but by EVERY word which proceeds from the mouth of God." >> >> >> > >> > My understanding was that the Bible encouraged people to show their >> > faith through their deeds, not just words. >> >> That's what he thinks he's doing, and he's not interested in your point >> of view. He wants this newsgroup to become a religious debating ground >> for Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Judaists, Atheists, and all the >> rest of them, and to hell with the topic. > > Incorrect. If you want to protect this newsgroup from becoming a religious debating ground, you are going about it in *exactly* the wrong way. > I do not debate people. Right, because you're Not Interested in what we have to say. > I teach them about Jesus Christ, You may think so, but I think you're teaching them about Rick C Hodgin's Personal Theology, which isn't the same thing at all. <snip> >> Presumably he doesn't harangue customers at his local shops with >> religious diatribes every time he pops out for half a pound of carrots >> or a bottle of wine, or get thrown out of libraries for soap-boxing. >> What makes him think comp.lang.c is any more appropriate a place than >> the shops or the library for his proselytism is anyone's guess. > > I wear a hat So, as I suspected, you don't harangue people in public. Well, Rick C Hodgin, this is a public newsgroup, and your haranguing is no more welcome here than it is there. The only real difference is that your local shopkeeper or librarian can summon law enforcement officers to deal with your anti-social behaviour, whereas here we have no recourse. I am concerned about this, because it's counter-productive. You make out, by your example, that Christians are anti-social, ignorant, and poor theologians to boot. Who in their right mind would want to become a Christian if to do so required them to behave as boorishly and rudely as they see you behaving? > that, instead of saying "Intel Inside" with a swoosh, > says "Jesus Inside," and "Jesus <3 You". You can find them here, > though this one says "I LOVE JESUS" on the side where mine says > "Jesus [Heart] You": The moral equivalent in comp.lang.c is a sig block. Think of the sig block as your hat, your badge, your bumper sticker, or even your pulpit. The sig block is up to four lines of up-to-80-column text following the sequence "-- \n" (two dashes, a space, a newline) at the end of your article. Its contents do not have to be topical. A sig block can be as preachy as you like and nobody will have any grounds for complaint. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 11:39 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) |
| Message-ID | <9e740a43-6f77-4d07-8bce-17891f466f4a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #66176 |
On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 2:10:31 PM UTC-4, Richard Heathfield wrote: > On 22/07/15 18:39, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > > I teach them about Jesus Christ, > > You may think so, but I think you're teaching them about Rick C Hodgin's > Personal Theology, which isn't the same thing at all. Point out where I'm wrong and I'll backup every statement I've made with multiple scripture references conveying the concept, if not the exact wording. And if and where I cannot, then I'll admit my mistake and adopt the correct understanding, because I seek the truth in coming to understand and in following Jesus Christ. Best regards, Rick C. Hodgin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 20:01 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) |
| Message-ID | <moop8d$v17$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #66179 |
On 22/07/15 19:39, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 2:10:31 PM UTC-4, Richard Heathfield wrote: >> On 22/07/15 18:39, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: >> > I teach them about Jesus Christ, >> >> You may think so, but I think you're teaching them about Rick C Hodgin's >> Personal Theology, which isn't the same thing at all. > > Point out where I'm wrong As people keep telling you, this newsgroup is for discussing C, not Christian theology. Find a group where Christian theology is topical, and ask in there. <snip> -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 12:06 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) |
| Message-ID | <ef58660c-1ec5-47ae-aa57-3691defbe14e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #66180 |
On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 3:02:11 PM UTC-4, Richard Heathfield wrote:
> On 22/07/15 19:39, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 2:10:31 PM UTC-4, Richard Heathfield wrote:
> >> On 22/07/15 18:39, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> >> > I teach them about Jesus Christ,
> >>
> >> You may think so, but I think you're teaching them about Rick C Hodgin's
> >> Personal Theology, which isn't the same thing at all.
> >
> > Point out where I'm wrong
>
> As people keep telling you, this newsgroup is for discussing C, not
> Christian theology. Find a group where Christian theology is topical,
> and ask in there.
Theologically.
But in response to this particular reply you offer, I offer this:
http://biblehub.com/acts/4-19.htm
"But Peter and John answered and said unto them, Whether it be
right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto
God, judge ye."
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 20:51 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) |
| Message-ID | <moos4e$avo$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #66181 |
On 22/07/15 20:06, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 3:02:11 PM UTC-4, Richard Heathfield wrote: >> On 22/07/15 19:39, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: >> > On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 2:10:31 PM UTC-4, Richard Heathfield wrote: >> >> On 22/07/15 18:39, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: >> >> > I teach them about Jesus Christ, >> >> >> >> You may think so, but I think you're teaching them about Rick C Hodgin's >> >> Personal Theology, which isn't the same thing at all. >> > >> > Point out where I'm wrong >> >> As people keep telling you, this newsgroup is for discussing C, not >> Christian theology. Find a group where Christian theology is topical, >> and ask in there. > > Theologically. > > But in response to this particular reply you offer, I offer this: There are none so blind as those who will not see. (Jer 5:21) -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | guinness.tony@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 17:48 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) |
| Message-ID | <957a6a50-ba07-4b7e-99a0-559c53b39893@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #66181 |
On Wednesday, 22 July 2015 20:06:44 UTC+1, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 3:02:11 PM UTC-4, Richard Heathfield wrote: > > On 22/07/15 19:39, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > > > On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 2:10:31 PM UTC-4, Richard Heathfield wrote: > > >> On 22/07/15 18:39, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > > >> > I teach them about Jesus Christ, > > >> > > >> You may think so, but I think you're teaching them about Rick C Hodgin's > > >> Personal Theology, which isn't the same thing at all. > > > > > > Point out where I'm wrong > > > > As people keep telling you, this newsgroup is for discussing C, not > > Christian theology. Find a group where Christian theology is topical, > > and ask in there. > > Theologically. > > But in response to this particular reply you offer, I offer this: Matthew 27:5 - "... and he went out and hanged himself." Luke 10:27 - "... go and do thou likewise."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 19:50 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) |
| Message-ID | <55aff3ce.18833734@news.xs4all.nl> |
| In reply to | #66179 |
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote: > Point out where I'm wrong Everywhere. Beginning with the presumption that you're doing God's work, rather than the Devil's. Richard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 13:15 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) |
| Message-ID | <ef14c154-99d7-44e8-8a59-2d1b2fc11194@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #66186 |
On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 3:51:04 PM UTC-4, Richard Bos wrote:
> "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Point out where I'm wrong
>
> Everywhere.
>
> Beginning with the presumption that you're doing God's work, rather than
> the Devil's.
You are not a Christian. It is not possible for you to understand
what I am doing for this reason:
http://biblehub.com/1_corinthians/1-18.htm
"For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish
foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power
of God."
And:
http://biblehub.com/john/6-44.htm
"No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent
me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day."
God knows every man's heart. Those who have an ear to hear the
Lord will be drawn to Him and be saved. The rest will perish.
I pray that all here in comp.lang.c who can hear His voice humble
themselves, acknowledge their sin, repent, and ask forgiveness,
that they too may be given eternal life.
http://biblehub.com/proverbs/14-12.htm
http://biblehub.com/proverbs/16-25.htm
"There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end
thereof are the ways of death."
And for that woman you're sleeping with, or having an affair with...
this is her true appearance:
http://tinypic.com/r/fld2q8/8
But the "good news" (the "gospel") is that you CAN be forgiven.
Everything is in place for you to be forgiven. You just need to
approach Jesus Christ humbly, truthfully, and ask forgiveness,
with repentance, and He will forgive you.
It's like a house that needs painted. The house can be there.
The supplies for painting (paint, buckets, ladders, sheets, brushes,
rollers, sprayers). But unless someone goes and paints the house,
only the possibility of having the house painted exists. It requires
that someone go, get off their duff and do the work.
With the Lord, His sacrifice is sufficient for you. He can take away
your sin as well. All you have to do is get off your duff and do the
work, which in this case is believing in Him, humbling yourself before
Him, admitting you're a sinner, repenting, and asking forgiveness.
He says:
http://biblehub.com/matthew/11-28.htm
http://biblehub.com/matthew/11-29.htm
"28 Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and
I will give you rest. 29 Take my yoke upon you, and learn
of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find
rest unto your souls."
Jesus sets men free. It's why the enemy wants so much so silence
Him and all who would bring His message. But His message is that
which people need to hear more than any other thing in their life,
for it is only His message that leads to eternal life. And all
who receive it will live. And all who will not receive it will
perish.
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 21:28 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) |
| Message-ID | <moouab$jbf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #66189 |
On 22/07/15 21:15, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 3:51:04 PM UTC-4, Richard Bos wrote: >> "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Point out where I'm wrong >> >> Everywhere. >> >> Beginning with the presumption that you're doing God's work, rather than >> the Devil's. > > You are not a Christian. Actually, he is on record as saying that he is. You just broke Matthew 7:1. Ouch. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 21:44 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic |
| Message-ID | <877fprly79.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #66191 |
Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes: > On 22/07/15 21:15, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > >> You are not a Christian. > > Actually, he is on record as saying that he is. You just broke Matthew > 7:1. Ouch. I bet you he's wearing mixed fibres, too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Morris Dovey <mrdovey@iedu.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 16:35 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) |
| Message-ID | <mop2bh$bca$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #66189 |
On 7/22/15 3:15 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 3:51:04 PM UTC-4, Richard Bos wrote: >>> "Rick C. Hodgin"<rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Point out where I'm wrong 1 Thessalonians [4:11] And that ye study to be quiet, and to do your own business, and to work with your own hands, as we commanded you. [4:12] That ye may walk honestly toward them that are without, and that ye may have lack of nothing. You’re not doing a very good job of talking the talk. How good are you at walking the walk? Modern Thessalonians could use your help. -- Morris Dovey http://www.iedu.com/Solar
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 15:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) |
| Message-ID | <78ef155e-bf31-4c95-a81a-8bdb69b3c219@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #66207 |
It is appointed unto men once to die, and then the judgement. Jesus Christ sets men free from that judgement, and gives them eternal life. I don't know when each of you will die, or when I will die. None of us do, but I desire to speak His words until that day. I do so because His words are spirit, and they are life. I labor in this world for all who have an ear to hear, that they may hear, believe, come out from the world, and be saved. It is a mission of love, and it is to spare you from the judgement that stands before you, getting closer with each tick tock of the clock. It is a very important matter. Do not dismiss the Lord, or His call on your life. Best regards, Rick C. Hodgin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Morris Dovey <mrdovey@iedu.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-05 15:20 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) |
| Message-ID | <msfiqg$alj$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #66211 |
On 7/22/15 5:17 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > It is appointed unto men once to die, and then > the judgement. Jesus Christ sets men free from > that judgement, and gives them eternal life. > > I don't know when each of you will die, or when > I will die. None of us do, but I desire to speak > His words until that day. I do so because His > words are spirit, and they are life. > > I labor in this world for all who have an ear to > hear, that they may hear, believe, come out > from the world, and be saved. > > It is a mission of love, and it is to spare you > from the judgement that stands before you, > getting closer with each tick tock of the clock. > > It is a very important matter. Do not dismiss > the Lord, or His call on your life. > > Best regards, > Rick C. Hodgin whatever that means. Missed your good works in Thessaloniki last month. I’m guessing you think you’re called to talk/type. I suppose we should all be impressed by your dedication. :-/ -- Morris Dovey http://www.iedu.com/Solar/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-05 23:01 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) |
| Message-ID | <87a68794-2a4c-4ad2-8815-2135df2f511f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #69531 |
On Saturday, September 5, 2015 at 4:20:44 PM UTC-4, Morris Dovey wrote:
> On 7/22/15 5:17 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> > It is appointed unto men once to die, and then
> > the judgement. Jesus Christ sets men free from
> > that judgement, and gives them eternal life.
> >
> > I don't know when each of you will die, or when
> > I will die. None of us do, but I desire to speak
> > His words until that day. I do so because His
> > words are spirit, and they are life.
> >
> > I labor in this world for all who have an ear to
> > hear, that they may hear, believe, come out
> > from the world, and be saved.
> >
> > It is a mission of love, and it is to spare you
> > from the judgement that stands before you,
> > getting closer with each tick tock of the clock.
> >
> > It is a very important matter. Do not dismiss
> > the Lord, or His call on your life.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Rick C. Hodgin
>
> whatever that means.
> Missed your good works in Thessaloniki last month.
> I'm guessing you think you're called to talk/type.
We are all called to go into the world and teach, and make disciples,
teaching them to obey all things whatsoever He has commanded, baptizing
them in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. People
think that translated word "baptizing" there refers to water... I don't
think it does. I believe it refers to the concept used in cooking, such
as you baptize pickles in some recipes, first dipping them in boiling
water, then in vinegar. They come out changed through the immersion,
which I don't believe is only water immersion, but you are instead to
surround people with knowledge and example of the Father, Son, and the
Holy Ghost, immersing them in that knowledge, as it were.
This realization is not from a study of other people's works, but an
understanding of who God is, and what He would be commanding us to do.
The verse leading up to that command in Matthew 28:19, comes from
Matthew 28:18, which reads:
http://biblehub.com/matthew/28-18.htm
"And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given
unto me in heaven and in earth."
All power. He is ahead of all things, and in our lives He is to be
placed ahead of all things, and not just in our lives, but as the
light shining around us in the darkness. Jesus is that light, and
unless we speak about Him, and teach others about who He really is,
the only witness people will have about who Jesus Christ is comes
from that which the enemy will teach, and they, through sin, will
be all too willing to hear. But when the truth is taught, it has
a different call, a different voice, and some people will hear it,
and come out, and be saved. It is for those people we labor.
> I suppose we should all be impressed by your
> dedication. :-/
It's not just here, Morris. I am a disciple of Jesus Christ. I
have been changed from the inside out. Jesus died for me, and took
away my sin and gave me eternal life. That is no small thing. It
is the biggest thing with regards to me that could ever happen.
And because of who He is, and because of what He's done for me, and
because of what He offers to all other people on the planet, I reach
out and speak about Him and teach. Some will hear, most won't, but
it is for those who will hear I labor, and it is for those who will
hear Jesus gave us that command in Matthew 28:19, the so-called
"Great Commission."
Perhaps someday Jesus will move you to reach out and teach so that
the false teaching about who Jesus is, what sin is, why sin is
damaging, and why we need salvation from Jesus Christ, won't come
only from Satan, but rather the truth will come from you, a disciple
of Jesus Christ who speaks about Him in this world, fulfilling the
Great Commission.
Here's a movie to encourage you to get you started:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEFOw5ZYnqM
The people in that philosophy club meeting had only heard falseness
from the world about who Jesus is. The teaching of the truth changed
people's thinking, and that call of the truth was heard by some there.
It is important to do this, Morris. More important than other things.
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | wssimms@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-06 01:58 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Let's see who can be the most off-topic (Was: AVCALL ...) Generic function-calling code) |
| Message-ID | <0b56f91b-4617-4c4d-b98a-ec28f26eb3df@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #69579 |
Am Sonntag, 6. September 2015 15:01:11 UTC+9 schrieb Rick C. Hodgin: > On Saturday, September 5, 2015 at 4:20:44 PM UTC-4, Morris Dovey wrote: > > On 7/22/15 5:17 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > > > It is appointed unto men once to die, and then > > > the judgement. Jesus Christ sets men free from > > > that judgement, and gives them eternal life. > > > > > > I don't know when each of you will die, or when > > > I will die. None of us do, but I desire to speak > > > His words until that day. I do so because His > > > words are spirit, and they are life. > > > > > > I labor in this world for all who have an ear to > > > hear, that they may hear, believe, come out > > > from the world, and be saved. > > > > > > It is a mission of love, and it is to spare you > > > from the judgement that stands before you, > > > getting closer with each tick tock of the clock. > > > > > > It is a very important matter. Do not dismiss > > > the Lord, or His call on your life. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Rick C. Hodgin > > > > whatever that means. > > Missed your good works in Thessaloniki last month. > > I'm guessing you think you're called to talk/type. > > We are all called to go into the world and teach, and make disciples, > teaching them to obey all things whatsoever He has commanded, baptizing > them in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. People > think that translated word "baptizing" there refers to water... I don't > think it does. I believe it refers to the concept used in cooking, such > as you baptize pickles in some recipes, first dipping them in boiling > water, then in vinegar. They come out changed through the immersion, > which I don't believe is only water immersion, but you are instead to > surround people with knowledge and example of the Father, Son, and the > Holy Ghost, immersing them in that knowledge, as it were. It is fortunate then, I suppose, that it apparently doesn't really matter how you interpret the Bible. If you say water baptism is not necessary, and someone else says it is, then that has no effect on either of your ability to "be saved", right? Of course that makes me wonder if perhaps one is free to substitute some personal interpretation of resurrection for the historical understanding of the word. If there's no "right" interpretation, then I guess you could. On the other hand, if there are a "right" and a "wrong" interpretations of any particular passage in the Bible, then it seems pretty important to figure out what the "right" one is, because your eternal salvation or damnation may well depend upon it. Maybe it's just that Rick C. Hodgin happens to know all the "right" interpretations and the thousands, if not millions, if not hundreds of millions who had other ideas about the doctrines taught in the Bible were just "wrong", and are perhaps condemned to eternal damnation because of it. That would be convenient for him. Unlucky for everyone else. Seems kind of odd to me that God would make eternal salvation dependent on knowing and believing the right doctrine without providing some way for people to have absolute assurance what that doctrine is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c
csiph-web