Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #59531 > unrolled thread

Re: Sequencing of operands and arguments

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Sequencing of operands and arguments Lőrinczy Zsigmond <nospam@for.me> - 2015-04-03 19:24 +0200
    Re: Sequencing of operands and arguments James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-04-03 14:12 -0400
      Re: Sequencing of operands and arguments Lőrinczy Zsigmond <nospam@for.me> - 2015-04-04 08:06 +0200

#59531 — Re: Sequencing of operands and arguments

There are a few operators where the evaluation order is defined,
afaik they are these: && || ?: ,
Mind you, the last one (comma operator) doesn't refer
to the function call operator, where the evaluation order isn't defined.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#59537

On 04/03/2015 01:24 PM, Lőrinczy Zsigmond wrote:
> There are a few operators where the evaluation order is defined,
> afaik they are these: && || ?: ,
> Mind you, the last one (comma operator) doesn't refer
> to the function call operator, where the evaluation order isn't defined.

You seem to be picking up threads that were ended months ago, and
restarting them with random (and not particularly relevant) new
comments. What's going on?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#59576

> You seem to be picking up threads that were ended months ago, and
> restarting them with random (and not particularly relevant) new
> comments. What's going on?
Sorry, I might have set the sort-order in my NNTP-client the wrong way.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c

csiph-web