Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #24707 > unrolled thread
| Started by | lovecreatesbeauty <lovecreatesbeauty@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-08-22 10:34 -0700 |
| Last post | 2012-08-27 22:41 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 192 — 45 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c
GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded lovecreatesbeauty <lovecreatesbeauty@gmail.com> - 2012-08-22 10:34 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-08-22 19:50 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded fmassei@gmail.com - 2012-08-22 11:04 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-22 14:22 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-08-22 18:43 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-22 12:08 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-08-22 12:32 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-08-22 20:45 +0100
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-22 22:20 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Chicken McNuggets <chicken@mcnuggets.com> - 2012-08-23 10:43 +0100
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2012-08-23 21:14 +0200
[OT] Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2012-08-23 13:27 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2012-08-23 22:38 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2012-08-22 13:40 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded lovecreatesbeauty <lovecreatesbeauty@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 00:15 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-23 00:40 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Mark Bluemel <mark_bluemel@pobox.com> - 2012-08-23 09:48 +0100
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-22 15:56 -0500
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Chicken McNuggets <chicken@mcnuggets.com> - 2012-08-23 10:49 +0100
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-23 08:32 -0500
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Chicken McNuggets <chicken@mcnuggets.com> - 2012-08-23 14:49 +0100
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-23 17:23 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded fmassei@gmail.com - 2012-08-23 08:43 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-23 17:52 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 18:41 +0100
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2012-08-23 17:42 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2012-08-23 17:43 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-23 18:54 -0500
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-08-24 09:51 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-08-24 06:21 -0500
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Chicken McNuggets <chicken@mcnuggets.com> - 2012-09-03 16:55 +0100
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-08-24 13:36 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Andrew Smallshaw <andrews@sdf.lonestar.org> - 2012-08-27 06:05 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-08-23 12:56 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-29 21:10 +0100
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2012-08-23 21:23 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 18:37 +0100
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2012-08-23 21:19 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-25 02:40 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2012-08-23 21:15 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-08-24 09:52 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-08-25 07:51 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-08-26 23:09 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-08-22 17:43 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2012-08-23 20:17 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-24 15:09 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-24 17:53 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-24 19:02 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-24 20:53 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-24 21:33 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-25 02:33 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-25 11:41 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-08-26 08:04 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-24 21:08 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-24 21:37 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-22 15:13 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-08-23 10:09 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-08-23 13:00 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-09-07 06:33 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-08-25 09:06 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-25 11:31 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-08-25 13:45 -0500
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-25 21:16 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-25 15:37 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-25 21:40 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-08-25 15:01 -0500
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-25 22:03 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-25 17:11 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-26 11:46 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-08-25 03:07 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-25 12:22 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-25 09:35 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-25 17:28 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-25 15:00 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-25 21:17 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-08-25 14:23 -0500
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-25 21:26 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-08-25 15:02 -0500
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-25 22:00 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-25 15:50 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-25 12:09 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-25 21:20 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-25 17:32 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-25 17:55 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-25 18:49 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-25 15:23 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-25 21:30 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-26 02:19 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-26 02:23 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-25 18:02 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-26 09:18 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-26 02:04 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-26 13:35 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded eq mail <eq.mail.id@gmail.com> - 2012-08-31 02:10 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 15:59 +0100
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-25 17:26 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-08-25 13:50 -0500
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-25 21:21 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-25 15:27 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-08-25 21:36 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-06 14:41 +0300
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-09-07 17:50 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-07 19:13 +0300
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-09-07 19:17 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-09 11:12 +0300
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-07 19:37 +0300
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-09-07 19:22 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-25 12:14 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-08-25 23:13 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-08-26 00:28 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-08-26 11:15 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-26 17:33 +0100
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-08-26 18:59 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-26 14:07 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Andrew Cooper <amc96@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-08-22 22:37 +0100
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-22 15:16 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded pacman@kosh.dhis.org (Alan Curry) - 2012-08-22 22:26 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-08-23 02:07 +0100
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-22 22:42 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-08-23 00:54 -0500
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded nroberts <roberts.noah@gmail.com> - 2012-08-24 16:16 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> - 2012-08-23 13:10 -0500
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-24 02:15 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-08-24 13:58 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> - 2012-08-24 23:12 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2012-08-25 21:35 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2012-08-25 14:59 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2012-08-26 12:34 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> - 2012-08-25 23:52 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201208.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-08-30 03:18 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-08-27 13:41 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-27 15:23 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-08-29 10:55 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-08-25 03:14 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 11:18 +0100
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-25 12:18 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded lovecreatesbeauty <lovecreatesbeauty@gmail.com> - 2012-08-26 20:06 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-26 21:04 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded lovecreatesbeauty <lovecreatesbeauty@gmail.com> - 2012-08-27 00:19 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-27 01:33 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-27 08:26 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded lovecreatesbeauty <lovecreatesbeauty@gmail.com> - 2012-08-27 07:36 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-27 17:48 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-08-28 06:15 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-27 12:27 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-27 19:11 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-27 13:38 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-27 21:48 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-27 21:54 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-27 21:56 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-27 16:09 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-27 22:14 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded lovecreatesbeauty <lovecreatesbeauty@gmail.com> - 2012-08-27 18:25 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-27 18:34 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded eq mail <eq.mail.id@gmail.com> - 2012-08-27 18:45 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-27 19:24 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-09-07 07:00 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded lovecreatesbeauty <lovecreatesbeauty@gmail.com> - 2012-08-27 23:47 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-28 01:27 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-27 15:20 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-28 00:55 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-27 16:43 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-28 09:01 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded ais523 <ais523@bham.ac.uk> - 2012-08-27 23:16 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-27 17:34 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-28 03:16 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-28 09:07 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-28 13:47 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-28 16:17 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded lawrence.jones@siemens.com - 2012-08-31 17:40 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-09-02 00:59 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net> - 2012-09-03 00:31 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-09-03 08:31 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-09-03 09:13 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2012-09-03 15:38 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-09-03 18:38 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2012-09-03 17:04 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-09-03 23:19 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Herbert Rosenau <os2guy@pc-rosenau.de> - 2012-09-03 21:48 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-09-03 23:41 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> - 2012-09-03 19:37 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-09-04 10:14 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-09-07 07:18 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded ais523 <ais523@bham.ac.uk> - 2012-08-28 01:40 +0000
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-08-29 11:02 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-27 22:29 -0400
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-28 21:11 +0100
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-29 01:38 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-28 17:12 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-27 18:41 +0200
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-27 15:08 -0700
Re: GCC is re-implementing in C++ and C discarded James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-27 22:41 -0400
Page 2 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 10 Next page →
| From | Chicken McNuggets <chicken@mcnuggets.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-23 14:49 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k15cdg$cmc$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #24748 |
On 23/08/2012 14:32, Robert Wessel wrote: > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:49:35 +0100, Chicken McNuggets > <chicken@mcnuggets.com> wrote: > >> On 22/08/2012 21:56, Robert Wessel wrote: >> >>> >>> *Objective C would have a similar high level of C compatibility as >>> C++, for example, but I think you'd be hard pressed to consider that >>> as sufficiently mainstream. >>> >> >> I'm not so sure. Objective-C is growing in popularity all the time. It >> has the advantage that any valid C program is a valid Objective-C >> program and can also use C++ classes directly via Objective-C++. Sounds >> like a win / win situation to me. > > > Outside the Apple world, the use of Objective-C relative to C++ > appears to be miniscule, bordering on the non-existent. > According to the Tiobe language index for August 2012 it is the third most popular language (ahead of C++). http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-23 17:23 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ZJqdnSmNDvtI16vNnZ2dnUVZ7v-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #24749 |
Il 8/23/2012 3:49 PM, Chicken McNuggets ha scritto: > On 23/08/2012 14:32, Robert Wessel wrote: [..] >> Outside the Apple world, the use of Objective-C relative to C++ >> appears to be miniscule, bordering on the non-existent. >> > > According to the Tiobe language index for August 2012 it is the third > most popular language (ahead of C++). > > http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html That doesn't prove that Objective-C is as popular outside the Apple world. -- Vincenzo Mercuri
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | fmassei@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-23 08:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f6e36ac9-f455-459d-9f42-7a6f2ab044f2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #24751 |
On Thursday, August 23, 2012 5:23:01 PM UTC+2, Vincenzo Mercuri wrote: > Il 8/23/2012 3:49 PM, Chicken McNuggets ha scritto: > > > On 23/08/2012 14:32, Robert Wessel wrote: > > >> Outside the Apple world, the use of Objective-C relative to C++ > >> appears to be miniscule, bordering on the non-existent. > > > > According to the Tiobe language index for August 2012 it is the third > > most popular language (ahead of C++). > > > > http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html > > > > That doesn't prove that Objective-C is as popular outside the Apple world. > Given this data, I'd say that the Apple-world is more popular than C++ Ciao!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-23 17:52 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q8ydnR4ND9w_zKvNnZ2dnUVZ8sWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #24752 |
Il 8/23/2012 5:43 PM, fmassei@gmail.com ha scritto: > On Thursday, August 23, 2012 5:23:01 PM UTC+2, Vincenzo Mercuri wrote: >> Il 8/23/2012 3:49 PM, Chicken McNuggets ha scritto: >> >>> On 23/08/2012 14:32, Robert Wessel wrote: >> >>>> Outside the Apple world, the use of Objective-C relative to C++ >>>> appears to be miniscule, bordering on the non-existent. >> >> >>> According to the Tiobe language index for August 2012 it is the third >>> most popular language (ahead of C++). >>> >>> http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html >> >> >> >> That doesn't prove that Objective-C is as popular outside the Apple world. >> > > Given this data, I'd say that the Apple-world is more popular than C++ > Not really an Apple to Apple comparison ;) -- Vincenzo Mercuri
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-23 18:41 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k15pvn$fhj$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #24752 |
fmassei@gmail.com wrote: > Given this data, I'd say that the Apple-world is more popular than C++ It may be more popular in youtube and in a set of random blogs, but that is meaningless and it isn't exactly what a programming language is for. Rui Maciel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-23 17:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <k15q2u$dhh$3@news.xmission.com> |
| In reply to | #24766 |
In article <k15pvn$fhj$2@speranza.aioe.org>, Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> wrote: >fmassei@gmail.com wrote: > >> Given this data, I'd say that the Apple-world is more popular than C++ > >It may be more popular in youtube and in a set of random blogs, but that is >meaningless and it isn't exactly what a programming language is for. I'm curious exactly how you would answer the question (below) if you were being perfectly honest and not trying to impress anyone on Usenet. Q: What exactly do we mean when we say that language A is more "popular" than language B? -- Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? ~ Epicurus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-23 17:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <k15q4s$dhh$4@news.xmission.com> |
| In reply to | #24767 |
In article <k15q2u$dhh$3@news.xmission.com>, Kenny McCormack <gazelle@shell.xmission.com> wrote: ... >Q: What exactly do we mean when we say that language A is more "popular" >than language B? I suggest that the most common interpretation of this question is: Q: What language should I study in school to maximize my chances of getting a job? -- Given Bush and his insanely expensive wars (*), that we will be paying for for generations to come, the only possible response a sensible person need ever give, when a GOPer/TeaBagger says anything about "deficits", is a polite snicker. (*) Obvious money transfers between the taxpayers and Bush's moneyed interests. Someday, we'll actually figure out a way to have a war where the money just gets moved around and nobody (on either side) gets injured or killed. That will be an accomplishment of which we will be justly proud.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-23 18:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <64gd38he98pj7n3lf26cf4vcuu71tqdj3n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #24769 |
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:43:56 +0000 (UTC), gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) wrote: >In article <k15q2u$dhh$3@news.xmission.com>, >Kenny McCormack <gazelle@shell.xmission.com> wrote: >... >>Q: What exactly do we mean when we say that language A is more "popular" >>than language B? > >I suggest that the most common interpretation of this question is: > >Q: What language should I study in school to maximize my chances of getting >a job? That's probably true, although somewhat difficult to measure. Other useful answers might be the amount of work to be done (measured how?), number of hours spent writing code, KLOCs being written, etc... Tiobe has some other metric (something approximating a measure of the chatter about the language on the Internet). How that relates to an actual useful measure, I have no idea, but Tiobe's measure is certainly not a direct measure of anything useful (unless maybe you wanted to write a book or teach classes on a programming language). In the case of Objective-C, approximately everyone and their idiot brother is developing iOS apps. So there's lots of talk about the relatively new platform. By contrast, C (and C++) is much better understood, and I'd guess that the relative amount of chatter is lower compared to the amount of actual work being done.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-24 09:51 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <VaidnaufNbgEr6rNnZ2dnUVZ8mednZ2d@lyse.net> |
| In reply to | #24809 |
On 24/08/2012 01:54, Robert Wessel wrote: > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:43:56 +0000 (UTC), gazelle@shell.xmission.com > (Kenny McCormack) wrote: > >> In article <k15q2u$dhh$3@news.xmission.com>, >> Kenny McCormack <gazelle@shell.xmission.com> wrote: >> ... >>> Q: What exactly do we mean when we say that language A is more "popular" >>> than language B? >> >> I suggest that the most common interpretation of this question is: >> >> Q: What language should I study in school to maximize my chances of getting >> a job? > > > That's probably true, although somewhat difficult to measure. Other > useful answers might be the amount of work to be done (measured how?), > number of hours spent writing code, KLOCs being written, etc... > > Tiobe has some other metric (something approximating a measure of the > chatter about the language on the Internet). How that relates to an > actual useful measure, I have no idea, but Tiobe's measure is > certainly not a direct measure of anything useful (unless maybe you > wanted to write a book or teach classes on a programming language). > > In the case of Objective-C, approximately everyone and their idiot > brother is developing iOS apps. So there's lots of talk about the > relatively new platform. By contrast, C (and C++) is much better > understood, and I'd guess that the relative amount of chatter is lower > compared to the amount of actual work being done. > Whereas real programmers work in C, but we don't sit around all day talking about it... More accurately, "real" programmers probably don't discuss their programming languages in the sorts of places that Tiobe looks at, such as facebook. If they looked at newsgroups or sites like Stackoverflow, they might get different results.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-24 06:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <k17nqp$b0h$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #24826 |
David Brown wrote: > On 24/08/2012 01:54, Robert Wessel wrote: >> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:43:56 +0000 (UTC), gazelle@shell.xmission.com >> (Kenny McCormack) wrote: >> >>> In article <k15q2u$dhh$3@news.xmission.com>, >>> Kenny McCormack <gazelle@shell.xmission.com> wrote: >>> ... >>>> Q: What exactly do we mean when we say that language A is more >>>> "popular" >>>> than language B? >>> >>> I suggest that the most common interpretation of this question is: >>> >>> Q: What language should I study in school to maximize my chances of >>> getting >>> a job? >> >> >> That's probably true, although somewhat difficult to measure. Other >> useful answers might be the amount of work to be done (measured how?), >> number of hours spent writing code, KLOCs being written, etc... >> >> Tiobe has some other metric (something approximating a measure of the >> chatter about the language on the Internet). How that relates to an >> actual useful measure, I have no idea, but Tiobe's measure is >> certainly not a direct measure of anything useful (unless maybe you >> wanted to write a book or teach classes on a programming language). >> >> In the case of Objective-C, approximately everyone and their idiot >> brother is developing iOS apps. So there's lots of talk about the >> relatively new platform. By contrast, C (and C++) is much better >> understood, and I'd guess that the relative amount of chatter is lower >> compared to the amount of actual work being done. >> > > Whereas real programmers work in C, but we don't sit around all day > talking about it... > > > More accurately, "real" programmers probably don't discuss their > programming languages in the sorts of places that Tiobe looks at, such > as facebook. If they looked at newsgroups or sites like Stackoverflow, > they might get different results. > Even Stackoverlfow et al have significant bias towards the newer languages. Because, well, they're newer. We*/I have looked hard at Objective C three times in the last twenty years or so, but ended up not using it for the usual path dependent reasons. *whoever that was at the time... -- Les Cargill
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chicken McNuggets <chicken@mcnuggets.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-09-03 16:55 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k22jtd$o2d$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #24809 |
On 24/08/2012 00:54, Robert Wessel wrote: > In the case of Objective-C, approximately everyone and their idiot > brother is developing iOS apps. So there's lots of talk about the > relatively new platform. By contrast, C (and C++) is much better > understood, and I'd guess that the relative amount of chatter is lower > compared to the amount of actual work being done. This argument would make sense if C was lower on the Tiobe index than Objective-C but it is not. So the metrics that the Tiobe index uses show that C is still widely discussed (and by extension) widely used. In fact as the link I posted above shows C is the most discussed language on the web, ahead of Java, Objective-C and C++ (and everything else besides).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-24 13:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <wJednRuCfpsaJqrNnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@bestweb.net> |
| In reply to | #24769 |
On 8/23/2012 1:43 PM, Kenny McCormack wrote: > In article <k15q2u$dhh$3@news.xmission.com>, > Kenny McCormack <gazelle@shell.xmission.com> wrote: > .... >> Q: What exactly do we mean when we say that language A is more "popular" >> than language B? > > I suggest that the most common interpretation of this question is: > > Q: What language should I study in school to maximize my chances of getting > a job? Q: If it's more likely that I can get a job with language X, but getting a job with language Y pays more, which language should I study? -- Kenneth Brody
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Smallshaw <andrews@sdf.lonestar.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-27 06:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn3vfsk3m3gp.a2r.andrews@sdf.lonestar.org> |
| In reply to | #24863 |
On 2012-08-24, Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> wrote: > On 8/23/2012 1:43 PM, Kenny McCormack wrote: >> >> I suggest that the most common interpretation of this question is: >> >> Q: What language should I study in school to maximize my chances of getting >> a job? > > Q: If it's more likely that I can get a job with language X, but getting a > job with language Y pays more, which language should I study? Good point. Another would be the longevity of the language. Five or ten years ago there were any number of VB programming jobs out there typically offering salaries not much more than what an average network technician can command. I've no concrete evidence to back this up but my impression is that the number of adverts has dropped at least an order of magnitude from its peak. PHP seems to be the current flavour of the month. -- Andrew Smallshaw andrews@sdf.lonestar.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-23 12:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7a008db9-927f-492c-8d94-4db0dcea0559@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #24767 |
בתאריך יום חמישי, 23 באוגוסט 2012 18:42:54 UTC+1, מאת Kenny McCormack: > In article <k15pvn$fhj$2@speranza.aioe.org>, > > Q: What exactly do we mean when we say that language A is more "popular" > than language B? > > We don't mean anything exactly. There are several metrics which could could use and defend. The number of programmers using the language, the number of lines of code in existence, the number of programs written in the language, the number of programmer hours spent with the language, the number of paid programmer hours, the number of voluntary programmer hours (with few external pressures to use other languages). But most of these will give similar results.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-29 21:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k1lsul$8h3$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #24767 |
Kenny McCormack wrote: > Q: What exactly do we mean when we say that language A is more "popular" > than language B? I'm not in the position to state what you believe, but I can speak for myself and provide a definition for "popular" in this context which I believe is appropriate. As the word "popular" refers to something that is regarded with favour or approval by people in general, then, as a programming language is supposed to be a tool used by programmers to actually write software, a good yardstick for the popularity of a programming language is how widespread is its use to actually develop programs. A couple of ways which adequately evaluate this are: a) the number of programs which are developed, completely or in part, with it b) the demand for programmers who are skilled in it A quick search in monster.com for ads listing Objective-C as a required skill returns 417 results.[1] Meanwhile, there are 1000 ads looking for C++[2] or C[3] programmers, and I suspect that the site caps search results at 1000 hits. To me, this information is more meaningful than the number of times a certain string is found in a random blog. Rui Maciel [1] http://jobsearch.monster.com/search/?q=Objective__2DC-Programming- Language [2] http://jobsearch.monster.com/search/?q=C__2B__2B-Programming-Language [3] http://jobsearch.monster.com/search/?q=C-Programming-Language
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-23 21:23 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <k15vvg$vqr$5@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #24752 |
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 08:43:39 -0700 (PDT) fmassei@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, August 23, 2012 5:23:01 PM UTC+2, Vincenzo Mercuri wrote: > > Il 8/23/2012 3:49 PM, Chicken McNuggets ha scritto: > > > > > On 23/08/2012 14:32, Robert Wessel wrote: > > > > >> Outside the Apple world, the use of Objective-C relative to C++ > > >> appears to be miniscule, bordering on the non-existent. > > > > > > > According to the Tiobe language index for August 2012 it is the > > > third most popular language (ahead of C++). > > > > > > http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html > > > > > > > > That doesn't prove that Objective-C is as popular outside the Apple > > world. > > > > Given this data, I'd say that the Apple-world is more popular than C++ > > Ciao! What Objective C applications exists on other platforms except apple? -- drwx------ 2 bmaxa bmaxa 4096 Aug 23 21:21 .
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-23 18:37 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k15pot$fhj$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #24749 |
Chicken McNuggets wrote: > According to the Tiobe language index for August 2012 it is the third > most popular language (ahead of C++). > > http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html That index is meaningless. For example, it tries to account the popularity of a given programming language by counting the number of videos on youtube that pop out on a given search. http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/tpci_definition.htm Meanwhile, a search on sourceforge for C++ returns 1632 results[1], while a search on Objective C returns 66[2]. Rui Maciel [1] http://sourceforge.net/directory/language:c%2B%2B/ [2] http://sourceforge.net/directory/language:objective-c/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-23 21:19 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <k15vn6$vqr$3@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #24749 |
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:49:38 +0100 Chicken McNuggets <chicken@mcnuggets.com> wrote: > On 23/08/2012 14:32, Robert Wessel wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:49:35 +0100, Chicken McNuggets > > <chicken@mcnuggets.com> wrote: > > > >> On 22/08/2012 21:56, Robert Wessel wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> *Objective C would have a similar high level of C compatibility as > >>> C++, for example, but I think you'd be hard pressed to consider > >>> that as sufficiently mainstream. > >>> > >> > >> I'm not so sure. Objective-C is growing in popularity all the > >> time. It has the advantage that any valid C program is a valid > >> Objective-C program and can also use C++ classes directly via > >> Objective-C++. Sounds like a win / win situation to me. > > > > > > Outside the Apple world, the use of Objective-C relative to C++ > > appears to be miniscule, bordering on the non-existent. > > > > According to the Tiobe language index for August 2012 it is the third > most popular language (ahead of C++). > > http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html Hm. Besides OOlite I don;t know any other application that uses Objective C on Linux (or for that matter Windows). -- drwx------ 2 bmaxa bmaxa 4096 Aug 23 21:15 .
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-25 02:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6e12f85f-5450-4404-b0e7-6860b2aeb56c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #24748 |
robert...@yahoo.com於 2012年8月23日星期四UTC+8下午9時32分02秒寫道： > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:49:35 +0100, Chicken McNuggets > > <chicken@mcnuggets.com> wrote: > > > > >On 22/08/2012 21:56, Robert Wessel wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> *Objective C would have a similar high level of C compatibility as > > >> C++, for example, but I think you'd be hard pressed to consider that > > >> as sufficiently mainstream. > > >> > > > > > >I'm not so sure. Objective-C is growing in popularity all the time. It > > >has the advantage that any valid C program is a valid Objective-C > > >program and can also use C++ classes directly via Objective-C++. Sounds > > >like a win / win situation to me. > > > Well, the IOS and ARM or BCM CPUS are not selling in the Wintel business model. The objective C can be pick up very fast by professional C / C++ programmers. > > Outside the Apple world, the use of Objective-C relative to C++ > > appears to be miniscule, bordering on the non-existent.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-23 21:15 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <k15vh6$vqr$2@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #24746 |
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:49:35 +0100 Chicken McNuggets <chicken@mcnuggets.com> wrote: > On 22/08/2012 21:56, Robert Wessel wrote: > > > > > *Objective C would have a similar high level of C compatibility as > > C++, for example, but I think you'd be hard pressed to consider that > > as sufficiently mainstream. > > > > I'm not so sure. Objective-C is growing in popularity all the time. > It has the advantage that any valid C program is a valid Objective-C > program and can also use C++ classes directly via Objective-C++. > Sounds like a win / win situation to me. What are advantages of Objective C over C++? -- drwx------ 2 bmaxa bmaxa 4096 Aug 23 21:14 .
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c
csiph-web