Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #24771 > unrolled thread
| Started by | jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-08-23 20:05 +0200 |
| Last post | 2012-09-13 20:39 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 386 — 52 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c
Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-23 20:05 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-23 20:28 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 21:06 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-08-23 12:44 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-23 22:14 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Don't make my brown eyes China Blue <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-23 14:15 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2012-08-23 22:07 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2012-08-23 16:20 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-23 22:51 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Daniel Weber <usenet@daniel-weber.eu> - 2012-08-24 09:33 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-24 09:51 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Daniel Weber <usenet@daniel-weber.eu> - 2012-08-24 13:30 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-24 13:32 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Daniel Weber <usenet@daniel-weber.eu> - 2012-08-24 13:46 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-08-24 15:44 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language ozbear@bigpond.com (ozbear) - 2012-08-26 02:22 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-08-26 00:19 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language ozbear@bigpond.com (ozbear) - 2012-08-27 00:25 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Don't make my brown eyes China Blue <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-23 13:51 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language CRNG <Spam@uce.gov> - 2012-08-23 16:57 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-23 18:01 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-08-23 15:21 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-23 19:04 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-23 23:26 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-23 19:14 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-24 11:35 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-24 21:03 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-24 18:46 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-24 21:13 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-24 21:08 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-25 10:41 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-25 10:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-25 22:35 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-26 02:17 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-26 02:58 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-08-26 15:32 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> - 2012-09-01 23:02 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Leo Havmøller <rtxleh@nospam.nospam> - 2012-08-24 06:52 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-24 09:00 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-23 23:16 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Don't make my brown eyes China Blue <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-24 00:06 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-24 09:18 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Leo Havmøller <rtxleh@nospam.nospam> - 2012-08-24 09:22 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-24 09:53 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-24 03:48 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-08-24 15:28 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 10:20 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-25 22:43 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-25 03:30 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> - 2012-09-01 23:11 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> - 2012-09-01 23:10 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 10:16 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-08-25 02:45 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 10:58 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-25 23:02 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Adrian Ratnapala <adrian.ratnapala@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 02:59 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-08-25 05:28 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Adrian Ratnapala <adrian.ratnapala@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 07:45 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-08-25 12:12 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-08-25 05:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-08-25 16:57 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-25 23:22 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-08-26 10:46 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-25 11:00 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-25 23:31 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-26 01:57 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-08-25 13:58 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-25 23:36 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-25 22:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-08-26 10:42 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-26 04:27 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Chicken McNuggets <chicken@mcnuggets.com> - 2012-09-01 11:35 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-09-02 00:52 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> - 2012-09-01 23:21 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-25 23:16 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-25 22:59 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-25 22:55 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-24 00:45 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-24 04:17 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-24 04:47 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-08-24 06:33 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-25 06:47 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-25 23:58 -0600
Alternatives to Windows APIs in Metro style apps "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-24 04:20 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language superpollo <superpollo@tznvy.pbz> - 2012-08-24 12:38 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language rashid <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-08-25 21:09 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-26 01:40 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language rashid <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-08-27 20:58 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-27 17:12 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-27 22:25 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-27 15:03 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-27 15:35 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-28 01:13 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-28 01:30 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-27 22:46 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-28 09:12 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> - 2012-09-01 23:26 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-09-02 09:59 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> - 2012-09-02 02:44 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-09-02 11:40 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-02 03:10 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> - 2012-09-02 05:05 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-09-03 00:32 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-03 01:16 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-29 01:03 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-27 22:28 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language rashid <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-08-28 18:25 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Anders Wegge Keller <wegge@wegge.dk> - 2012-08-28 20:35 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2012-08-28 11:55 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-28 21:11 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-28 21:39 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2012-08-28 22:29 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-28 23:09 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2012-08-28 23:16 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-28 23:27 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-28 17:24 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-28 23:37 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-28 14:37 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-28 23:39 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-29 00:15 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-29 01:54 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-28 17:15 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-29 02:27 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-08-29 10:01 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-29 10:54 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-08-29 13:47 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-08-29 07:57 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-29 16:20 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-08-29 12:32 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-29 20:28 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-29 14:51 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-29 21:11 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-29 15:32 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-29 21:47 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-29 23:01 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca> - 2012-08-29 19:27 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-29 21:30 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-29 15:44 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca> - 2012-08-29 20:07 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-29 23:06 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-08-29 08:21 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-29 15:37 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-29 15:59 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-29 16:27 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-29 11:02 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-29 11:42 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-29 14:52 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-29 07:27 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language rashid <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-08-29 20:00 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-29 16:36 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-29 23:12 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-08-29 21:47 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-29 17:51 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-30 03:07 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-29 21:38 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-30 11:40 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-30 04:00 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-30 13:55 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-30 13:47 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-30 23:24 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-08-30 02:40 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-29 17:46 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Don't make my brown eyes China Blue <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-29 18:25 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-30 13:43 +1200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-08-30 03:37 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-30 08:28 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-31 05:29 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-31 11:57 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-30 14:20 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Don't make my brown eyes China Blue <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-30 06:39 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-30 20:08 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-30 22:51 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-31 01:04 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-31 11:42 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Don't make my brown eyes China Blue <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-30 16:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-31 12:29 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Don't make my brown eyes China Blue <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-31 04:40 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2012-08-31 17:26 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Don't make my brown eyes China Blue <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-31 08:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-08-31 12:46 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Anders Wegge Keller <wegge@wegge.dk> - 2012-08-31 20:17 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-31 14:41 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Anders Wegge Keller <wegge@wegge.dk> - 2012-09-01 00:11 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-09-02 12:48 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Anders Wegge Keller <wegge@wegge.dk> - 2012-09-02 20:39 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Don't make my brown eyes China Blue <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-02 17:07 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-09-03 12:22 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-09-02 20:49 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-02 18:58 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Paul J Gans <gansno@panix.com> - 2012-09-03 02:15 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-02 22:10 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-09-03 10:16 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-09-03 12:10 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-03 13:06 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-09-04 12:16 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-04 12:24 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-09-04 20:14 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-09-04 17:38 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Edek Pienkowski <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> - 2012-09-04 19:34 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-04 16:46 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Edek Pienkowski <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> - 2012-09-05 08:26 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-09-02 13:40 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-09-02 15:30 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-09-02 16:05 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-09-02 17:01 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-09-02 17:21 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-09-02 21:17 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-09-03 00:24 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-09-02 18:06 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-03 11:07 +1200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-09-02 18:36 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-09-02 20:38 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-09-02 20:00 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-09-03 11:25 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-09-03 11:52 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-31 11:56 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-09-01 13:45 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-01 12:29 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> - 2012-09-01 22:47 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-02 12:41 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> - 2012-09-01 22:46 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Don't make my brown eyes China Blue <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-31 14:08 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-01 11:54 +1200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-09-02 20:05 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-03 08:55 +1200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-09-03 11:43 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-04 09:25 +1200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-09-04 17:50 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-09-04 19:32 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-09-04 22:58 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-09-04 22:09 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-05 10:13 +1200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-09-05 08:59 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-05 07:57 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-06 17:30 +1200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-06 13:16 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-07 07:13 +1200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-06 21:25 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-06 15:18 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-07 00:42 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-09-07 11:28 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-07 22:44 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-09-07 18:59 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-08 01:10 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-09-07 22:45 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-08 05:18 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-08 14:29 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Don't make my brown eyes China Blue <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-08 07:16 -0700
Re: Reâ: â¬Microsoft abandons the C language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-08 15:58 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-08 17:39 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-08 10:21 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-08 22:29 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-08 15:04 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-09 00:24 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-07 20:47 +1200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-06 17:22 +1200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-06 13:12 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language ImpalerCore <jadill33@gmail.com> - 2012-09-06 08:51 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-06 16:57 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-07 19:40 +0300
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-07 22:46 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language lawrence.jones@siemens.com - 2012-09-10 17:02 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-09-10 22:49 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language lawrence.jones@siemens.com - 2012-09-11 11:13 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-09-10 22:44 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-07 07:18 +1200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-06 21:11 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-06 16:57 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-07 02:27 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-09-06 15:40 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-09-08 09:54 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Don't make my brown eyes China Blue <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-08 01:23 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-09-10 10:48 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-02 14:29 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-09-03 11:49 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-02 15:15 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-31 21:58 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Don't make my brown eyes China Blue <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-31 14:02 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-09-02 12:55 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-09-02 19:21 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> - 2012-09-01 22:44 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Don't make my brown eyes China Blue <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-01 21:56 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> - 2012-09-02 01:48 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-03 02:04 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-09-02 19:07 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2012-08-31 11:57 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-08-31 11:05 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-08-31 21:10 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-31 11:54 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-30 08:02 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-28 14:57 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language superpollo <superpollo@tznvy.pbz> - 2012-08-28 21:19 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language ais523 <ais523@bham.ac.uk> - 2012-08-28 22:07 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-28 14:36 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-29 09:40 +1200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-28 17:13 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-29 01:01 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-29 22:26 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Chicken McNuggets <chicken@mcnuggets.com> - 2012-09-02 12:28 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-25 16:48 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language timprince <tprince@computer.org> - 2012-08-25 23:20 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-25 20:55 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-26 02:24 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-26 10:45 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-26 03:13 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Tim Prince <tprince@nospamcomputer.org> - 2012-08-26 11:01 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-26 13:53 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-26 21:54 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-26 22:46 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-27 08:52 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-27 01:16 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-27 11:24 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-27 04:07 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-08-27 13:09 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-08-27 09:17 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-08-27 16:36 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-27 22:02 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-27 22:18 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-08-28 13:14 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-28 10:03 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language lawrence.jones@siemens.com - 2012-08-31 17:44 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> - 2012-09-02 01:12 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-09-03 11:39 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-09-03 11:22 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-09-03 12:54 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-28 19:47 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> - 2012-09-02 01:34 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-27 01:26 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-27 02:53 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> - 2012-09-02 01:36 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-02 03:17 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> - 2012-09-02 04:37 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-26 00:35 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-26 11:00 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-26 03:16 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-08-26 11:06 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-26 05:02 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-26 15:14 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language superpollo <superpollo@tznvy.pbz> - 2012-08-26 15:22 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-26 22:35 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> - 2012-09-02 01:38 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language s0suk3@gmail.com - 2012-08-27 10:56 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-08-27 21:21 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2012-08-28 02:42 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language s0suk3@gmail.com - 2012-08-27 20:02 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-08-28 10:51 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-08-28 03:52 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-08-28 12:47 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2012-08-28 18:25 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language s0suk3@gmail.com - 2012-08-29 11:25 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-08-26 11:06 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-26 22:01 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-29 07:33 -0400
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-26 00:13 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-08-26 11:17 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-08-26 14:22 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-26 22:30 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2012-08-26 22:43 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-27 00:32 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2012-08-27 01:02 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-27 01:42 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-27 03:00 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-28 10:49 +0100
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-28 04:14 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-28 04:18 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-08-27 10:56 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-27 03:40 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2012-08-27 04:05 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-08-27 15:13 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-27 23:47 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-28 09:16 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-28 01:48 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language BruceS <bruces42@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-28 14:10 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-08-28 17:14 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> - 2012-09-02 01:45 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-09-02 10:01 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> - 2012-09-02 02:54 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-08-27 13:45 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-27 23:28 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-08-27 13:58 -0500
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> - 2012-08-28 00:20 -0600
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Adrian Ratnapala <adrian.ratnapala@gmail.com> - 2012-08-26 15:24 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Jens Stuckelberger <Jens_Stuckelberger@nowhere.net> - 2012-08-27 00:48 +0000
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-09-13 19:46 +0200
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2012-09-13 13:32 -0700
Re: Microsoft abandons the C language Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-09-13 20:39 +0000
Page 5 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 20 Next page →
| From | Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-24 06:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <k17ogm$b0h$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #24837 |
Ansel wrote: > Ansel wrote: > >> I really don't see the hullabuloo about Metro apps. Some >> applications/platforms fit the model, others don't. I haven't >> investigated it much, but Metro seems to be a smart phone GUI put on >> the desktop, which sounds like a very dumb idea. On a phone, or >> tablet maybe, but on a desktop? > > Further, if one has an operating system product line, and they have a > paradigm they call "deskop apps" and another called "Metro-style apps", > shouldn't users conclude that "desktop apps" are for desktop computers and > that "Metro-style" apps are for some other type of computer and that an OS > that presents itself in "Metro-style" is not an OS meant for a desktop > computer? Does MS employ any analysts? If so, they should try using > consultants instead! > > Ya think? :) Nail, meet head. -- Les Cargill
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-25 06:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bf273bb5-a168-408f-8e27-b6d645945893@r4g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #24833 |
On Aug 24, 11:17 am, "Ansel" <tinker...@trytospammenowloser.com> wrote: > Nick Keighley wrote: > > On Aug 23, 7:05 pm, jacob navia <ja...@spamsink.net> wrote: > >> 2) Say goodbye to the console. Metro style apps are GUI only; they > >> don't support console. Goodbye stdin, stderr, stdout. > > > ;-( :-( > > > I write console applications all the time to try things out! Little > > utilities launched from the desktop etc. > > You can still write console apps in Win8. > > > > > no Win32 interface at all? Maybe I will have to switch to Linux after > > all. > > Win32 is still there, but just a subset of it is callable from Metro apps. > > I really don't see the hullabuloo about Metro apps. Some > applications/platforms fit the model, others don't. I haven't investigated > it much, but Metro seems to be a smart phone GUI put on the desktop, which > sounds like a very dumb idea. On a phone, or tablet maybe, but on a desktop? > Surely that showing of that coffee table interface where one could move > stuff around with their hands because the surface was a touch screen has > something to do with this (read, Bill Gate's ego). MS seems to be just a > bunch of propeller heads after the Win 8 UI fiasco. > > But then again, the first thing I do after installing the latest and > "greatest" version of Windows and after playing around with the "new and > improved" GUI for a bit, is go looking for the same classic GUI I've been > using since Win 95, so it may be just me. Heck, maybe y'all have abandoned > your desktops for your smartphone ages ago, or don't even know what one of > those desktop (computer) things is! I don't even have a smartphone. The last > thing I want when I'm away from my computer, is to be away WITH another > computer! > > I got off the MS bandwagon of "new-and-improved" technologies early. The > first incling I had of their strategy is when they came out with DDE and > then everything in their arsenal had to have 'DDE' in the name. Then it was > OLE. COM. MFC, .Net, WinRT, Metro... it never ends. I feel very lucky that I > haven't spent much time on learning MS-proprietary technologies. yeah I skipped most of them too. I've recently had to do a bit of COM. Not too bad if you wrap up well
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-25 23:58 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k1ceq0$5rh$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #24911 |
Nick Keighley wrote: > On Aug 24, 11:17 am, "Ansel" <tinker...@trytospammenowloser.com> > wrote: >> I got off the MS bandwagon of "new-and-improved" technologies early. >> The first incling I had of their strategy is when they came out with >> DDE and then everything in their arsenal had to have 'DDE' in the >> name. Then it was OLE. COM. MFC, .Net, WinRT, Metro... it never >> ends. I feel very lucky that I haven't spent much time on learning >> MS-proprietary technologies. > > yeah I skipped most of them too. I've recently had to do a bit of COM. > Not too bad if you wrap up well At least COM has implementation on other platforms. Though I've researched it a few times out of curiosity, I have never programmed to it. I was never at a position to package and offer components for Windows that would be useable to those using any Windows-supported language. I dismissed COM as being for the development of cross-language Windows components. I just don't find it any fun working with MS technologies either. I prefer to write the things that get wrapped-up with those things (until I create my own you-wrap-it-up-in-this technologies?)--that is *real* code! I'm "sure" COM is still a lower-level technology upon which even Metro underpinnings are built.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-24 04:20 -0600 |
| Subject | Alternatives to Windows APIs in Metro style apps |
| Message-ID | <k17kfg$b9u$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #24771 |
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/hh464945%28v=VS.85%29.aspx
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | superpollo <superpollo@tznvy.pbz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-24 12:38 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <5037599f$0$17951$4fafbaef@reader1.news.tin.it> |
| In reply to | #24771 |
jacob navia ha scritto: ... > Phew! do these guys http://mxe.cc know? bye
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rashid <nospam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-25 21:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <k1bete$7qc$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #24771 |
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 20:05:20 +0200, jacob navia wrote: > This is a long story. It starts years ago since windows 3.1 and it ends > now, with "Metro". [cut] Dude you are a crazy. MS is a great friend of C. They have put C/C++ at the center of Windows development for 25 years. They sold more C/C++ compilers than anyone. They produce their own software in C/C++. All their MFC .NET etc is built right on top of C/C++. You and all the other crazy MS haters should get a life. C would not have survived as a successful language without the great support of MS across many years!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-26 01:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <50396253.4040309@loria.fr> |
| In reply to | #24955 |
Am 25.08.2012 23:09, schrieb rashid: > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 20:05:20 +0200, jacob navia wrote: > >> This is a long story. It starts years ago since windows 3.1 and it ends >> now, with "Metro". > MS is a great friend of C. such a great friend that they refused to support the successive standards since 1999 > They have put C/C++ at the center of Windows > development for 25 years. They sold more C/C++ compilers than anyone. > They produce their own software in C/C++. All their MFC .NET etc is built > right on top of C/C++. There is no such thing like C/C++. > You and all the other crazy MS haters should get a life. C would not have > survived as a successful language without the great support of MS across > many years! Ah, now I see you are joking :) Jens
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rashid <nospam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-27 20:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <k1gn13$tij$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #24961 |
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 01:40:03 +0200, Jens Gustedt wrote: > Am 25.08.2012 23:09, schrieb rashid: >> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 20:05:20 +0200, jacob navia wrote: >> >>> This is a long story. It starts years ago since windows 3.1 and it >>> ends now, with "Metro". > >> MS is a great friend of C. > > such a great friend that they refused to support the successive > standards since 1999 Sorry this is garbage. MSVC supports all C/C++ standards, also extra features (eg C++ style // comments will be accepted in C programs too) >> They have put C/C++ at the center of Windows development for 25 years. >> They sold more C/C++ compilers than anyone. They produce their own >> software in C/C++. All their MFC .NET etc is built right on top of >> C/C++. > > There is no such thing like C/C++. ??? Are you a crazy? Or you only use JAVA? __Most__ modern software development relies on C/C++. >> You and all the other crazy MS haters should get a life. C would not >> have survived as a successful language without the great support of MS >> across many years! > > Ah, now I see you are joking :) No you are the joking clown, you and all the MS haters. You want the Linux? Go and use the Linux and be happy. But please do not spread stupid lies about MS. Thank you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-27 17:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <503BE2A2.3030708@verizon.net> |
| In reply to | #25136 |
On 08/27/2012 04:58 PM, rashid wrote: > On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 01:40:03 +0200, Jens Gustedt wrote: >> Am 25.08.2012 23:09, schrieb rashid: >>> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 20:05:20 +0200, jacob navia wrote: >>> >>>> This is a long story. It starts years ago since windows 3.1 and it >>>> ends now, with "Metro". >> >>> MS is a great friend of C. >> >> such a great friend that they refused to support the successive >> standards since 1999 > > Sorry this is garbage. MSVC supports all C/C++ standards, also extra > features (eg C++ style // comments will be accepted in C programs too) They've never even fully adopted C99; they've barely even started to support it, 13 years after original adoption. >>> They have put C/C++ at the center of Windows development for 25 years. >>> They sold more C/C++ compilers than anyone. They produce their own >>> software in C/C++. All their MFC .NET etc is built right on top of >>> C/C++. >> >> There is no such thing like C/C++. > > ??? Are you a crazy? Or you only use JAVA? __Most__ modern software > development relies on C/C++. No, it does not. A lot of it relies on a language called C, and a lot of it relies on another language called C++. However, the existence of a language called C/C++ is a common confusion that has nothing to do with reality. It often co-exists with the somewhat better-justified, but still erroneous, belief that C is a subset of C++. >>> You and all the other crazy MS haters should get a life. C would not >>> have survived as a successful language without the great support of MS >>> across many years! >> >> Ah, now I see you are joking :) > > No you are the joking clown, you and all the MS haters. You want the > Linux? Go and use the Linux and be happy. But please do not spread stupid > lies about MS. MS C compilers have never supported more than a tiny sub-set of the changes that were made in C99. You can call that "support" if you want to, but I don't see how you could possibly call that "great support".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-27 22:25 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k1hh60$hu9$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #25138 |
James Kuyper wrote: > On 08/27/2012 04:58 PM, rashid wrote: >> On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 01:40:03 +0200, Jens Gustedt wrote: >>> Am 25.08.2012 23:09, schrieb rashid: >>>> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 20:05:20 +0200, jacob navia wrote: >>>> >>>>> This is a long story. It starts years ago since windows 3.1 and it >>>>> ends now, with "Metro". >>> >>>> MS is a great friend of C. >>> >>> such a great friend that they refused to support the successive >>> standards since 1999 >> >> Sorry this is garbage. MSVC supports all C/C++ standards, also extra >> features (eg C++ style // comments will be accepted in C programs >> too) > > They've never even fully adopted C99; they've barely even started to > support it, 13 years after original adoption. To which I say, and have been saying in this thread: so what?! They went to your church and didn't become <whatever your religion is> and now you are pissed off? Well now, isn't your religion, "nice". Is it that you want MS to bless your holy standard so that it can ride on MS's coattail? >>>> You and all the other crazy MS haters should get a life. C would >>>> not have survived as a successful language without the great >>>> support of MS across many years! >>> >>> Ah, now I see you are joking :) >> >> No you are the joking clown, you and all the MS haters. You want the >> Linux? Go and use the Linux and be happy. But please do not spread >> stupid lies about MS. > > MS C compilers have never supported more than a tiny sub-set of the > changes that were made in C99. So what?! > You can call that "support" if you want > to, but I don't see how you could possibly call that "great support".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-27 15:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ln4nnoc7ru.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> |
| In reply to | #25136 |
[Dropping comp.compilers.lcc, since this has nothing to do with the lcc
or lcc-win compiler]
rashid <nospam@nospam.com> writes:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 01:40:03 +0200, Jens Gustedt wrote:
>> Am 25.08.2012 23:09, schrieb rashid:
>>> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 20:05:20 +0200, jacob navia wrote:
>>>> This is a long story. It starts years ago since windows 3.1 and it
>>>> ends now, with "Metro".
>>
>>> MS is a great friend of C.
>>
>> such a great friend that they refused to support the successive
>> standards since 1999
>
> Sorry this is garbage. MSVC supports all C/C++ standards, also extra
> features (eg C++ style // comments will be accepted in C programs too)
You are mistaken. MSVS's support for C90 is reasonably good; their
support for C99 and C11 is nearly nonexistent, and deliberately so.
You probably have a newer version of MSVC than I do. Try compiling
this program, which is strictly conforming under the 12-year-old
C99 standard. (You can expect some warnings about unused variables,
if the compiler gets that far.)
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <complex.h>
#include <stdint.h>
inline void foo(uint32_t *restrict p) {
}
int main(void) {
bool b = false;
int size = 20;
uint32_t vla[size];
double complex x;
foo(vla);
return 0;
}
I don't know how well MSVC supports the various versions of the C++
standard. My guess (and it's no more than that) is that they're working
on C++11 support.
[...]
>> There is no such thing like C/C++.
>
> ??? Are you a crazy? Or you only use JAVA? __Most__ modern software
> development relies on C/C++.
Perhaps this is just a confusion about terminology.
Some people use the term "C/C++" to mean "C and C++", or "C or C++". In
that sense, of course both languages exist (even if they're not fully
supported by some compilers).
Others use the term "C/C++" as if it were a single language. The point
we're making is that C and C++ are two distinct (but closely related)
languages, and the term "C/C++" tends to obscure that fact.
If you mean that most modern software development relies on C and C++, I
won't argue. I'm not sure that's correct, but I haven't looked into the
relative popularity of C vs. C++ vs. other languages. If you mean that
"C/C++" is some single thing, it isn't.
[...]
> No you are the joking clown, you and all the MS haters. You want the
> Linux? Go and use the Linux and be happy. But please do not spread stupid
> lies about MS.
>
> Thank you.
Even if you're right, you really should be more polite. Being
simultaneously rude and wrong is not good for your reputation here.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Will write code for food.
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-27 15:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <lnharoarqa.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> |
| In reply to | #25140 |
Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> writes:
> rashid <nospam@nospam.com> writes:
[...]
>> Sorry this is garbage. MSVC supports all C/C++ standards, also extra
>> features (eg C++ style // comments will be accepted in C programs too)
>
> You are mistaken. MSVS's support for C90 is reasonably good; their
> support for C99 and C11 is nearly nonexistent, and deliberately so.
[...]
Here's a citation for that:
http://herbsutter.com/2012/05/03/reader-qa-what-about-vc-and-c99/
"We do not plan to support ISO C features that are not part of either
C90 or ISO C++." -- Herb Sutter, speaking for Microsoft
And if you want to argue that C90 support verifies your claim, here's
a quotation from the ISO C99 standard:
This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition, ISO/IEC
9899:1990, as amended and corrected by ISO/IEC 9899/COR1:1994,
ISO/IEC 9899/AMD1:1995, and ISO/IEC 9899/COR2:1996.
and another from (the N1570 draft of) the ISO C11 standard:
This third edition cancels and replaces the second edition,
ISO/IEC 9899:1999, as corrected by ISO/IEC 9899:1999/Cor
1:2001, ISO/IEC 9899:1999/Cor 2:2004, and ISO/IEC 9899:1999/Cor
3:2007.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Will write code for food.
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-28 01:13 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <k1guu3$gg1$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #25147 |
Le 28/08/12 00:35, Keith Thompson a écrit : > here's > a quotation from the ISO C99 standard: > > This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition, ISO/IEC > 9899:1990, as amended and corrected by ISO/IEC 9899/COR1:1994, > ISO/IEC 9899/AMD1:1995, and ISO/IEC 9899/COR2:1996. Interesting Mr Thompson. I remember that I cited the same paragraph in this same group some years ago, and I was flamed by Mr Heathfield and the other regulars that maintained that "standard c" means C90 (As microsoft does now). Well, better late than never! P.S. Specifically here is a message that I wrote around November 28, 2009, and your answer below: > > > »This second edition cancels and replaces the first > > edition, ISO/IEC 9899:1990, as amended and corrected by > > ISO/IEC 9899/COR1:1994, ISO/IEC 9899/AMD1:1995, and > > ISO/IEC 9899/COR2:1996.« > > > ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (E) > > > This means that C is the language specified by ISO/IEC > > 9899:1999 (E). »ISO/IEC 9899:1990« is canceled. > > In theory, yes. In practice, conforming C90 compilers are still > much more common than conforming C99 compilers. Many compilers > implement large parts of C99, but others, still in common use, > implement almost none of it (more precisely, almost none of the > differences between C90 and C99). > > -- > Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks...@mib.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-28 01:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <k1gvtv$icu$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #25150 |
Le 28/08/12 01:13, jacob navia a écrit : > Le 28/08/12 00:35, Keith Thompson a écrit : >> here's >> a quotation from the ISO C99 standard: >> >> This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition, ISO/IEC >> 9899:1990, as amended and corrected by ISO/IEC 9899/COR1:1994, >> ISO/IEC 9899/AMD1:1995, and ISO/IEC 9899/COR2:1996. > > > Interesting Mr Thompson. > > I remember that I cited the same paragraph in this same group some > years ago, and I was flamed by Mr Heathfield and the other regulars > that maintained that "standard c" means C90 (As microsoft does now). > > Well, better late than never! > Look for instance another one from heathfield: (Dec 15 2006) jacob navia said: <snip> [jacob navia] > The current standard is C99, and that standard makes > older standards obsolete. [heathfield] If that is true, then your own implementation is obsolete, since it doesn't conform to C99. In practice, of course, C90 *is* the C Standard, no matter what ISO say, and C99 is what will eventually replace it *only* if sufficient people can be bothered to write conforming C99 implementations - which almost nobody has seen fit to do, up to now. -- Richard Heathfield "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999 http://www.cpax.org.uk email: rjh at the above domain, - www. ----------------------------------------------------- Ahh, and I will hide the posts of Mark McIntyre (happily he disappeared from here, as heathfield and some others I would rather forget)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ansel" <tinker454@trytospammenowloser.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-27 22:46 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k1hidg$kag$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #25150 |
jacob navia wrote: > Le 28/08/12 00:35, Keith Thompson a écrit : >> here's >> a quotation from the ISO C99 standard: >> >> This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition, >> ISO/IEC 9899:1990, as amended and corrected by ISO/IEC >> 9899/COR1:1994, ISO/IEC 9899/AMD1:1995, and ISO/IEC >> 9899/COR2:1996. > > > Interesting Mr Thompson. > > I remember that I cited the same paragraph in this same group some > years ago, and I was flamed by Mr Heathfield and the other regulars > that maintained that "standard c" means C90 (As microsoft does now). > > Well, better late than never! > > P.S. > Specifically here is a message that I wrote around November 28, 2009, > and your answer below: > Shouldn't you be diligently preparing for your debut performance at the committee meeting just 4 weeks away instead of "I, I, I-ing" in here? Maybe take the next week off and/or eliminate/minimize anything that may hinder your performance and then turn off your USENET/forum connections for the next 3 and immerse yourself in your cause? And stop with the "oh I need plane fair.. blah, blah", for that will hurt your cause immensely I think. You buy the best webcam you can afford, set up an office where you live, tell everyone else in the house to be quiet (or send them all off to the in-laws) while you practice your presentation and get the technology working with aplomb. You have 3 weeks until the big day. Stop procrastinating. That said, will you be using a slide-deck? Powerpoint? Throw it on up here (or other place/way)--I promise to "tear it to shreds" (I promise to not be nice). (Note, I do not want to read your detailed papers and such).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-28 09:12 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <503C6F55.8010309@loria.fr> |
| In reply to | #25182 |
Am 28.08.2012 06:46, schrieb Ansel: > Throw it on up here > (or other place/way)--I promise to "tear it to shreds" (I promise to not be > nice). (Note, I do not want to read your detailed papers and such). Interesting, if this isn't a declaration of war, I don't know what would be. Good to know in what spirit you are. Makes discussions effectively quite useless. Jens
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-09-01 23:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k1uql3$tej$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #25195 |
Jens Gustedt wrote: > Am 28.08.2012 06:46, schrieb Ansel: > >> Throw it on up here >> (or other place/way)--I promise to "tear it to shreds" (I promise to >> not be nice). (Note, I do not want to read your detailed papers and >> such). > > Interesting, if this isn't a declaration of war, I don't know what > would be. Good to know in what spirit you are. Makes discussions > effectively quite useless. > I was trying to help the flailing duck and you call me a hunter? Aren't you the one who shot him to begin with? Oh wait, don't tell me, I've just run into Ted Nugent? Guitar "hero" still trying to make good on adolescnt wanking Ted? That said, doesn't that Mittens Romeny underling look like a bat? And halloween is coming up!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-09-02 09:59 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <504311EB.7090201@loria.fr> |
| In reply to | #25732 |
Am 02.09.2012 07:26, schrieb Anse: > I ah, so you got yourself a new alias, suspected that you would come up with something like this. Good to know that these tow are the same. > was trying to help the flailing duck and you call me a hunter? ah, so your statement was ironic? Is that it? You were joking? > Aren't you the one who shot him to begin with? Oh wait, don't tell > me, I've just run into Ted Nugent? Guitar "hero" still trying to > make good on adolescnt wanking Ted? sorry, I am not able to follow you here. English is neither my native tongue nor culture. I suspect there are several levels of irony in your interjection, but I simply don't have the cultural reference to follow you. And to be able to catch up to your level is far beyond my possibilities, joking in a foreign language is extremely difficult. > That said, doesn't that Mittens Romeny underling look like a bat? And > halloween is coming up!! same here Jens
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Anse" <blankone23@framebuilder.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-09-02 02:44 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k1v679$lqn$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #25739 |
Jens Gustedt wrote: > Am 02.09.2012 07:26, schrieb Anse: >> I > > ah, so you got yourself a new alias, suspected that you would come up > with something like this. Good to know that these tow are the same. You still grasp at me even after I said I am not "your leader"? It sucks for me when it is quiet. It only sucks more when it is not. > >> was trying to help the flailing duck and you call me a hunter? > > ah, so your statement was ironic? Is that it? You were joking? > >> Aren't you the one who shot him to begin with? Oh wait, don't tell >> me, I've just run into Ted Nugent? Guitar "hero" still trying to >> make good on adolescnt wanking Ted? > > sorry, I am not able to follow you here. English is neither my native > tongue nor culture. I suspect there are several levels of irony in > your interjection, but I simply don't have the cultural reference to > follow you. And to be able to catch up to your level is far beyond my > possibilities, joking in a foreign language is extremely difficult. Nuff said: Unicode is <don't make ME say it, cuz you know I will>. That said, shut up. > >> That said, doesn't that Mittens Romeny underling look like a bat? And >> halloween is coming up!! > > same here You're a bat too? Whoa!!! I CAN solve that problem!!! "goverment jobs" are minimum wage. Anyone getting money to market their idiocy, are automatically enlisted in the marines, and WILL get front-line duty, and it behooves them to learn it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-09-02 11:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <50432978.4030100@loria.fr> |
| In reply to | #25741 |
Am 02.09.2012 10:44, schrieb Anse: > Jens Gustedt wrote: >> Am 02.09.2012 07:26, schrieb Anse: >>> I >> >> ah, so you got yourself a new alias, suspected that you would come up >> with something like this. Good to know that these tow are the same. > > You still grasp at me even after I said I am not "your leader"? ah, you said that? you said anything? not easy to grasp in all that sermon > It sucks for me when it is quiet. It only sucks more when it is not. What is that "it" that sucks you? Must be an interesting concept. I see from the dictionary that "to suck" may have a certain sexual connotation. But I don't see the relationship with C. There may be offers on the Internet that correspond better to your needs, no? So why don't you just try to find a place that suits better to you needs? Jens
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c
csiph-web