Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #106812
| From | Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: for-loop scopes |
| Date | 2017-03-23 16:31 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <slrn3vfsod7u80.65h.ike@iceland.freeshell.org> (permalink) |
| References | <ob0drl$agb$1@dont-email.me> |
On 2017-03-23, BartC <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:
> {
> double i; // scope 1
> for (int i=0; i<10; ++i) // scope 2
> i; // scope 2
> i; // scope 1, deliberate misalignment
>
> Is is correct that the 'int i' inside the for-loop header creates a new
> scope for the following single statement, even without the existence of
> a formal {...} block?
>
> I'm just asking because I'm finding it hard to believe that those last
> two final 'i' terms switch types with merely an intervening ';'.
It's not the case that 'i' switches types.
The two 'i'-s just denote different objects.
Their types could be the same and they would still denote different objects:
int i; /* scope 1 */
for (int i = 0; i != 10; ++i) i; /* scope 2 */
i; /* scope 1 */
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
for-loop scopes BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-03-23 12:11 +0000
Re: for-loop scopes David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-23 14:14 +0100
Re: for-loop scopes BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-03-23 13:45 +0000
Re: for-loop scopes David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-23 15:48 +0100
Re: for-loop scopes Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-23 23:01 -0500
Re: for-loop scopes BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-03-24 10:27 +0000
Re: for-loop scopes jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2017-03-24 10:43 -0700
Re: for-loop scopes Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-26 21:57 -0500
Re: for-loop scopes Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-23 08:37 -0700
Re: for-loop scopes Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2017-03-23 16:31 +0000
Re: for-loop scopes "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 10:23 -0700
Re: for-loop scopes BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-03-23 18:07 +0000
Re: for-loop scopes David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-23 20:05 +0100
Re: for-loop scopes jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2017-03-23 12:33 -0700
Re: for-loop scopes John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 11:35 -0700
Re: for-loop scopes Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 21:06 +0100
Re: for-loop scopes Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-28 19:15 -0700
Re: for-loop scopes Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-28 19:19 -0700
Re: for-loop scopes supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-03-29 13:14 -0700
csiph-web