Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #4153

Re: Rationale for

From Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Rationale for
Date 2011-05-17 06:09 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <slrn3vfsit4497.aoi.ike@iceland.freeshell.org> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <iqlv7u$oqn$1@dont-email.me> <iqr9ck$t76$1@usenet01.boi.hp.com> <lnr57yfz42.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <0.61635c98e980b76d7f74.20110516230009BST.87tycuux06.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <iqsqmq$63s$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2011-05-17, Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
> Speaking of which, does anyone have any clue as to the rationale behind 
> why, in:
>
>    int main(void) {
>        char c = 'C';
>        char * cp = &c;
>        const char * ccp = &c;
>        char ** cpp = &cp;
>        #ifdef NOPE
>        const char ** ccpp = &cp;
>        #endif
>        const char ** ccpp = &ccp;
>
>        return 0;
>      }
>
> we are not permitted to (in a standard sense) "suddenly" 'const'-qualify 
> the doubly-pointed-to type?  It would appear that 6.7.3p9 prevents us 
> from having compatible types there, and I could understand not wanting 
> to allow for the _removal_ of 'const' qualification, but couldn't it be 
> helpful to add it?
>
> Is it for symmetry?  Is it because the rules might be too complicated? :)

Have you read http://c-faq.com/ansi/constmismatch.html ?

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

I need help janus <emekamicro@gmail.com> - 2011-05-14 04:05 -0700
  Re: I need help "Heinrich Wolf" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-14 13:30 +0200
    Re: I need help "Joachim Schmitz" <jojo.nospam@schmitz-digital.de> - 2011-05-14 13:46 +0200
      Re: I need help "Heinrich Wolf" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-14 14:20 +0200
    Re: I need help Columbus sailed the ocean China Blue <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-14 04:48 -0700
  Re: I need help "Joachim Schmitz" <jojo.nospam@schmitz-digital.de> - 2011-05-14 13:39 +0200
    Re: I need help "Joachim Schmitz" <jojo.nospam@schmitz-digital.de> - 2011-05-14 13:44 +0200
    Re: I need help "Heinrich Wolf" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-14 14:23 +0200
      Re: I need help "Joachim Schmitz" <jojo.nospam@schmitz-digital.de> - 2011-05-16 16:47 +0200
    Re: I need help James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-05-14 09:14 -0400
      Re: I need help "Joachim Schmitz" <jojo.nospam@schmitz-digital.de> - 2011-05-16 16:43 +0200
        Re: I need help Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-16 08:23 -0700
          Re: I need help Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-05-16 23:00 +0100
            Rationale for Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 23:40 -0500
              Re: Rationale for Some of 6.7.3p9? Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 23:43 -0500
                Re: Rationale for Some of 6.7.3p9? Heikki Kallasjoki <see@end.of.message.invalid> - 2011-05-17 06:06 +0000
                Re: Rationale for Some of 6.7.3p9? Heikki Kallasjoki <see@end.of.message.invalid> - 2011-05-17 06:13 +0000
                Re: Rationale for Some of 6.7.3p9? Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-05-17 14:03 +0000
                Re: Rationale for Some of 6.7.3p9? Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 10:19 -0400
              Re: Rationale for Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2011-05-17 06:09 +0000
                Re: Rationale for Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 10:20 -0400
  Re: I need help Columbus sailed the ocean China Blue <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-14 04:45 -0700
  Re: I need help Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-05-14 09:39 -0400
    Re: I need help sandeep <nospam@nospam.com> - 2011-05-15 21:37 +0000
      Re: I need help Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-05-15 18:35 -0400
        Re: I need help pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-05-15 19:45 -0400
          Re: I need help pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-05-15 20:15 -0400
        Re: I need help sandeep <nospam@nospam.com> - 2011-05-16 18:27 +0000
          Re: I need help Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 14:45 -0400
          Re: I need help Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-16 11:41 -0700
            Re: I need help Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-05-16 19:12 +0000
              Re: I need help Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-16 12:30 -0700
                Re: I need help Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-05-16 20:09 +0000
                Re: I need help sandeep <nospam@nospam.com> - 2011-05-16 20:35 +0000
                Re: I need help Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-05-16 23:22 +0100
                Re: I need help David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2011-05-24 01:19 -0400
              Re: I need help Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-05-19 00:19 -0700
                Re: I need help Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-05-19 14:37 +0000
                Re: I need help Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-19 08:17 -0700
                Re: I need help Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-05-19 16:08 +0000
                Re: I need help Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-05-19 11:13 -0700
      Re: I need help Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-16 08:12 -0700

csiph-web