Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #75288

Re: should c be a subset of c++?

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: should c be a subset of c++?
Date Sat, 07 Nov 2015 11:54:18 -0800
Organization None to speak of
Lines 28
Message-ID <lnmvup1t79.fsf@kst-u.example.com> (permalink)
References <32c7b61e-1216-4b5d-8a4d-4c56af7cecf3@googlegroups.com> <cb9cd5c6-3f72-4b8e-ba61-d91b6a9683c9@googlegroups.com> <87mvx1lpah.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <659d80d7-7620-45bc-982f-72f680c9e52e@googlegroups.com> <87io7pjccj.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87929a18-a286-41ab-9256-269bf82d93b7@googlegroups.com> <55eb3cb4.20780203@news.xs4all.nl> <871teciq1o.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <57e3fd44-5ddc-4120-a516-9378ed727862@googlegroups.com> <87egibhe03.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <d3675375-2cf3-49b4-9c65-e81fa63101d3@googlegroups.com> <mshl7g$v7p$1@dont-email.me> <d53fviF9nfaU1@mid.individual.net> <0c365ef8-ec2d-4617-b0f5-0a13acc4feba@googlegroups.com> <29c78bf7-83d1-4497-b9c5-bee6b774f5ad@googlegroups.com> <MPG.30a70a76a54eae5a989c28@news.eternal-september.org> <fd444f7c-2b44-4d6c-9044-d9b0df0a66fa@googlegroups.com> <gno%x.29506$eE.13779@fx07.iad> <6f55f057-7afa-470b-b399-ff9a3b4da2ed@googlegroups.com> <n1le0a$d9q$1@dont-email.me> <1d3d042b-e8f8-47c1-b067-c2001ffd4ddf@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="945944de09706c9b4e29b53c9d2efdc2"; logging-data="6392"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/wPCRloO/HIidarNzdCPLk"
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:hyfDNx0Ai53ybhxDuR/TCwswbvg= sha1:qsNlk3rYYOHxnby11XRBTNkWHyw=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.c:75288

Show key headers only | View raw


Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> writes:
> On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 5:58:54 PM UTC, Martin Shobe wrote:
>> On 11/7/2015 11:12 AM, Malcolm McLean wrote:
>> > Temperature? Can we say that absolute zero is in fact the "highest"
>> > possible temperature, and all temperatures are "really" negative?
>> 
>> Yes.
>> 
> So there we've got an example of what you consider to be a real negative
> quantity. Temperature is "really" on a scale with absolute zero
> being the maximum, and everything else -X below it.

I don't think Martin was saying that that's the "real" way to
consider temperatures, merely that we *can* look at them that way.

For example, the Celsius scale originally water freezing at 100
degrees and boiling at 0; it was reversed after Celsius's death.
The modern version makes better physical sense, since higher
temperatures correspond to higher energy -- but either would be
workable.

[...]

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: should c be a subset of c++? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 19:06 -0500
  Re: should c be a subset of c++? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-07 00:41 -0800
    Re: should c be a subset of c++? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-11-07 10:01 -0500
      Re: should c be a subset of c++? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-07 09:12 -0800
        Re: should c be a subset of c++? Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-07 11:58 -0600
          Re: should c be a subset of c++? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-07 10:25 -0800
            Re: should c be a subset of c++? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-07 11:54 -0800
              Re: should c be a subset of c++? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-07 14:22 -0800
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-08 13:05 -0600
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-08 11:39 -0800
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2015-11-13 13:20 -0800
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-11-13 16:36 -0500
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-11-14 00:03 +0000
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2015-11-13 17:06 -0800
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2015-11-13 13:29 -0800
            Re: should c be a subset of c++? Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-08 12:57 -0600
              Re: should c be a subset of c++? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-08 11:37 -0800
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-08 17:16 -0800
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-11-08 18:19 -0800
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-08 23:25 -0600
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 22:34 +0000
        Re: should c be a subset of c++? raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-11-13 22:18 +0000
          Re: should c be a subset of c++? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-11-14 00:11 +0000
            Re: should c be a subset of c++? raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-11-17 22:16 +0000
              Re: should c be a subset of c++? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-17 21:09 -0800
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-18 05:22 +0000
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-18 06:03 -0800
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-18 08:44 -0800
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-18 09:11 -0800
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-18 09:54 -0800
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-11-24 01:49 -0800
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-24 02:58 -0800
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-11-24 11:58 +0000
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-24 09:09 -0800
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-25 00:12 -0800
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-11-25 12:35 +0000
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-11-27 16:30 +0000
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-11-19 10:37 +0000
                Re: should c be a subset of c++? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-11-20 15:40 -0800
  Re: should c be a subset of c++? Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 22:20 +0000

csiph-web