Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #66462

Re: C89 compatibility question

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: C89 compatibility question
Date Mon, 27 Jul 2015 16:22:24 -0700
Organization None to speak of
Lines 17
Message-ID <lnk2tlnq33.fsf@kst-u.example.com> (permalink)
References <mp5agt$sos$1@dont-email.me> <lnoaixo2mt.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <mp6a53$avc$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="945944de09706c9b4e29b53c9d2efdc2"; logging-data="23251"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19fY+P0aVO5Wig5LApveOcW"
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:KcQ5gyl4gsKGvGDjiOOkszdcVtI= sha1:Fd3PEzionyWYlihCM0Leve61sfA=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.c:66462

Show key headers only | View raw

"Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> writes:
>     In my own gcc I have noticed I do not have the ISO header, float.h, or 
> stdbool.h. There may be more lacking so my compiler is not fully ansi or iso 
> compliant.

How do you know they're missing?  The only way you can be sure they're
missing is by compiling a program that uses them.  Don't assume that the
files live in any specific location.

In particular, if "/usr/include/stdbool.h" doesn't exist, that doesn't
mean there's a problem.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

C89 compatibility question "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-27 09:10 -0400
  Re: C89 compatibility question Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2015-07-27 17:50 +0200
    Re: C89 compatibility question "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-27 12:25 -0400
    Re: C89 compatibility question "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-27 14:36 -0400
  Re: C89 compatibility question Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2015-07-27 19:54 +0200
    Re: C89 compatibility question "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-27 14:23 -0400
      Re: C89 compatibility question Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-07-27 17:24 -0700
        Re: C89 compatibility question "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-28 13:57 -0400
    Re: C89 compatibility question "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-27 14:27 -0400
  Re: C89 compatibility question Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-27 11:51 -0700
    Re: C89 compatibility question "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-27 14:53 -0400
    Re: C89 compatibility question "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-27 18:10 -0400
      Re: C89 compatibility question Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-27 16:22 -0700
        Re: C89 compatibility question "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-07-28 09:28 -0400
          Re: C89 compatibility question Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-28 10:36 -0700

csiph-web