Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: efficient coding with literals and variables |
| Date | 2016-06-15 10:01 -0700 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Message-ID | <lnk2hqz8qh.fsf@kst-u.example.com> (permalink) |
| References | <literals-20160614201332@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <njpnbq$je8$1@dont-email.me> <njqucm$1e9$1@dont-email.me> |
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
> On 14/06/16 21:53, BartC wrote:
[...]
>> (I'm not sure I would bother either: if these are constant values known
>> at compile time, then #define or enums are better ways of denoting a
>> named constant.)
>
> No, #define and enum are /not/ better ways of denoting named constants.
> They are sometimes the only way to get what you need, especially in C
> (in C++, "const int" is more powerful than it is in plain C). It's okay
> to say that you /prefer/ to use #define or enum for named constants -
> but don't make the mistake of thinking your preferences for an extremely
> simple, limited and flat-structured language is "better" for other
> people or other purposes.
The problem with const is that it doesn't create a constant expression.
enum does (though it's limited to constants of type int).
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: efficient coding with literals and variables BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-06-14 20:53 +0100
Re: efficient coding with literals and variables David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-06-15 08:59 +0200
Re: efficient coding with literals and variables Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-06-15 10:01 -0700
Re: efficient coding with literals and variables David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-06-15 19:47 +0200
Re: efficient coding with literals and variables Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-06-15 11:47 -0700
Re: efficient coding with literals and variables Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2016-06-15 21:23 +0000
Re: efficient coding with literals and variables David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-06-15 23:53 +0200
Re: efficient coding with literals and variables Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2016-06-15 22:41 +0000
Re: efficient coding with literals and variables "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-06-15 18:54 -0400
Re: efficient coding with literals and variables Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2016-06-16 05:41 +0000
Re: efficient coding with literals and variables David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-06-16 09:12 +0200
Re: efficient coding with literals and variables Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-06-15 14:53 -0700
csiph-web