Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #101056

Re: Using == operator

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Using == operator
Date Tue, 03 Jan 2017 15:30:43 -0800
Organization None to speak of
Lines 29
Message-ID <lnfukzu3fg.fsf@kst-u.example.com> (permalink)
References <4598b1a6-e647-4327-85d8-23f83198d0c6@googlegroups.com> <o4djuk$ebt$1@dont-email.me> <o4dkf4$g93$1@dont-email.me> <o4dvdt$nnb$1@dont-email.me> <true-20170102181321@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <o4e4i6$bna$1@dont-email.me> <o4eksj$770$1@dont-email.me> <f51d05e0-e83f-4eb8-922a-59b0f241ee2c@googlegroups.com> <lnr34luib2.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <o4h53l$umh$1@dont-email.me> <lnshozu7b7.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <640f8d29-0683-4614-9cde-c22e80e4dd00@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="167f7d05f22907ea8e3985ed50c4ed73"; logging-data="9414"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX186iQUhMWVyaB25h0Whg77T"
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:GC2J+yEVKBhJnKSfHUXYFeoCmzM= sha1:Zvj/RpwgeOu/AgyX2/n0arLwFPo=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.c:101056

Show key headers only | View raw

supercat@casperkitty.com writes:
> On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 4:06:27 PM UTC-6, Keith Thompson wrote:
>> Even if we assume that that corresponds to `if (apple_count)`, what's
>> the corresponding English for if(node->next)?
>
> Since every pointer which is used in such a context is required to either
> be a valid pointer or a null pointer, the English would be "If the object
> pointed to by 'node' has a valid 'next' pointer, then...."  Although the
> code is in a literal sense comparing a pointer with a null pointer, such
> a comparison is merely the means by which code determines that a pointer is
> valid.

A null pointer is valid in some contexts (including this one), there are
invalid pointers other than the null pointer, and claiming that

    if(node->next)

can be read as

    If the object pointed to by 'node' has a valid 'next' pointer,
    then....

hardly supports the claim that it "reads like English".

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

guidelines for pointer check Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 12:53 -0800
  Re: guidelines for pointer check Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-30 09:58 +1300
  Re: guidelines for pointer check Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-12-29 13:39 -0800
    Re: guidelines for pointer check Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 15:24 -0800
      Re: guidelines for pointer check Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2016-12-29 19:05 -0500
        Re: guidelines for pointer check Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 05:27 -0800
          Re: guidelines for pointer check Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-12-30 14:35 +0000
          Re: guidelines for pointer check supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-12-30 10:38 -0800
        Re: guidelines for pointer check Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-01-02 02:28 -0800
      Re: guidelines for pointer check Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-12-29 16:19 -0800
  Re: guidelines for pointer check Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-12-29 13:58 -0800
  guidelines for pointer check asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2016-12-30 05:35 -0800
  Re: guidelines for pointer check raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2017-01-01 10:47 +0000
  Re: guidelines for pointer check Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-01-02 14:19 +0100
    Re: guidelines for pointer check David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-02 14:28 +0100
      Re: guidelines for pointer check Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-01-02 17:35 +0100
        Re: Using == operator Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-01-02 19:03 +0100
          Re: Using == operator David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-02 23:41 +0100
            Re: Using == operator Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-01-02 14:54 -0800
              Re: Using == operator Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-01-02 15:57 -0800
                Re: Using == operator Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2017-01-03 16:31 -0500
                Re: Using == operator Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-01-03 14:06 -0800
                Re: Using == operator Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-01-03 14:44 -0800
                Re: Using == operator Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-01-03 15:05 -0800
                Re: Using == operator Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2017-01-04 16:42 +0000
                Re: Using == operator Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-01-15 11:46 -0800
                Re: Using == operator Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2017-01-03 21:22 -0700
                Re: Using == operator supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-01-03 15:23 -0800
                Re: Using == operator Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-01-03 15:30 -0800
                Re: Using == operator supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-01-03 16:02 -0800
                Re: Using == operator Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-01-03 16:30 -0800
                Re: Using == operator Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-01-15 11:26 -0800
                Re: Using == operator raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2017-01-04 09:55 +0000
                Re: Using == operator Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2017-01-04 16:49 +0000
                Re: Using == operator raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2017-01-10 01:28 +0000
                Re: Using == operator Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2017-01-09 19:12 -0700
                Re: Using == operator Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-01-15 09:12 -0800
                Re: Using == operator Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-01-15 09:54 -0800
              Re: Using == operator raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2017-01-03 21:08 +0000
                Re: Using == operator Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-01-15 06:44 -0800
  Re: guidelines for pointer check Anand Hariharan <mailto.anand.hariharan@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 08:54 -0800
    Re: guidelines for pointer check Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-01-14 00:51 -0800

csiph-web