Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: what is data type 'int *' ? |
| Date | 2015-02-05 19:09 -0800 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Message-ID | <ln8ugbloql.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> (permalink) |
| References | <mauauc$p5v$1@dont-email.me> <q4zAw.1325618$412.538957@fx30.iad> <lna90smjjt.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <mb12ld$uh7$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> writes:
> Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote:
> (snip on the return type and value of main)
>
>> The change you're thinking of was made by C99.
>
>> Prior to C99, falling off the end of main returned an "undefined" result
>> to the environment. This wasn't forbidden, and might not cause any real
>> problems as long as you didn't do anything that depends on the program's
>> exit status.
>
> Seems like I remember some figuring out that the return value was
> the value of the last expression, which would be left in the
> appropriate register.
That may well be true for some implementations. It's not tre in
general.
>> In C99 and later, reaching the closing } is equivalent to `return 0;`.
>> (I'm not convinced that adding this special case was a good idea.)
>
> If something is done often enough, it seems that special case is
> convenient and not confusing.
There's a case to be made for that; I don't feel very strongly about it
one way or the other.
> Though I could wonder why not have all functions that fall off the
> end return zero?
Not all functions return a type for which "zero" is meaningful.
> Early (version -1) of Mathematica required [] on Quit, like all
> other function references. After I complained about this, it was
> made a special case. I think it was worth changing, though less
> consistent.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
what is data type 'int *' ? bilsch <king621@comcast.net> - 2015-02-04 23:45 +0000
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-02-05 00:09 +0000
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-02-05 01:24 +0000
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-02-05 07:00 -0500
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-02-05 14:09 +0000
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-02-05 13:08 -0600
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-02-06 00:33 +0000
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-02-05 19:30 -0600
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-02-06 10:17 +0000
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-02-07 13:21 -0800
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2015-02-04 19:47 -0500
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? bilsch <king621@comcast.net> - 2015-02-05 09:40 +0000
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-02-05 09:51 +0000
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-02-05 08:04 -0800
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-02-06 00:42 +0000
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-02-05 19:09 -0800
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-02-05 01:17 +0000
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-02-05 03:04 +0000
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-02-05 03:06 +0000
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-02-05 03:06 +0000
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-02-05 10:20 +0000
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-02-05 10:47 +0000
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-02-05 12:18 +0000
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-02-05 12:40 +0000
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-02-05 08:24 -0800
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-02-05 11:42 -0500
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-02-05 17:13 +0000
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-02-05 08:43 -0800
Re: what is data type 'int *' ? bilsch <king621@comcast.net> - 2015-02-05 09:45 +0000
THANKS FOR THE INFO bilsch <king621@comcast.net> - 2015-02-05 09:47 +0000
csiph-web