Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #7673

Re: what is the output?

From Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: what is the output?
Date 2011-07-05 11:18 -0700
Organization None to speak of
Message-ID <ln62ng382k.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <fd8edf90-9baa-4b0a-a8ef-30b05fe0004c@g12g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <87vcvio6pr.fsf@temporary-address.org.uk> <ln39il4tpu.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <iuthgq$a1q$1@dont-email.me> <76f4c909-9d5a-42cf-8584-7a341a70d82d@35g2000prp.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> writes:
> On Jul 4, 4:14 pm, James Kuyper <jameskuy...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> On 07/04/2011 05:33 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
>> > Dr Nick <3-nos...@temporary-address.org.uk> writes:
>> ...
>> >> My guess is he didn't.  My guess is it's our resident troll again.
>> >> Let's count shall we:
>>
>> >> no #includes
>> >> no type for main
>> >> no void
>> >> no trailing newline on printf
>> >> no return from main
>>
>> >> 5 out of 5.
>>
>> >> That's ignoring the actual problem of course.
>>
>> > My guess is that it's simply old code.  IIRC, 4 out of 5 of the
>> > things you count are characteristics of the "hello world" program
>> > in K&R1.
>>
>> How about:
>> no follow-up response.
>>
>> That's generally a pretty good indicator of our resident troll.
>
> So like, I got rejected by UCLA three times in a row and UC Berkeley
> like 4 times in a row. Actually, now that I think about it, the people
> in the Computer Science Department at UCLA didn't even want to talk to
> me this last time around.

I can't wait to see how this turns out to be relevant.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Nokia
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

what is the output? vinay kumar <vinay5b9@gmail.com> - 2011-07-03 09:34 -0700
  Re: what is the output? "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2011-07-03 11:57 -0500
  Re: what is the output? Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2011-07-03 19:05 +0200
    Re: what is the output? Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2011-07-03 19:18 +0200
      Re: what is the output? Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2011-07-03 19:22 +0200
  Re: what is the output? Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-07-03 12:31 -0700
  Re: what is the output? Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-07-03 14:08 -0600
    Re: what is the output? Hans Vlems <hvlems@freenet.de> - 2011-07-03 23:33 -0700
      Re: what is the output? Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2011-07-04 08:17 +0100
        Re: what is the output? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-04 14:33 -0700
          Re: what is the output? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-07-04 19:14 -0400
            Re: what is the output? Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2011-07-05 10:59 -0700
              Re: what is the output? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-05 11:18 -0700
              Re: what is the output? Todd Carnes <toddcarnes@gmail.com> - 2011-07-05 18:23 +0000
            Re: what is the output? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-07-05 23:00 -0400
      Re: what is the output? Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-07-04 07:25 -0600
      Re: what is the output? Willem <willem@turtle.stack.nl> - 2011-07-04 15:11 +0000
        Re: what is the output? Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-07-07 17:33 +0300

csiph-web