Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Variables allocated on stack |
| Date | 2011-11-27 12:48 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <9jdc6uF4d0U14@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <jaqh9b$ght$1@dont-email.me> <l2u7q8-m8a.ln1@voyager.wichi.de.vu> <jarr5c$vv0$1@dont-email.me> <9jda3mF4d0U13@mid.individual.net> <jart4g$d7p$1@dont-email.me> |
On 11/27/11 12:35 PM, BartC wrote: > "Ian Collins"<ian-news@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:9jda3mF4d0U13@mid.individual.net... >> On 11/27/11 12:00 PM, BartC wrote: >>> "Markus Wichmann"<nullplan@gmx.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Plus, when you ask a compiler writer whether he want's to include >>>> _two_different_ calling conventions in his compiler with the added >>>> maintenance and stuff, guess what he'll say. >>> >>> Isn't that what happens anyway, when calling a function in a different >>> language? (pascal, stdcall and so on.) >> >> No. At least not on any of the platforms I'm familiar with. > > So how do you call Pascal, Fortran, (or C++) etc from C on your platform? Do > you not need to tell it that that imported function is in a different > language? Fortran and C++ have standard mechanisms for C interoperability. I don't know about Pascal, I haven't used it since the 80s... >> Other languages know how to call C (so they can access the platform's >> services). > > The platform interface should be language-independent. This is where a > binary interface becomes useful. (C has done a good job here in past, in > defining such interfaces, but there is often confusion; is 'long' 32-bits or > 64-bits for example? gcc for Windows says 32, gcc for Linux says 64.) The sizes of types is defined by the platform's ABI. When in Rome and all that.. > But should a complex, register-based interface (I believe this might be for > x86-64) be also used as the standard when one C function calls another C > function in the same application? Why not? The AMD64 calling convention offers significant performance advantages. -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Variables allocated on stack Bogdan <cristeab@gmail.com> - 2011-11-24 13:28 -0800
Re: Variables allocated on stack Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-25 10:40 +1300
Re: Variables allocated on stack jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-24 23:30 +0100
Re: Variables allocated on stack Quentin Pope <qp19433@hotmail.NOSPAM.com> - 2011-12-02 22:33 +0000
Re: Variables allocated on stack jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-12-03 00:54 +0100
Re: Variables allocated on stack Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-12-02 23:33 -0800
Re: Variables allocated on stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-12-03 02:25 -0800
Re: Variables allocated on stack jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2011-11-24 23:37 +0000
Re: Variables allocated on stack Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-25 01:53 -0800
Re: Variables allocated on stack "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-25 11:05 +0000
Re: Variables allocated on stack jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-25 12:11 +0100
Re: Variables allocated on stack "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-25 11:40 +0000
Re: Variables allocated on stack jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-25 12:52 +0100
Re: Variables allocated on stack Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-27 02:31 -0800
Re: Variables allocated on stack jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-27 13:28 +0100
Re: Variables allocated on stack André Gillibert <MetaEntropy.removeThis@gmail.com> - 2011-11-27 13:44 +0100
Re: Variables allocated on stack jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-27 15:44 +0100
Re: Variables allocated on stack André Gillibert <MetaEntropy.removeThis@gmail.com> - 2011-11-27 17:34 +0100
Re: Variables allocated on stack jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-27 18:28 +0100
Re: Variables allocated on stack Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-28 07:48 +1300
Re: Variables allocated on stack gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-11-29 01:11 -0800
Re: Variables allocated on stack jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-29 17:02 +0100
Re: Variables allocated on stack Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-11-26 07:21 +0000
Re: Variables allocated on stack "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-26 11:07 +0000
Re: Variables allocated on stack Markus Wichmann <nullplan@gmx.net> - 2011-11-26 21:16 +0100
Re: Variables allocated on stack "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-26 23:00 +0000
Re: Variables allocated on stack Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-27 12:12 +1300
Re: Variables allocated on stack "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-26 23:35 +0000
Re: Variables allocated on stack Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-27 12:48 +1300
Re: Variables allocated on stack Markus Wichmann <nullplan@gmx.net> - 2011-11-27 10:56 +0100
Re: Variables allocated on stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-28 16:17 -0800
Re: Variables allocated on stack Markus Wichmann <nullplan@gmx.net> - 2011-11-30 17:04 +0100
Re: Variables allocated on stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-30 09:36 -0800
Re: Variables allocated on stack Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-01-25 05:11 -0800
Re: Variables allocated on stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-25 12:23 -0800
Re: Variables allocated on stack Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-01-31 19:11 -0800
Re: Variables allocated on stack Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-27 13:06 +1300
Re: Variables allocated on stack André Gillibert <MetaEntropy.removeThis@gmail.com> - 2011-11-27 11:20 +0100
Re: Variables allocated on stack David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2012-01-19 02:43 -0500
Re: Variables allocated on stack Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-11-28 08:32 +0000
Re: Variables allocated on stack Bogdan <cristeab@gmail.com> - 2011-11-26 01:18 -0800
Re: Variables allocated on stack Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-26 08:36 -0500
Re: Variables allocated on stack Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-11-26 07:21 +0000
Re: Variables allocated on stack Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2011-11-29 11:51 +0100
csiph-web