Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Character Array vs String |
| Date | 2011-11-10 08:56 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <9i270bFfdvU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <slrnjbkqmr.pt.qcarbonn@localhost.localdomain> <3278969.27.1320842921986.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prep8> <670026a6-8f9d-4112-bf32-444a3a5fd3f7@m7g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <9hvlfpFe46U1@mid.individual.net> <c5ddf1f2-6a08-461f-9c5c-9b85774bcdd2@e3g2000vbs.googlegroups.com> |
Nick Keighley wrote: > On Nov 9, 3:44 pm, "osmium" <r124c4u...@comcast.net> wrote: >> "Nick Keighley" wrote: >> On Nov 9, 12:48 pm, 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88...@googlemail.com> > >>> For unicode support in C is documented in C99. In C89 the 8-bit >>> ANSI char > > your attributions are screwed I didn't write that Sorry about that. I didn't notice you were using google to respond. My email program considers google newsgroup responses as "broken" and I use a special program (this one) to respond to those messages. But I just didn't notice that you were using google. >>> the character code you are trying to refer to is "ASCII" not "ANSI" >> >> Furthermore, ASCII is a 7-bit code, not 8. > > I thought there was a parity bit? We all have misinformation in our head. >> It is usually extended in some >> fashion to become eight bits in actual use as opposed to an >> abstraction. > > ASCII wasn't "an abstraction", it was a widely used code. Those codes > using the top bit for data encoding aren't ASCII I used "abstraction" in the sense that I don't know of any place where pure, honest-to-god-ASCII is used. The interchange hardware I know of, optical disks, tapes, external hard drives, are all based on 8-bit bytes. I guess I would grudgingly accept a code where the top bit was guaranteed to be zero or used for parity. If you can provide a sample or three I would be very interested. Perhaps there is an obscure code point in MS-DOS that you know of? Clinton mode on. I now note you say "was" rather than "is". Where _was_ real ASCII used? Was there perhaps a magnetic tape format for 7-bit code that two or more organizations agreed to use?
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Character Array vs String Sheky <shekhar07.nitdgp@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 03:09 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-09 03:28 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-09 06:52 -0500
Re: Character Array vs String Quentin Carbonneaux <qcarbonn@invalid.com> - 2011-11-09 12:01 +0000
Re: Character Array vs String 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-09 04:48 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-09 05:53 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2011-11-09 09:44 -0600
Re: Character Array vs String Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-10 00:57 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2011-11-10 08:56 -0600
Re: Character Array vs String Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-10 08:16 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String "Joachim Schmitz" <nospam.jojo@schmitz-digital.de> - 2011-11-10 18:34 +0100
Re: Character Array vs String Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2011-11-10 14:08 -0500
Re: Character Array vs String Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-10 20:52 +0000
Re: Character Array vs String Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-11 01:29 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String Lowell Gilbert <lgusenet@be-well.ilk.org> - 2011-11-10 12:29 -0500
Re: Character Array vs String lawrence.jones@siemens.com - 2011-11-10 12:32 -0500
Re: Character Array vs String Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-10 12:41 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2011-11-11 13:12 +0000
Re: Character Array vs String David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2011-11-21 02:39 -0500
Re: Character Array vs String Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2011-11-23 11:39 -0500
Re: Character Array vs String "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-23 17:15 +0000
Re: Character Array vs String Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-11-23 18:48 +0000
Re: Character Array vs String Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-11-23 10:58 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String Patrick Scheible <kkt@zipcon.net> - 2011-11-27 20:21 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2012-01-19 02:43 -0500
Re: Character Array vs String Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-09 07:48 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-09 11:06 -0500
Re: Character Array vs String Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-11-09 16:24 +0000
Re: Character Array vs String James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-09 11:30 -0500
Re: Character Array vs String "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-09 16:53 +0000
Re: Character Array vs String Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-11-09 17:05 +0000
Re: Character Array vs String Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-09 08:54 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String Tobias Blass <tobiasblass@gmx.net> - 2011-11-09 21:01 +0000
Re: Character Array vs String "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-09 21:26 +0000
Re: Character Array vs String Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-10 01:11 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2011-11-21 02:39 -0500
Re: Character Array vs String Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-21 00:15 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-09 14:06 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2011-11-09 19:32 -0600
Re: Character Array vs String Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-10 03:21 +0000
Re: Character Array vs String "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-10 11:00 +0000
Re: Character Array vs String Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-10 03:26 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-10 12:04 +0000
Re: Character Array vs String Lew Pitcher <lpitcher@teksavvy.com> - 2011-11-21 12:02 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2011-11-23 11:42 -0500
Re: Character Array vs String Uno <merrilljensen@q.com> - 2011-11-27 22:46 -0700
Re: Character Array vs String Lew Pitcher <lpitcher@teksavvy.com> - 2011-11-27 23:30 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-28 00:22 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-09 13:59 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-09 08:36 -0500
Re: Character Array vs String Quentin Carbonneaux <qcarbonn@invalid.com> - 2011-11-09 14:06 +0000
Re: Character Array vs String Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-09 05:38 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-09 13:52 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-09 07:39 -0500
Re: Character Array vs String "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-09 13:51 +0000
Re: Character Array vs String John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2011-11-23 19:32 -0800
Re: Character Array vs String James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-24 11:49 -0500
csiph-web