Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: macro conventions |
| Date | 2011-05-16 07:40 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <93aoh7FlpiU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <4dcd62ab$0$23874$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net> <gjpqs69uh0h50ssjml2upma865bo90epav@4ax.com> <lnboz4gji9.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <890d6d8f-2f87-44b3-8a8a-07779f67a486@w36g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> |
On 05/16/11 03:29 AM, Malcolm McLean wrote: > On May 15, 4:50 pm, Keith Thompson<ks...@mib.org> wrote: >> ralph<nt_consultin...@yahoo.net> writes: >> >> TO be clear, it's leading underscores that should be avoided. FOO_BAR, >> for example, is perfectly ok. Trailing underscores are also ok, though >> I wouldn't use them without a good reason. >> > One problem with underscores is that they are not pronounced. So it > can be hard to remember whether it's FOO_BAR or FOOBAR. They are pounced as a space or pause, FOO_BAR is pronounced as FOO BAR, not FOOBAR. > Also, > experience with websites has shown that people prefer words > runtogetherratherthan separated_out_by_underscores, if spaces aren't > an option. Citation? I could understand runTogetherRatherThan. -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
macro conventions "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-13 12:56 -0400
Re: macro conventions pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-05-13 13:08 -0400
Re: macro conventions Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-13 13:14 -0400
Re: macro conventions Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-13 11:41 -0700
Re: macro conventions "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-14 23:08 -0400
Re: macro conventions ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-05-13 13:15 -0500
Re: macro conventions "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-14 23:11 -0400
Re: macro conventions "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-15 04:00 -0400
Re: macro conventions Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-05-15 11:15 +0000
Re: macro conventions Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-05-16 04:36 +0300
Re: macro conventions Ike Naar <ike@sverige.freeshell.org> - 2011-05-16 09:56 +0000
Re: macro conventions Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-05-16 19:00 +0300
Re: macro conventions Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-05-16 19:10 +0000
Re: macro conventions Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-05-22 21:27 +0300
Re: macro conventions Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-15 06:50 -0700
Re: macro conventions Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-05-15 08:29 -0700
Re: macro conventions Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-16 07:40 +1200
Re: macro conventions "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2011-05-15 14:52 -0500
Re: macro conventions ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-05-16 02:22 -0500
Re: macro conventions Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-05-16 14:18 +0100
Re: macro conventions David Resnick <lndresnick@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 08:03 -0700
Re: macro conventions Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-05-16 17:32 +0100
Re: macro conventions Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-16 08:43 -0700
Re: macro conventions Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2011-05-16 14:47 -0700
csiph-web