Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #3192

Re: malloc

From "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: malloc
Date 2011-05-03 14:35 -0500
Message-ID <92b3o5F9uhU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <4dbce936$0$8355$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net> <925almFnc4U1@mid.individual.net> <4dbf5ca0$0$15086$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net> <92ag7mFadlU1@mid.individual.net> <4dc055a8$0$5073$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net>

Show all headers | View raw


"Bill Cunningham" wrote:

> osmium wrote:
>
>> Your post made clear that you were trying to skip the fundamentals
>> and go right to the meat of the thing; for this week your target was
>> "malloc".  My suggestion was for a more ordered approach in which you
>> might actually learn something and get a program you had written to
>> work.  But clearly you don't like that approach.
> [...]
>
>    How much more to "the meat of the thing" is malloc? I'm not sure that 
> I'm understanding you. What do you mean by a "more ordered approach" ? The 
> program that was written did not included malloc. And I noticed later it 
> was full of bugs as posted. I must admit I need to start testing code and 
> examining it more closely before posting. fread as was in the program is 
> designed to take a set number of data.
>    Hence my point. I am in no position to write code that expands and 
> ontracts memory storage on the fly. That was what my inquiry was 
> concerning. Using the FILE* and streams as an example.

Memory that expands or contracts is more complicated than a fixed target of 
known maximum size.Your post tells me you can't even handle that.  Thus the 
simpler assignment I suggested.  Your knowledge of argc, for example is 
woefully wrong..  If you understand the basics you should be able to do what 
I wrote in five minutes or less. 

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

malloc "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-01 01:01 -0400
  Re: malloc "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-01 01:03 -0400
  Re: malloc luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-30 22:31 -0700
    Re: malloc "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-01 02:15 -0400
    Re: malloc "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-05-01 13:52 +0100
      Re: malloc luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-02 00:05 -0700
        Re: malloc crisgoogle <crisd@telus.net> - 2011-05-02 17:43 -0700
  Re: malloc Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-01 17:35 +1200
  Re: malloc "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-01 02:14 -0400
    Re: malloc Mickey Mouse <fake@email.com> - 2011-05-01 00:18 -0700
      Re: malloc "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-01 04:07 -0400
        Re: malloc Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2011-05-01 10:31 -0700
          Re: malloc "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-02 16:55 -0400
          Re: malloc "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-02 23:51 -0400
      Re: malloc "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-02 16:58 -0400
        Re: malloc Mickey Mouse <fake@email.com> - 2011-05-02 14:34 -0700
          Re: malloc Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-03 09:55 +1200
            Re: malloc "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-03 10:20 -0400
              Re: malloc Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-05-03 14:55 +0000
                Re: malloc "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-03 15:34 -0400
                Re: malloc Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-05-03 20:56 +0000
            Re: malloc "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-03 11:29 -0400
          Re: malloc Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-05-02 22:18 +0000
          Re: malloc "Default User" <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-04 12:20 -0500
            Re: malloc Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-04 10:52 -0700
              Re: malloc Joe Wright <joewwright@comcast.net> - 2011-05-04 14:57 -0400
              Re: malloc "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-04 18:53 -0400
                Re: malloc Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-05-05 08:12 +0000
    Re: malloc John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2011-05-02 15:31 +0000
  Re: malloc "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2011-05-01 09:56 -0500
    Re: malloc "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-01 18:20 -0400
    Re: malloc "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-02 21:38 -0400
      Re: malloc "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2011-05-03 09:02 -0500
        Re: malloc "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-03 15:21 -0400
          Re: malloc "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2011-05-03 14:35 -0500
            Re: malloc "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-03 18:43 -0400
  Re: malloc Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-05-01 12:51 -0700
    Re: malloc "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-02 23:49 -0400
      Re: malloc Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-03 13:35 +1200
        Re: malloc "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-05-03 11:27 -0400
          Re: malloc Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-04 07:54 +1200
          Re: malloc Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-05-03 21:50 +0100

csiph-web