Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Winding and unwinding |
| Date | 2016-12-13 15:10 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87r35bamqs.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | (10 earlier) <6fcd40c1-ffb9-4495-8afc-182266faf35e@googlegroups.com> <e7bc7cbb-734a-42c8-9e50-b3b7c7b576f2@googlegroups.com> <4dda5ddd-2c99-4def-967d-203bfa2fb18d@googlegroups.com> <339b4939-173e-4a0e-bb48-c105e3cc2f8c@googlegroups.com> <o2oso5$scj$1@dont-email.me> |
BartC <bc@freeuk.com> writes: > On 13/12/2016 12:57, fir wrote: > >> few things can be take as topics for some discussion >> like you wnted to allow 1,000,000 for 1000000 - >> this i must agree - many would agree and noted i think >> that to use numbers such or at least "1 000 000 " way >> is something c lacks - but how to incorporate it in the >> syntax is some trouble/open question > > Yes, writing: > > f(1,000,000); > > is a little ambiguous. Is that one parameter (1000000) or three > (1,0,0)? In the unlikely event of ',' being added as a digit separator in C, this should be one argument. There is a natural interpretation based on the "maximum munch" used by the lexer -- take the longest sequence of character that makes a valid token. <snip> -- Ben.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Winding and unwinding "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 11:46 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 23:15 +0300
Re: Winding and unwinding Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 23:21 +0300
Re: Winding and unwinding "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 13:29 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 14:07 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 08:54 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 09:04 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 09:15 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-12-12 12:21 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-12-12 20:48 +0000
Re: Winding and unwinding "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 13:28 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 13:14 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 14:26 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 16:13 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 16:33 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 16:48 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 17:05 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 17:22 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 17:33 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 17:55 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 03:11 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 03:39 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 03:59 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 04:57 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-12-13 13:24 +0000
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 05:34 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 05:34 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 06:01 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-12-13 15:10 +0000
Re: Winding and unwinding "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 05:30 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 05:45 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 05:58 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 06:04 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 10:24 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 21:44 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 02:13 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 11:45 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 12:09 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 12:50 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-17 05:28 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-12-13 14:54 +0000
Re: Winding and unwinding "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 07:03 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 07:09 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 05:27 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 17:13 -0800
Re: Winding and unwinding Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-12-12 16:28 -0800
csiph-web