Re: sht static guard locks

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:15:02 -0500
From	Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: sht static guard locks
References	<3c9716ac-61bd-4d69-bdcd-3635ea54bf73@googlegroups.com> <mrnuig$8rv$1@dont-email.me> <d49j8iFrgntU12@mid.individual.net>
Date	Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:15:02 +0100
Message-ID	<87k2sbl6qx.fsf@gmail.com> (permalink)
User-Agent	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:cdNBt5NhOpq3W7+uu0HFIjvLbFQ=
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain
Lines	11
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace	sv3-9Gswd8c4PLypVO8a4nSVX5jle00oDyVQh4dBkWJxyKY350tby1LfWL3v/swpM7AX938fgIOOWYBc6Cj!Qzovx+PlrT9HaZsTa5ZyoQYl4Dk7lPp3MmpzSlg3Ig9iqkMJjZrdbJGWHn1fVFjrPPj7HA==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	1570
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.c:68763

Show key headers only | View raw

Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> writes:

>> If you do not care about performance (as many C++ people do) it doesn't
>> matter. If you are very interested in performance this is a serious problem.
>
> If you take the trouble to look (but that would spoil a good rant,
> wouldn't it?) you would see that static variable initialisation that
> is legal in C (from a constant) is treated the same in C++ as C.  The
> compiler inserts guards where a race condition could occur.

Tell your facts to shut up.  Jacob has no interest in them.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

sht static guard locks fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 11:11 -0700
  Re: sht static guard locks jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-08-27 23:15 +0200
    Re: sht static guard locks Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-28 09:51 +1200
      Re: sht static guard locks Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-08-27 18:06 -0500
        Re: sht static guard locks David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-08-28 10:14 +0200
          Re: sht static guard locks Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-08-28 21:30 -0500
            Re: sht static guard locks fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 00:46 -0700
              Re: sht static guard locks fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 01:39 -0700
                Re: sht static guard locks fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 03:09 -0700
                Re: sht static guard locks David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-08-29 12:43 +0200
              Re: sht static guard locks fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 03:20 -0700
              Re: sht static guard locks fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:28 -0700
            Re: sht static guard locks David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-08-29 12:38 +0200
    Re: sht static guard locks Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-28 11:02 +1200
      Re: sht static guard locks Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 18:15 +0100

csiph-web