Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #101767
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... |
| Date | 2017-01-14 15:09 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87d1fpn0f6.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <94292e94-bcb9-40ea-8b8a-2a8563eeb33e@googlegroups.com> <6e096b3f-1e35-49ae-8887-637f94fc6d51@googlegroups.com> |
"Fernando D. Bozzo" <fdbozzo@gmail.com> writes: > Let's say I create a malloc'ed copy of the original string with > strdup(), then use strtok() for parsing it: strdup is not a standard C function. I mention this only because if you are using non-standard functions you can use strtok_r too. > 1) Is this thread safe, given that I give it a new memory segment? Just don't use it. Use the _r version instead. If you are not using threads, the don't worry about it. > 2) Once I finish using it and the duplicated string is sub-segmented, > which end pointing to the first segment: does free() know how to free > the entire memory segment with all their sub-segments? I don't want to > create a memory leak. That's fine. Free will free the space no matter how many null bytes there are in it. I don't think I've ever wanted what strtok does enough to be bothered with its peculiarities. What it is doing is relatively simple and I've always found a better way to get the result I need. -- Ben.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... "Fernando D. Bozzo" <fdbozzo@gmail.com> - 2017-01-13 16:16 -0800
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... "Fernando D. Bozzo" <fdbozzo@gmail.com> - 2017-01-13 16:30 -0800
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-14 00:44 +0000
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... "Fernando D. Bozzo" <fdbozzo@gmail.com> - 2017-01-13 17:43 -0800
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... Manfred <noname@invalid.add> - 2017-01-14 16:52 +0100
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-14 19:38 +0000
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-01-13 16:49 -0800
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... "Fernando D. Bozzo" <fdbozzo@gmail.com> - 2017-01-13 17:39 -0800
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2017-01-13 22:00 -0500
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... "Fernando D. Bozzo" <fdbozzo@gmail.com> - 2017-01-14 03:11 -0800
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2017-01-14 10:50 -0500
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-01-14 14:27 -0800
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... "Fernando D. Bozzo" <fdbozzo@gmail.com> - 2017-01-14 15:21 -0800
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2017-01-15 11:48 -0600
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-01-15 15:24 -0800
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2017-01-15 22:11 -0600
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... Manfred <noname@invalid.add> - 2017-01-14 16:48 +0100
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... "Fernando D. Bozzo" <fdbozzo@gmail.com> - 2017-01-14 03:18 -0800
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... "Fernando D. Bozzo" <fdbozzo@gmail.com> - 2017-01-14 04:16 -0800
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-14 15:14 +0000
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... "Fernando D. Bozzo" <fdbozzo@gmail.com> - 2017-01-14 09:58 -0800
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-14 19:51 +0000
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... "Fernando D. Bozzo" <fdbozzo@gmail.com> - 2017-01-14 15:18 -0800
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-01-14 14:17 -0800
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-14 15:09 +0000
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... "Fernando D. Bozzo" <fdbozzo@gmail.com> - 2017-01-14 11:09 -0800
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-14 11:41 -0800
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-14 20:04 +0000
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2017-01-14 15:09 -0500
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... "Fernando D. Bozzo" <fdbozzo@gmail.com> - 2017-01-14 15:22 -0800
Re: strtok() and the mistery of the same address strings with different lengths... Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-01-14 14:21 -0800
csiph-web