Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #161886

Re: Difference between C89 and other C standards

From Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Difference between C89 and other C standards
Date 2021-07-12 01:13 -0700
Organization None to speak of
Message-ID <87a6ms54qh.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> (permalink)
References <45bddc19-f745-4c9e-b395-8a6b2dd39f5an@googlegroups.com> <scekdv$1f7j$1@gioia.aioe.org> <87im1g5vkw.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <scgs75$mh1$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
> On 12/07/2021 00:34, Keith Thompson wrote:
>> Kli-Kla-Klawitter <kliklaklawitter69@gmail.com> writes:
[...]
>>> There's no differnce. The newer versions are just bufixed specs.
>> 
>> If you're saying there are no differences between C89 and C99,
>> C11, et al, then you are lying.  (I say this based on some of your
>> previous posts.)
>
> He is trolling you Keith, I think.  He is specifically avoiding giving
> the versions to which he is referring.

Of course he (or she) is trolling.  He's demonstrated enough
knowledge of C in his previous posts that it cannot be
from ignorance.  You may recall that he recently claimed that
there's a possible race condition in a simple program that calls
printf followed by exit(0), and doubled down when challenged.
In comp.lang.c++, he made some absurd claims about Unicode support
in gcc v1.01.

I am mildly concerned that some readers might take him seriously,
which is why I have not yet killfiled him, though I dislike giving
him the attention he obviously craves.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
Working, but not speaking, for Philips
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Difference between C89 and other C standards Rayshawn Levy <rayshawnlevy3@gmail.com> - 2021-07-03 17:42 -0700
  Re: Difference between C89 and other C standards Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-07-03 21:29 -0400
  Re: Difference between C89 and other C standards James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-07-03 22:45 -0400
  Re: Difference between C89 and other C standards Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-07-03 22:03 -0700
    Re: Difference between C89 and other C standards Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-07-11 03:00 -0700
      Re: Difference between C89 and other C standards Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-07-11 15:34 -0700
        Re: Difference between C89 and other C standards Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-07-16 03:35 -0700
  Re: Difference between C89 and other C standards Kli-Kla-Klawitter <kliklaklawitter69@gmail.com> - 2021-07-11 13:24 +0200
    Re: Difference between C89 and other C standards Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-07-11 15:34 -0700
      Re: Difference between C89 and other C standards Kli-Kla-Klawitter <kliklaklawitter69@gmail.com> - 2021-07-12 05:33 +0200
      Re: Difference between C89 and other C standards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-07-12 09:49 +0200
        Re: Difference between C89 and other C standards Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-07-12 01:13 -0700
        Re: Difference between C89 and other C standards Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2021-07-16 21:35 +0100

csiph-web