Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #149873
| From | Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning |
| Date | 2020-02-08 15:30 -0800 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Message-ID | <871rr41wt8.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> (permalink) |
| References | <WsmdnVL9ioPMhaDDnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <slrnr3q9cl.km3.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <C_ednVHwpKXf4aPDnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <87a75s1zdp.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vNG%F.278817$j92.166448@fx14.am4> |
Bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
> On 08/02/2020 22:35, Keith Thompson wrote:
>> Robbie Hatley <see.my.signature@for.my.contact.info> writes:
>>> And this problem has existed for YEARS, if not DECADES, and yet the Cygwin
>>> team has done NOTHING to fix it. "The framework to do this is not laid down
>>> SO FAR"??? What the devil??? SO FAR??? How many more decades are they going
>>> to wait??? Humankind will likely go extinct before these guys get their act
>>> together. Makes me want to seek a different programming platform. Perhaps
>>> Mingw or something like that.
>>
>> Maybe you should ask for your money back. Oh, wait ...
>
> That's a little unfair.
Perhaps.
> The availabilty of free compilers such as gcc means there is less of a
> market for commercial versions, at least for individuals or small
> businesses.
>
> But does that mean that if something is wrong with a free one that has
> eliminated paid-for competition, you're not allowed to complain about
> it?
The failure to document -D_GNU_SOURCE is certainly worth complaining
about. My point (which I may not have made very clearly) is that it's
not worth ranting about.
BTW, if anyone wants to submit a patch, it appears that the newlib
exp10(3) man page is extracted from comments in
newlib/libm/common/s_exp10.c
in
git://sourceware.org/git/newlib-cygwin.git
Be sure to look for other GNU extensions as well.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
Working, but not speaking, for Philips Healthcare
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Robbie Hatley <see.my.signature@for.my.contact.info> - 2020-02-06 23:57 -0800
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-02-07 08:53 +0000
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-02-07 02:12 -0800
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Robbie Hatley <see.my.signature@for.my.contact.info> - 2020-02-08 01:53 -0800
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-02-08 12:59 +0000
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Manfred <noname@invalid.add> - 2020-02-08 17:21 +0100
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Manfred <noname@invalid.add> - 2020-02-08 17:34 +0100
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-02-08 14:37 -0800
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-02-08 18:39 +0000
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Robbie Hatley <see.my.signature@for.my.contact.info> - 2020-02-08 01:15 -0800
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2020-02-08 05:05 -0800
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2020-02-08 14:05 +0000
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-02-08 14:35 -0800
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2020-02-08 22:39 +0000
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-02-08 15:30 -0800
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-09 12:24 +0100
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Robbie Hatley <see.my.signature@for.my.contact.info> - 2020-02-09 23:42 -0800
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2020-02-10 05:34 -0800
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-02-10 16:12 +0000
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-02-10 11:14 -0800
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-02-11 07:06 +0000
Re: puzzling enragement by innocuous variable names Robbie Hatley <see.my.signature@for.my.contact.info> - 2020-09-10 19:47 -0700
Re: puzzling enragement by innocuous variable names Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-09-10 20:28 -0700
Re: puzzling enragement by innocuous variable names Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2020-09-13 14:57 +1000
Re: puzzling enragement by innocuous variable names gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2020-09-15 17:58 +0000
Re: puzzling enragement by innocuous variable names Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2020-09-14 09:38 -0600
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-02-11 00:21 -0500
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2020-02-08 17:00 -0600
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Robbie Hatley <see.my.signature@for.my.contact.info> - 2020-02-09 22:50 -0800
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-02-10 16:00 +0000
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-02-10 16:28 +0000
Re: Puzzling "implicit declaration" Warning Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-02-10 16:42 +0000
csiph-web