Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #167067
| From | Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: variable addresses on the stack |
| Date | 2022-08-19 10:59 -0700 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Message-ID | <871qtc868m.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> (permalink) |
| References | <54f99ed2-fe4d-4cab-944c-cb61799d64ecn@googlegroups.com> |
Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> writes:
> I am curious with the following..
>
> void f(int i) {
> if (i > 1) {
> int j ='a';
> }
> if (i < 1) {
> int k ='b';
> }
> }
> When I see the assembly ouput I can see the compiler
> use the address rbp-4 for j and rbp-8 for k
>
> Why not the same address considering that j and k don't exist
> at the same time?
> Any reason?
No particular reason. They don't exist at the same time, and
a compiler certainly *could* allocate them at the same address.
It's valid either way as long as the code behaves correctly.
I played with it myself. With gcc -O0, I got the same result
you did. With -O1 and higher, it eliminated j and k. When I
added putchar calls to prevent that, they were both stored in the
same register.
When I changed j and k to arrays, gcc -O0 allocated them at the
same address.
And yes, block local variables have been supported for a long time.
A 1975 C reference manual allowed declarations only at the top of
a function body, but K&R1 (1978) allows declarations within any
compound statement.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
Working, but not speaking, for Philips
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
variable addresses on the stack Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2022-08-19 10:22 -0700
Re: variable addresses on the stack Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2022-08-19 10:27 -0700
Re: variable addresses on the stack Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-08-19 10:59 -0700
Re: variable addresses on the stack Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2022-09-21 05:09 -0700
Re: variable addresses on the stack Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2022-09-21 05:18 -0700
Re: variable addresses on the stack Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-09-21 15:30 -0700
Re: variable addresses on the stack David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-09-21 15:34 +0200
Re: variable addresses on the stack Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-09-21 15:23 -0700
Re: variable addresses on the stack Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> - 2022-08-19 20:58 +0000
Re: variable addresses on the stack Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2022-08-19 15:47 -0600
Re: variable addresses on the stack Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-08-19 18:47 -0700
csiph-web