Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #164769
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? |
| Date | Thu, 03 Feb 2022 22:28:49 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 27 |
| Message-ID | <86k0ebkuvy.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | <86czl8kaew.fsf@levado.to> <sqvfed$rps$1@dont-email.me> <8635lotrby.fsf@levado.to> <ss06le$h5n$1@dont-email.me> <87y23fxt9p.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86a6fur0rh.fsf@levado.to> <87tue2xbu5.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <864k5n9wdw.fsf@levado.to> <st28po$p1p$1@dont-email.me> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Injection-Info | reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e5e1159670f97e706efea2e630831efe"; logging-data="12448"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19zpwm4j4fpaxlkYW95+nZXMqyF14XPK8c=" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:OQP+6B6iEiAxDIu5J73QhP1naFE= sha1:q853ahsq6rgRR8S+yiDHuE0zJb8= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c:164769 |
Show key headers only | View raw
James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: > On 1/28/22 20:13, Meredith Montgomery wrote: > ... > >> What's a freestanding implementation? > > "The two forms of conforming implementation are hosted and freestanding. > A conforming hosted implementation shall accept any strictly conforming > program. A conforming freestanding implementation shall accept any > strictly conforming program in which the use of the features specified > in the library clause (Clause 7) is confined to the contents of the > standard headers <float.h> , <iso646.h> , <limits.h> , <stdalign.h> , > <stdarg.h> , <stdbool.h> , <stddef.h> , <stdint.h> , and <stdnoreturn.h> > . Additionally, a conforming freestanding implementation shall accept > any strictly conforming program in which the use of the features > specified in the header <string.h> , except the following functions: > strdup , strndup , strcoll , strxfrm , strerror ." (4p6) > > That last sentence is new in n2731.pdf, the latest draft of the CX 202X > that I have. It's not grammatically correct; I suspect that the word > "except" in the final sentence should have been "is confined to the use > of", paralleling the structure of the previous sentence. Surely what is intended is just the opposite: interfaces in <string.h> may be used, except that strdup, strndup, strcoll, strxfrm, strerror may not be used.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-03 14:15 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2022-01-03 17:32 +0000
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-15 22:09 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-03 10:06 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-15 22:12 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-15 23:12 -0500
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-01-20 19:37 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-21 09:35 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-01-21 17:19 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-03 19:31 +0100
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-15 22:14 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-15 23:24 -0500
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-01-16 13:30 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-16 23:25 -0500
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-17 09:43 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-01-17 13:59 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-28 22:13 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-28 21:29 -0500
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-02-03 22:28 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-02-04 10:43 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-01-28 19:37 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-01-30 03:45 +0100
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-01-30 00:01 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-01-30 12:59 -0500
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-17 09:41 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-01-03 14:37 -0500
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-15 22:15 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-01-15 20:55 -0500
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-17 09:44 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-16 05:13 +0100
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-01-15 18:53 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-17 09:46 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-29 16:57 +0100
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-01-29 09:54 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-30 13:17 +0100
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-01-30 23:53 -0800
csiph-web