Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #164530
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? |
| Date | Fri, 21 Jan 2022 17:19:52 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 40 |
| Message-ID | <86ee50pnwn.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | <86czl8kaew.fsf@levado.to> <sqvdud$3tt$1@dont-email.me> <86bl0ctree.fsf@levado.to> <ss0605$e73$1@dont-email.me> <86bl05rc7i.fsf@linuxsc.com> <3a6d2747-1a63-4ded-a568-3c05ca757827n@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Injection-Info | reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="434625eb2bdf5b21805d62a567edd212"; logging-data="31933"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+LrHwso5vAvHg8B0UfgrqHyWl3ke6lHT4=" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:LX/uv42PGyuoyyIDoWD5mumg4sM= sha1:pZuUQ74h/Hi6iDOF8HCkE6ZO3Ro= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c:164530 |
Show key headers only | View raw
"james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: > On Thursday, January 20, 2022 at 10:37:33 PM UTC-5, Tim Rentsch wrote: > >> James Kuyper <james...@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: > > ... > >>> Note that while members of the basic character set are >>> required to be represented by non-negative values (6.2.5p3), >>> members of the extended character set are not. If char is >>> signed, they can be as low as CHAR_MIN, in which case >>> subtracting '0' necessarily results in undefined behavior. >>> [...] > > As Keith pointed out (and I had already conceded four days > before your message) that was a mistake on my part - the > relevant clause says "Otherwise, the new type is signed and the > value cannot be represented in it; either the result is > implementation-defined or an implementation-defined signal is > raised." (6.3.1.3p3). I noticed that, and saw Keith's response, and so chose not to post a followup myself. But I wasn't saying anything about converting back to a char, just about the subtraction. >> No, it doesn't. Subtracting one character value from another can >> give undefined behavior, but it doesn't have to, and indeed >> usually cannot. The only circumstance where it can is when char >> is signed and CHAR_MAX == INT_MAX. > > You're right - I was thinking about the possibility that > CHAR_MAX == INT_MAX, but I forgot to specify that this was a > pre-condition for my claim that the undefined behavior (which > should instead have been a referrence to 6.3.1.3p3) was > necessarily the result. Thank you for pointing this out. I was confident you would understand the point once I mentioned it. The followup was meant mainly for other readers who may have been confused.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-03 14:15 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2022-01-03 17:32 +0000
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-15 22:09 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-03 10:06 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-15 22:12 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-15 23:12 -0500
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-01-20 19:37 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-21 09:35 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-01-21 17:19 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-03 19:31 +0100
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-15 22:14 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-15 23:24 -0500
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-01-16 13:30 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-16 23:25 -0500
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-17 09:43 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-01-17 13:59 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-28 22:13 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-28 21:29 -0500
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-02-03 22:28 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-02-04 10:43 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-01-28 19:37 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-01-30 03:45 +0100
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-01-30 00:01 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-01-30 12:59 -0500
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-17 09:41 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-01-03 14:37 -0500
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-15 22:15 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-01-15 20:55 -0500
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-17 09:44 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-16 05:13 +0100
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-01-15 18:53 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Meredith Montgomery <mmontgomery@levado.to> - 2022-01-17 09:46 -0300
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-29 16:57 +0100
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-01-29 09:54 -0800
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-30 13:17 +0100
Re: does a double cast to unsigned makes sense in any circumstance? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-01-30 23:53 -0800
csiph-web