Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first?

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first?
Date	Wed, 14 Apr 2021 07:54:51 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	16
Message-ID	<86a6q0j4qs.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink)
References	<a21102b2-7c82-40d9-9549-c10a1b77247en@googlegroups.com> <LfAdI.1200$Qf2.110@fx38.iad>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info	reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e14ed2c9513d4c03c630dd7e5aa045d1"; logging-data="9419"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/VNljmXF/bjV8UeWFj8SLQ/YVwsPwAVU0="
User-Agent	Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:tTOxdJlGpvXGheHukUnw5MANhew= sha1:quG+D4dvwDWhwB/94C0eN5GFKLc=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.c:160096

Show key headers only | View raw

Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> writes:

> C does NOT provide any promise as to the order of evaluation for most
> operators.
>
> || and && and , are the exceptions that come to mind that explicitly
> will evaluate the first and then the second, and for || and && the
> second is only evaluated if its value is needed, so for || only if the
> first value was 'false', and for && only if the first value was 'true'

Of course the one other case is the ?: operator, which always
evalutes the first operand first, completely, and then evaluates
either the second or third operand after that.

(C++ has a bunch of other cases, on which I'm not completely
sure of which ones or when they came into effect exactly.)

Thread

Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Oğuz <oguzismailuysal@gmail.com> - 2021-04-13 22:43 -0700
  Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@delq.com> - 2021-04-14 00:04 -0700
  Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-14 09:42 +0200
    Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Oğuz <oguzismailuysal@gmail.com> - 2021-04-14 00:51 -0700
      Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-14 11:25 +0200
    Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-04-14 03:27 -0700
      Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-14 13:28 +0200
        Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-04-14 10:31 -0700
          Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-14 19:40 +0200
    Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-04-14 10:26 -0700
  Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-04-14 07:22 -0400
    Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-04-14 07:54 -0700
    Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-04-14 14:23 -0400
  Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-04-14 14:33 +0000
    Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-04-14 13:15 -0400
  Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-04-14 08:06 -0700
    Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2021-04-14 10:34 -0600
      Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-07-11 00:24 -0700

csiph-web