Re: size_t vs long.

Path	csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: size_t vs long.
Date	Sun, 04 Dec 2022 07:35:08 -0800
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	54
Message-ID	<867cz75gib.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink)
References	<5a71fdad-b7d6-4b4a-a3ee-c5a9beb75d28n@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info	reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a7bd75a4d2e37668b26a7417afa0cbc4"; logging-data="3899080"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/jj9skjBQ3o5GeAE5nA2z9HRl13BwAf1s="
User-Agent	Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:nT/sfMGQ9qaOrnV5J1G9oHN4zSY= sha1:L3w38y1/dSt7u9CqKJ9gM1ggN7E=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.c:168485

Show key headers only | View raw

Amit <amitchoudhary0523@gmail.com> writes:

> I prefer long over size_t.
>
> This is because, in case the user passes a negative number by mistake
> then I will be able to check it if the type is long and return
> immediately.
>
> But if size_t is used, then most probably, it will result in a crash
> - like malloc(-1) will crash the program because unsigned -1 is
> 0xFFFFFFFF and this much memory is not available on today's computers
> and probably may not be available at all in future also (RAM size of
> 2^64 bits is really really huge).
>
> Another thing is that if size_t is used an array index then array[-1]
> will result in wrong behavior or program crash.  But with long, the
> developer can check whether the index is negative, thus avoiding
> program crash.
>
> So, in my opinion, long should be used instead of size_t.
>
> I know that original glibc authors had chosen size_t, so there must
> be some reason for that, however that reason is not clear to me.

I have been reading through your postings in this thread.  Here
are my main impressions.

First, your conclusions are bad.  This result occurs because,
one, some of your assumptions are wrong, and two, your logic is
faulty.

Second, it appears you are fundamentally confused about the
nature of types defined in the ISO C standard.  Most types
defined in the ISO C standard allow some amount of variation in
choices for their precision, representation, etc.  These choices
are left up to the various implementations, and it is expected
that each implementation will make its own choices in a way most
suitable to the implementation's execution environment.  This
variability has been in place for more than 30 years (closer to
40 years if you count the time after the C standardization effort
was started);  it works pretty well, and has not presented any
serious difficulties in carrying it out.

Third, there is nothing wrong with wanting to check for negative
arguments to functionalities such as memory allocation, etc, but
you are conflating that high-level desire with one particular
approach to addressing it, and that approach (using a 'long'
parameter) is inherently flawed.  It appears you simply do not
understand why that is.

If you want to make any progress, you must learn how to separate
these different aspects and deal with them individually.  Otherwise
what you are advocating is just a muddled mess, and no competent
software developer is going to take you seriously.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

size_t vs long. Amit <amitchoudhary0523@gmail.com> - 2022-11-16 22:20 -0800
  Re: size_t vs long. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-11-17 02:44 -0500
    Re: size_t vs long. Amit <amitchoudhary0523@gmail.com> - 2022-11-17 00:16 -0800
      Re: size_t vs long. Amit <amitchoudhary0523@gmail.com> - 2022-11-17 00:28 -0800
        Re: size_t vs long. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-17 07:59 -0500
          Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-17 05:09 -0800
            Re: size_t vs long. Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2022-11-17 13:45 +0000
              Re: size_t vs long. Amit <amitchoudhary0523@gmail.com> - 2022-11-17 22:39 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Ike Naar <ike@sdf.org> - 2022-11-18 08:19 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-11-19 01:42 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 12:32 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-11-20 01:32 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-11-18 11:21 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 02:51 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 11:37 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 22:39 -0800
              Re: size_t vs long. Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-11-18 13:21 -0500
            Re: size_t vs long. Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2022-11-17 16:17 +0000
            Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-11-18 09:56 +0100
            Re: size_t vs long. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-11-20 01:46 -0500
        Re: size_t vs long. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-11-19 01:41 -0500
      Re: size_t vs long. Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2022-11-17 09:37 +0000
      Re: size_t vs long. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-11-19 01:41 -0500
        Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 12:56 -0800
          Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 13:03 -0800
          Re: size_t vs long. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-11-19 21:17 +0000
            Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 17:41 -0800
              Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-11-21 10:30 +0100
                Re: size_t vs long. Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2022-11-22 04:27 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-11-22 08:55 +0100
          Re: size_t vs long. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-11-20 01:33 -0500
            Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 22:50 -0800
              Re: size_t vs long. Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2022-11-25 20:51 +0100
                Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 12:21 -0800
            Re: size_t vs long. Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-11-20 06:52 -0800
  Re: size_t vs long. Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2022-11-17 09:31 +0000
    Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-17 02:43 -0800
      Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-11-17 10:02 -0800
      Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-11-18 10:19 +0100
        Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-18 01:46 -0800
          Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-11-18 13:01 +0100
            Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-18 04:56 -0800
              Re: size_t vs long. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-11-18 14:49 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-11-19 06:19 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 06:44 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-11-19 09:53 -0800
              Re: size_t vs long. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-11-19 02:23 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-11-19 06:42 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-19 10:00 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-11-19 10:09 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 13:27 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2022-11-24 11:26 +0100
                Re: size_t vs long. Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-12-04 06:29 -0800
              Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-11-21 11:31 +0100
                Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 08:51 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-11-21 15:11 -0500
          Re: size_t vs long. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-18 07:33 -0500
            Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-18 04:55 -0800
        Re: size_t vs long. tTh <tth@none.invalid> - 2022-11-18 11:01 +0100
      Re: size_t vs long. Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2022-11-23 09:23 +0100
        Re: size_t vs long. Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2022-11-24 20:09 +0000
          Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-11-25 08:29 +0100
  Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-11-17 11:16 +0100
    Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-17 02:48 -0800
      Re: size_t vs long. Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2022-11-17 11:30 +0000
        Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-17 03:52 -0800
          Re: size_t vs long. Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2022-11-17 12:27 +0000
          Re: size_t vs long. Mark Bluemel <mark.bluemel@gmail.com> - 2022-11-17 04:28 -0800
            Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-17 04:34 -0800
              Re: size_t vs long. Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2022-11-17 15:48 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. Amit <amitchoudhary0523@gmail.com> - 2022-11-17 22:36 -0800
          Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-17 04:28 -0800
            Re: size_t vs long. Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2022-11-17 12:46 +0000
            Re: size_t vs long. Paul N <gw7rib@aol.com> - 2022-11-17 05:24 -0800
              Re: size_t vs long. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-11-17 16:20 +0000
            Re: size_t vs long. Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2022-11-17 15:55 +0000
              Re: size_t vs long. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-11-19 01:43 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 12:47 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-11-20 01:33 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 22:38 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-11-20 01:51 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2022-11-20 15:43 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2022-11-20 15:29 +0000
            Re: size_t vs long. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-11-17 16:59 +0000
      Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-11-18 10:30 +0100
  Re: size_t vs long. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-11-17 12:47 +0000
  Re: size_t vs long. Ike Naar <ike@sdf.org> - 2022-11-17 13:15 +0000
  Re: size_t vs long. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-11-17 15:01 +0000
    Re: size_t vs long. Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2022-11-17 15:24 +0000
  Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-11-17 21:48 -0800
    Re: size_t vs long. Opus <ifonly@youknew.org> - 2022-11-18 20:12 +0100
  Re: size_t vs long. Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2022-11-18 00:26 -0600
    Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-11-18 10:37 +0100
    Re: size_t vs long. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-11-19 01:43 -0500
  Re: size_t vs long. Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-11-20 03:06 +0100
    Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 19:58 -0800
      Re: size_t vs long. Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-11-20 08:34 +0100
        Re: size_t vs long. Opus <ifonly@youknew.org> - 2022-11-20 20:11 +0100
          Re: size_t vs long. Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-11-20 20:48 +0100
      Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 21:57 -0800
        Re: size_t vs long. Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-11-22 02:33 -0800
          Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 12:01 -0800
    Re: size_t vs long. Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2022-11-23 09:28 +0100
      Re: size_t vs long. Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-11-23 13:29 +0100
  Re: size_t vs long. Dolores Filandro <dolfiland8@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 17:26 -0800
    Re: size_t vs long. Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-11-26 09:15 +0100
    Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-11-26 14:50 -0800
      Re: size_t vs long. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-26 18:02 -0500
      Re: size_t vs long. Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2022-11-27 10:36 -0700
        Re: size_t vs long. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-11-27 18:23 +0000
        Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-11-27 15:35 -0800
          Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-11-27 15:39 -0800
            Re: size_t vs long. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-11-27 23:56 +0000
              Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 00:51 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-29 06:29 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 03:43 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-11-29 12:43 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 04:56 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-29 08:11 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 05:18 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-29 18:53 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-10 16:04 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-11-29 17:19 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-29 18:55 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2022-11-30 00:02 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-11-30 01:58 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 10:21 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Opus <ifonly@youknew.org> - 2022-11-29 19:42 +0100
                Re: size_t vs long. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-11-29 19:00 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 13:47 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-11-29 22:45 +0000
              Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 00:42 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 00:44 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 23:31 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 23:35 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-12-01 09:08 +0100
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 04:23 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-12-03 16:42 +0100
                Re: size_t vs long. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-12-01 02:47 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-12-01 09:14 +0100
                Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-01 12:41 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2022-12-01 23:53 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 21:30 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-03 13:48 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-12-05 00:17 +0100
                Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-13 13:12 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-12-03 14:55 +0100
                Re: size_t vs long. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-12-03 09:35 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2022-12-03 14:56 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-12-03 15:33 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2022-12-03 20:51 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-12-03 15:58 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2022-12-03 21:12 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-12-03 17:22 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2022-12-03 23:58 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-12-03 19:25 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2022-12-03 23:44 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-12-03 19:22 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2022-12-03 16:41 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2022-12-03 17:24 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-12-01 10:04 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-12-01 19:14 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 04:49 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 05:13 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-12-02 07:17 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 08:07 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-12-02 16:32 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2022-12-02 16:58 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 12:46 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 21:32 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 21:41 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 21:42 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 21:49 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-04 12:49 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-12-03 12:59 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-12-04 11:54 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-12-02 14:58 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 21:17 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 21:38 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-12-03 03:39 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-12-13 01:45 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-12-13 20:18 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-12-14 01:20 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-12-16 03:03 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2023-01-05 01:21 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2023-01-05 01:41 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-01-05 16:53 +0100
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2023-01-06 01:29 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-01-06 10:51 +0100
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2023-01-06 02:19 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2023-01-06 02:43 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-01-06 14:56 +0100
                Re: size_t vs long. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-01-06 16:26 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-01-06 19:51 +0100
                Re: size_t vs long. Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2023-01-06 12:52 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2023-01-05 15:38 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-01-05 14:05 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2023-01-06 01:30 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-01-06 10:06 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-12-03 18:11 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-12-13 01:46 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-10 17:24 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-12-10 11:51 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-12-10 21:09 +0000
                Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-12-11 20:49 +0100
                Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 10:18 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. A <amit234234234234@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 21:24 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-12-03 16:54 +0100
                Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-12-03 12:48 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-12-04 11:55 -0500
                Re: size_t vs long. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 09:58 -0800
                Re: size_t vs long. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-12-01 20:02 +0000
  Re: size_t vs long. Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-12-04 07:35 -0800

csiph-web