Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: "lvalue" |
| Date | 2014-12-04 14:50 -0500 |
| Organization | Self |
| Message-ID | <5480BB11.3040600@verizon.net> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <lvalue-20141204013653@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <m5oi1f$jmq$1@dont-email.me> <lniohrpetm.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <54808F73.8040103@verizon.net> <ln1tofp5h9.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> |
On 12/04/2014 02:41 PM, Keith Thompson wrote: ... > The expression *E is an lvalue (if E is of object pointer type) > regardless of the value of E. The wording in 6.5.3.2p4 does seem to > imply otherwise; I think that's an error in the standard, similar to the > one in the C90 definition of "lvalue", that should have been corrected. That makes sense to me.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: "lvalue" buja <buja66@gmail.com> - 2014-12-03 18:34 +0100
Re: "lvalue" James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-12-03 13:03 -0500
Re: "lvalue" jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2014-12-03 19:29 +0100
Re: "lvalue" buja <buja66@gmail.com> - 2014-12-03 20:01 +0100
Re: "lvalue" Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-12-03 12:18 -0800
Re: "lvalue" Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2014-12-03 12:20 -0800
Re: "lvalue" James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-12-03 15:29 -0500
Re: "lvalue" James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-12-03 21:48 -0500
Re: "lvalue" Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-12-04 08:20 -0800
Re: "lvalue" James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-12-04 11:44 -0500
Re: "lvalue" Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-12-04 11:41 -0800
Re: "lvalue" James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-12-04 14:50 -0500
Re: "lvalue" Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-12-03 23:40 -0800
Re: "lvalue" Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2014-12-05 09:16 -0800
csiph-web