Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Signed mod unsigned |
| Date | 2012-06-06 18:29 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <4FCFD9B2.9090507@verizon.net> (permalink) |
| References | <jqnnfr$96n$1@news.albasani.net> <jqokpp$oui$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
On 06/06/2012 06:15 PM, Edward Rutherford wrote:
> Johannes Bauer wrote:
>
>> Hi group,
>>
>> today I ran into something I honestly did not expect. Consider this
>> snippet:
>>
>> #include <stdio.h>
>>
>> int main() {
>> int i1, i2;
>> unsigned int u2;
>>
>> i1 = -1;
>>
>> i2 = 30;
>> u2 = 30;
>>
>> printf("%d\n", i1 % i2);
>> printf("%d\n", i1 % u2);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> I expected to find the output "-1 / -1". Instead the result I got was
>> "-1 / 15". Apparently when getting the remainder of a signed by a
>> unsigned int, the signed is silently promoted to unsigned in twos
>> complement and then the operation is performed, i.e.
>>
>> 0xffffffff % 30 == 15
>>
>> I would have expected at least a warning since I find this highly
>> unintuitive -- my expectation would be that the unsigned becomes a
>> (truncated) signed and a warning. Instead gcc does not emit a warning
>> (-Wall -Wextra) and silently performs above operation.
>>
>> Is this really in accordance with the C standard or is gcc doing
>> something weird here?
>
> This looks like a compiler bug. I would report it to a Gcc mailing list.
I explained in my response why I believe that this behavior is not
merely allowed, but mandated, by the C standard. Do you disagree? If so,
on what grounds?
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Signed mod unsigned Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-06-06 15:55 +0200
Re: Signed mod unsigned James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-06-06 10:41 -0400
Re: Signed mod unsigned Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-06-07 12:12 +0200
Re: Signed mod unsigned James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-06-07 06:44 -0400
Re: Signed mod unsigned Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-06-07 13:31 +0200
Re: Signed mod unsigned gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-06-06 07:53 -0700
Re: Signed mod unsigned Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-06-07 12:15 +0200
Re: Signed mod unsigned "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-07 12:29 +0100
Re: Signed mod unsigned Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-06-07 13:43 +0200
Re: Signed mod unsigned Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-07 07:46 -0400
Re: Signed mod unsigned Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-06-07 20:58 +0100
Re: Signed mod unsigned Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-07 19:58 -0400
Re: Signed mod unsigned Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-06-08 02:20 -0700
Re: Signed mod unsigned Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-06-08 11:33 +0200
Re: Signed mod unsigned Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-06-08 12:30 +0100
Re: Signed mod unsigned Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-06-08 11:12 -0700
Re: Signed mod unsigned Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-06-08 20:37 +0100
Re: Signed mod unsigned Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-08 13:44 -0700
Re: Signed mod unsigned Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-06-08 22:22 +0100
Re: Signed mod unsigned Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-06-10 10:56 +0200
Re: Signed mod unsigned Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-06-10 14:40 +0100
Re: Signed mod unsigned Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-11 15:49 -0700
Re: Signed mod unsigned Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-06-24 09:32 -0700
Re: Signed mod unsigned Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-06-08 11:05 -0700
Re: Signed mod unsigned Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-06-08 12:06 +0100
Re: Signed mod unsigned Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-06-08 11:32 -0700
Re: Signed mod unsigned Edward Rutherford <edward.p.rutherford79@REMOVETHIS.gmail.com> - 2012-06-06 22:15 +0000
Re: Signed mod unsigned James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-06-06 18:29 -0400
Re: Signed mod unsigned Edward Rutherford <edward.p.rutherford79@REMOVETHIS.gmail.com> - 2012-06-07 20:44 +0000
Re: Signed mod unsigned James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-06-07 17:08 -0400
csiph-web