Re: Array sizes and const

From	James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Array sizes and const
Date	2012-06-04 12:08 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<4FCCDD8B.8020802@verizon.net> (permalink)
References	<jqdtou$koe$1@dont-email.me> <pan.2012.06.02.22.50.02.517000@nowhere.com> <jqedjj$9gi$1@dont-email.me> <39346056-1528-4667-85d2-a860b6ba018a@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 06/03/2012 10:39 AM, Malcolm McLean wrote:
...
> ... Part of the reason is that whilst int member(const FOO *obj) is clear enough in intention, in fact the constness of obj does not extend to its members.

A compiler for which that was the case would be non-conforming. It
violates 6.5.2.3p4: "A postfix expression followed by the -> operator
and an identifier designates a member of a structure or union object.
... If the first expression is a pointer to a qualified type, the result
has the so-qualified version of the type of the designated member." Can
you provide an example of a compiler claiming to conform to the C
standard which treats a member of *obj as though it was not const-qualified?

Thread

Array sizes and const Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-06-02 15:43 -0500
  Re: Array sizes and const Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-03 08:56 +1200
  Re: Array sizes and const Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-02 16:59 -0400
    Re: Array sizes and const Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-06-02 16:35 -0500
      Re: Array sizes and const jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-06-08 20:05 +0000
      Re: Array sizes and const jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-06-09 21:36 +0000
    Re: Array sizes and const Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-06-02 16:43 -0500
  Re: Array sizes and const Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-02 14:59 -0700
    Re: Array sizes and const Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-06-02 17:12 -0500
      Re: Array sizes and const Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-02 18:27 -0700
        Re: Array sizes and const Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-06-02 22:27 -0500
      Re: Array sizes and const "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-03 11:24 +0100
        Re: Array sizes and const Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-03 13:51 -0700
          Re: Array sizes and const "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-04 12:20 +0100
            Re: Array sizes and const Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-06-04 13:54 +0200
            Re: Array sizes and const Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-04 14:32 -0700
  Re: Array sizes and const Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-06-02 23:50 +0100
    Re: Array sizes and const Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-03 10:53 +1200
      Re: Array sizes and const Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-06-03 14:35 +0100
    Re: Array sizes and const James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-06-02 21:11 -0400
      Re: Array sizes and const Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-06-03 07:39 -0700
        Re: Array sizes and const James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-06-03 16:03 -0400
        Re: Array sizes and const Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-06-03 21:49 +0100
          Re: Array sizes and const Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-03 14:49 -0700
          Re: Array sizes and const Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-06-03 15:02 -0700
            Re: Array sizes and const Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-06-04 01:21 +0100
        Re: Array sizes and const Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-04 09:08 +1200
          Re: Array sizes and const Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-06-03 15:08 -0700
            Re: Array sizes and const Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-04 10:37 +1200
              Re: Array sizes and const "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-03 23:47 +0100
                Re: Array sizes and const Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-04 10:55 +1200
                Re: Array sizes and const Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-06-03 16:04 -0700
                Re: Array sizes and const Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-04 11:14 +1200
                Re: Array sizes and const "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-04 00:23 +0100
                Re: Array sizes and const Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-04 11:30 +1200
                Re: Array sizes and const "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-04 00:52 +0100
                Re: Array sizes and const Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-04 12:04 +1200
                Re: Array sizes and const Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-06-04 01:39 +0100
                Re: Array sizes and const Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-06-04 02:35 -0700
                Re: Array sizes and const Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-06-04 01:33 +0100
                Re: Array sizes and const Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-04 12:35 +1200
                Re: Array sizes and const pacman@kosh.dhis.org (Alan Curry) - 2012-06-04 21:28 +0000
        Re: Array sizes and const James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-06-04 12:08 -0400
        Re: Array sizes and const jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-06-04 22:49 +0000
    Re: Array sizes and const David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2012-06-03 15:46 -0500
  Re: Array sizes and const Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-06-08 02:08 -0700
    Re: Array sizes and const Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-06-08 06:45 -0500
      Re: Array sizes and const Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-06-08 10:49 -0700
        Re: Array sizes and const Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-06-08 18:05 -0500
    Re: Array sizes and const Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-08 13:31 -0700
      Re: Array sizes and const Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-06-08 20:30 -0700

csiph-web